Association of Perceived Neighborhood Disorder with Substance Use Behaviors and Retail Access Among Southern California Adolescents.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Substance Use & Misuse Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1080/10826084.2024.2422972
Alyssa F Harlow, Chanita Hughes Halbert, Lynsie R Ranker, Junhan Cho, Laura K Thompson, Myles Cockburn, Sandrah P Eckel, Jessica L Barrington-Trimis
{"title":"Association of Perceived Neighborhood Disorder with Substance Use Behaviors and Retail Access Among Southern California Adolescents.","authors":"Alyssa F Harlow, Chanita Hughes Halbert, Lynsie R Ranker, Junhan Cho, Laura K Thompson, Myles Cockburn, Sandrah P Eckel, Jessica L Barrington-Trimis","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2024.2422972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neighborhood disadvantage is associated with a higher concentration of tobacco, cannabis and alcohol retailers and greater risk of certain substance use behaviors among youth. Less is known about the impact of subjective neighborhood disorder, which captures distinct exposures that may be relevant to substance use outcomes, including neighborhood social processes, safety, physical characteristics, and neighborhood drug use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from two waves (Feb-Dec 2022) of a prospective cohort of Southern California high school students (<i>n</i> = 2,139; mean[SD] age = 15.7.[0.6]). We examined associations of perceived neighborhood disorder at baseline with (a) perceived ease of purchase (continuous scale 0-100) for alcohol, cannabis, e-cigarettes, cigarettes, hookah, cigars/cigarillos, and oral nicotine at baseline and follow-up, and (b) repeated measures of past 6-month and past-30-day alcohol, vaped cannabis, smoked cannabis, cannabis edibles, e-cigarette, cigarette, cigarillo, hookah, and oral nicotine use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>E-cigarettes were perceived to be the easiest product to purchase. Participants in the highest (vs. lowest) quartile of neighborhood disorder reported greater mean ease of purchasing scores for all products (mean difference range = 5.43 [95%CI: 1.64-9.21] for mint/menthol oral nicotine products to 9.40 [95%CI: 6.16-12.64] for hookah) and greater odds of e-cigarette, smoked cannabis, edibles, vaped THC, and alcohol use (odds ratio range = 1.52 [95%CI: 1.05 to 2.18] for past 6-month alcohol to 5.40 [95% CI: 3.46 to 8.42] for 30-day smoked cannabis).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions that shape youth perceptions of their neighborhood and reduce youth retail access in disadvantaged neighborhoods are needed and may help to prevent youth substance use.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"228-235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11710978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2422972","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neighborhood disadvantage is associated with a higher concentration of tobacco, cannabis and alcohol retailers and greater risk of certain substance use behaviors among youth. Less is known about the impact of subjective neighborhood disorder, which captures distinct exposures that may be relevant to substance use outcomes, including neighborhood social processes, safety, physical characteristics, and neighborhood drug use.

Methods: Data are from two waves (Feb-Dec 2022) of a prospective cohort of Southern California high school students (n = 2,139; mean[SD] age = 15.7.[0.6]). We examined associations of perceived neighborhood disorder at baseline with (a) perceived ease of purchase (continuous scale 0-100) for alcohol, cannabis, e-cigarettes, cigarettes, hookah, cigars/cigarillos, and oral nicotine at baseline and follow-up, and (b) repeated measures of past 6-month and past-30-day alcohol, vaped cannabis, smoked cannabis, cannabis edibles, e-cigarette, cigarette, cigarillo, hookah, and oral nicotine use.

Results: E-cigarettes were perceived to be the easiest product to purchase. Participants in the highest (vs. lowest) quartile of neighborhood disorder reported greater mean ease of purchasing scores for all products (mean difference range = 5.43 [95%CI: 1.64-9.21] for mint/menthol oral nicotine products to 9.40 [95%CI: 6.16-12.64] for hookah) and greater odds of e-cigarette, smoked cannabis, edibles, vaped THC, and alcohol use (odds ratio range = 1.52 [95%CI: 1.05 to 2.18] for past 6-month alcohol to 5.40 [95% CI: 3.46 to 8.42] for 30-day smoked cannabis).

Conclusions: Interventions that shape youth perceptions of their neighborhood and reduce youth retail access in disadvantaged neighborhoods are needed and may help to prevent youth substance use.

在南加州青少年中,感知到的邻里关系混乱与药物使用行为和零售渠道的关系。
背景:邻里劣势与烟草、大麻和酒精零售商的高度集中以及青少年某些药物使用行为的更大风险有关。人们对主观邻里失调的影响知之甚少,而主观邻里失调能捕捉到可能与药物使用结果相关的不同暴露因素,包括邻里社会进程、安全、物理特征和邻里毒品使用情况:数据来自南加州高中生前瞻性队列的两次波次(2022 年 2 月至 12 月)(n = 2,139; 平均 [SD] 年龄 = 15.7. [0.6])。我们研究了基线时感知到的邻里关系混乱与(a)基线和随访时感知到的酒精、大麻、电子烟、香烟、水烟、雪茄/雪茄烟和口服尼古丁的购买难易程度(连续量表 0-100),以及(b)过去 6 个月和过去 30 天酒精、吸食大麻、熏制大麻、大麻药剂、电子烟、香烟、雪茄烟、水烟和口服尼古丁使用情况的重复测量结果之间的关系:电子烟被认为是最容易购买的产品。邻里关系混乱程度最高(与最低)四分位数的参与者对所有产品的购买难易程度平均得分更高(薄荷/薄荷口服尼古丁产品的平均差异范围 = 5.43 [95%CI: 1.64-9.21] ,水烟的平均差异范围 = 9.40 [95%CI: 6.16-12.64] 。16-12.64]),使用电子烟、吸食大麻、口服食品、吸食四氢大麻酚和饮酒的几率更大(过去 6 个月饮酒的几率比范围 = 1.52 [95%CI: 1.05 至 2.18],30 天吸食大麻的几率比范围 = 5.40 [95%CI: 3.46 至 8.42]):需要采取干预措施来塑造青少年对其所在社区的看法,并减少青少年在贫困社区零售毒品的机会,这可能有助于预防青少年使用毒品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信