The effect of a subclinical dose of esketamine on depression and pain after cesarean section: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Xiangqian Wan, Ming Li, Xiantao Li, Huan Dai, Mingqing Peng
{"title":"The effect of a subclinical dose of esketamine on depression and pain after cesarean section: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial.","authors":"Xiangqian Wan, Ming Li, Xiantao Li, Huan Dai, Mingqing Peng","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial was to study the effects of subclinical doses of esketamine on postpartum depression and pain following elective cesarean sections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial included 150 pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean sections. After umbilical cord clamping, participants received either subclinical doses of esketamine (0.25 mg/kg, diluted in 10 mL of 0.9% saline) or a placebo (10 mL of 0.9% saline). The primary outcome measures were the incidence of postpartum depression (PPD) and postoperative pain. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale was used to evaluate PPD on days 3, 7, and 14 postpartum, with an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score ≥ 10 indicating PPD. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 4, 24, and 48 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included adverse reactions and Ramsay sedation scores at 5 and 15 minutes post-administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in the incidence of PPD between the 2 groups on days 3, 7, and 14 postpartum (P > .05). The VAS scores showed significant differences between the 2 groups at 4 and 24 hours postoperatively (P < .05), but not at 48 hours (P > .05). The experimental group had significantly higher adverse reactions and Ramsay sedation scores 5 minutes post-administration compared to the control group (P < .05), but no significant differences were observed upon leaving the operating room (P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Subclinical doses of esketamine did not reduce the incidence of PPD at 14 days postpartum but did significantly lower VAS scores at 24 hours post-surgery. The experimental group experienced temporary increases in adverse reactions and Ramsay sedation scores shortly after administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial was to study the effects of subclinical doses of esketamine on postpartum depression and pain following elective cesarean sections.

Methods: This randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial included 150 pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean sections. After umbilical cord clamping, participants received either subclinical doses of esketamine (0.25 mg/kg, diluted in 10 mL of 0.9% saline) or a placebo (10 mL of 0.9% saline). The primary outcome measures were the incidence of postpartum depression (PPD) and postoperative pain. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale was used to evaluate PPD on days 3, 7, and 14 postpartum, with an Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score ≥ 10 indicating PPD. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 4, 24, and 48 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included adverse reactions and Ramsay sedation scores at 5 and 15 minutes post-administration.

Results: There were no significant differences in the incidence of PPD between the 2 groups on days 3, 7, and 14 postpartum (P > .05). The VAS scores showed significant differences between the 2 groups at 4 and 24 hours postoperatively (P < .05), but not at 48 hours (P > .05). The experimental group had significantly higher adverse reactions and Ramsay sedation scores 5 minutes post-administration compared to the control group (P < .05), but no significant differences were observed upon leaving the operating room (P > .05).

Conclusion: Subclinical doses of esketamine did not reduce the incidence of PPD at 14 days postpartum but did significantly lower VAS scores at 24 hours post-surgery. The experimental group experienced temporary increases in adverse reactions and Ramsay sedation scores shortly after administration.

亚临床剂量的艾司卡胺对剖腹产后抑郁和疼痛的影响:前瞻性、随机、双盲对照试验。
背景:这项随机、双盲安慰剂对照临床试验的目的是研究亚临床剂量的艾司氯胺酮对选择性剖宫产术后产后抑郁和疼痛的影响:这项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验包括150名接受择期剖腹产的孕妇。脐带夹闭后,参与者接受亚临床剂量的埃斯氯胺(0.25 毫克/千克,用 10 毫升 0.9% 生理盐水稀释)或安慰剂(10 毫升 0.9% 生理盐水)。主要结果指标是产后抑郁症(PPD)和术后疼痛的发生率。爱丁堡产后抑郁量表用于评估产后第3、7和14天的PPD,爱丁堡产后抑郁量表得分≥10分表示PPD。术后疼痛采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)在术后 4、24 和 48 小时进行评估。次要结果包括用药后 5 分钟和 15 分钟的不良反应和拉姆塞镇静评分:两组患者在产后第 3、7 和 14 天的 PPD 发生率无明显差异(P > .05)。两组在术后 4 小时和 24 小时的 VAS 评分有明显差异(P .05)。实验组用药后 5 分钟的不良反应和拉姆塞镇静评分明显高于对照组(P .05):结论:亚临床剂量的艾司氯胺酮并不能降低产后14天的PPD发生率,但能显著降低术后24小时的VAS评分。实验组在用药后不久,不良反应和拉姆塞镇静评分暂时上升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信