Development and validation of a nomogram diagnostic model for coronary slow flow patients: A cross-sectional study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Guang Tu, Chen Zhao, Zhong-Lan Cai, Xiao-Mi Huang, Sui-Yang Tong, Neng Wang, Jin Qian
{"title":"Development and validation of a nomogram diagnostic model for coronary slow flow patients: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Guang Tu, Chen Zhao, Zhong-Lan Cai, Xiao-Mi Huang, Sui-Yang Tong, Neng Wang, Jin Qian","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, risk factors for coronary slow flow (CSF) patients were examined, and a clinical prediction model was created. This study involved 573 patients who underwent coronary angiography at our hospital because of chest pain from January 2020 to April 2022. They were divided into CSF group (249 cases) and noncoronary slow flow (NCF) group (324 cases) according to the coronary blood flow results. According to a 7:3 ratio, the patients were categorized into a training group consisting of 402 cases and a validation group consisting of 171 cases. The outcome was assessed by employing multiple logistic regression analysis to examine the factors that influenced it. The model's recognizability was assessed by calculating the consistency index and plotting the receiver operating characteristic curve. Its consistency was assessed by calibration curve, decision curve, and Hosmer-Lemeshow testing goodness-of-fit. The multivariate model included factors such as male, BMI, smoking, diabetes, ursolic acid, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The model validation showed that the consistency index was 0.714, and the external validation set had a consistency index of 0.741. The areas under the curve for the training and external validation sets were respectively 0.730 (95% CI: 0.681-0.779) and 0.770 (95%CI: 0.699-0.841). Nomogram calibration curves indicated intense calibration, and the results of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test indicated that χ² = 1.118, P = .572. The nomogram combining various risk factors can be used for individualized predictions of CSF patients and then facilitate prompt and specific treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, risk factors for coronary slow flow (CSF) patients were examined, and a clinical prediction model was created. This study involved 573 patients who underwent coronary angiography at our hospital because of chest pain from January 2020 to April 2022. They were divided into CSF group (249 cases) and noncoronary slow flow (NCF) group (324 cases) according to the coronary blood flow results. According to a 7:3 ratio, the patients were categorized into a training group consisting of 402 cases and a validation group consisting of 171 cases. The outcome was assessed by employing multiple logistic regression analysis to examine the factors that influenced it. The model's recognizability was assessed by calculating the consistency index and plotting the receiver operating characteristic curve. Its consistency was assessed by calibration curve, decision curve, and Hosmer-Lemeshow testing goodness-of-fit. The multivariate model included factors such as male, BMI, smoking, diabetes, ursolic acid, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The model validation showed that the consistency index was 0.714, and the external validation set had a consistency index of 0.741. The areas under the curve for the training and external validation sets were respectively 0.730 (95% CI: 0.681-0.779) and 0.770 (95%CI: 0.699-0.841). Nomogram calibration curves indicated intense calibration, and the results of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test indicated that χ² = 1.118, P = .572. The nomogram combining various risk factors can be used for individualized predictions of CSF patients and then facilitate prompt and specific treatment.

冠状动脉血流缓慢患者提名图诊断模型的开发与验证:横断面研究
本研究探讨了冠状动脉慢血流(CSF)患者的危险因素,并建立了临床预测模型。本研究涉及 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 4 月期间因胸痛在我院接受冠状动脉造影术的 573 例患者。根据冠状动脉血流结果,他们被分为 CSF 组(249 例)和非冠状动脉慢血流(NCF)组(324 例)。按照 7:3 的比例,患者被分为由 402 例组成的训练组和由 171 例组成的验证组。结果评估采用多元逻辑回归分析,以研究影响结果的因素。通过计算一致性指数和绘制接收者操作特征曲线来评估模型的可识别性。其一致性通过校准曲线、决策曲线和 Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合度检验进行评估。多变量模型包括男性、体重指数、吸烟、糖尿病、熊果酸和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇等因素。模型验证显示一致性指数为 0.714,外部验证集的一致性指数为 0.741。训练集和外部验证集的曲线下面积分别为 0.730(95%CI:0.681-0.779)和 0.770(95%CI:0.699-0.841)。提名图校准曲线显示出强烈的校准性,Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合度检验结果显示χ² = 1.118,P = .572。结合各种危险因素的提名图可用于 CSF 患者的个体化预测,进而促进及时和有针对性的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信