Evaluation of Modified Frailty Index for Predicting Postoperative Outcomes after Upper Extremity Replantation and Revascularization Procedures.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Anshumi Desai, Angela Luo, Peter A Borowsky, Valeria B Hemer, Natalia Fullerton, Kyle Y Xu, Kashyap K Tadisina
{"title":"Evaluation of Modified Frailty Index for Predicting Postoperative Outcomes after Upper Extremity Replantation and Revascularization Procedures.","authors":"Anshumi Desai, Angela Luo, Peter A Borowsky, Valeria B Hemer, Natalia Fullerton, Kyle Y Xu, Kashyap K Tadisina","doi":"10.1055/a-2460-4706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Upper extremity (UE) replantation and revascularization are challenging surgical procedures, with survival rates being 50 to 90%. Preoperative risk stratification is challenging yet crucial as patients with comorbid conditions face increased complications. This study assesses the predictive value of the modified 5-item frailty index (5-mFI) for postoperative complications in these procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A retrospective study was done using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (2011-2021) for UE replantation/revascularization. The 5-mFI score assigned points for comorbidities including pulmonary disease, heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, and functional status (0-5 scale; 1 point to each). 5-mFI scores stratified patients into <2 (low-risk) or ≥2 (high-risk) categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of 2,305 patients, the mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 53.13 years and 28.53 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The 5-mFI ≥2 cohort experienced higher rates of all-cause complications, systemic complications, unplanned readmissions, and return to the operating room on univariate analysis. There was no significant difference in wound complication rates. Multivariable logistic regression showed that a higher 5-mFI was significantly associated with increased risks of all-cause mild and severe systemic complications. Wound complications, length of stay over 30 days, unplanned readmission, and return to the operating room were higher in high-risk patients, however not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> 5-mFI is an effective tool for evaluating risk in UE replantation and revascularization, correlating high scores with significantly increased postoperative complications. High-risk patients with 5-mFI ≥2 also had more reoperations and readmissions. The use of 5-mFI in preoperative assessments can help personalize management, enhancing patient selection and care quality in these complex reconstructions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2460-4706","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Upper extremity (UE) replantation and revascularization are challenging surgical procedures, with survival rates being 50 to 90%. Preoperative risk stratification is challenging yet crucial as patients with comorbid conditions face increased complications. This study assesses the predictive value of the modified 5-item frailty index (5-mFI) for postoperative complications in these procedures.

Methods:  A retrospective study was done using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (2011-2021) for UE replantation/revascularization. The 5-mFI score assigned points for comorbidities including pulmonary disease, heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, and functional status (0-5 scale; 1 point to each). 5-mFI scores stratified patients into <2 (low-risk) or ≥2 (high-risk) categories.

Results:  Of 2,305 patients, the mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 53.13 years and 28.53 kg/m2, respectively. The 5-mFI ≥2 cohort experienced higher rates of all-cause complications, systemic complications, unplanned readmissions, and return to the operating room on univariate analysis. There was no significant difference in wound complication rates. Multivariable logistic regression showed that a higher 5-mFI was significantly associated with increased risks of all-cause mild and severe systemic complications. Wound complications, length of stay over 30 days, unplanned readmission, and return to the operating room were higher in high-risk patients, however not statistically significant.

Conclusion:  5-mFI is an effective tool for evaluating risk in UE replantation and revascularization, correlating high scores with significantly increased postoperative complications. High-risk patients with 5-mFI ≥2 also had more reoperations and readmissions. The use of 5-mFI in preoperative assessments can help personalize management, enhancing patient selection and care quality in these complex reconstructions.

评估用于预测上肢再植和血管重建手术术后结果的改良虚弱指数
背景:上肢(UE)再植和血管重建是具有挑战性的外科手术,存活率为 50%-90%。由于合并症患者面临的并发症会增加,因此术前风险分层具有挑战性且至关重要。本研究评估了改良的 5 项虚弱指数(5-mFI)对这些手术术后并发症的预测价值:这项回顾性研究使用了 ACS NSQIP 数据库(2011-2021 年)中的 UE 再植/血管重建术。5-mFI 评分对肺部疾病、心力衰竭、糖尿病、高血压和功能状态等合并症进行赋分(0-5 分制,每项 1 分)。5-mFI 评分将患者分层:在 2 305 名患者中,平均年龄和体重指数分别为 53.13 岁和 28.53 kg/m2。在单变量分析中,5-mFI≥2 组患者的全因并发症、全身并发症、非计划再入院率和重返手术室率均较高。伤口并发症发生率无明显差异。多变量逻辑回归显示,5-mFI越高,发生全因性轻度和严重全身并发症的风险就越高。高风险患者的伤口并发症、住院时间超过 30 天、非计划再入院和返回手术室的风险更高,但无统计学意义。结论:5-mFI 是评估 UE 再植和血管重建风险的有效工具,高分与术后并发症显著增加相关。5-mFI≥2分的高危患者再次手术和再入院的次数也更多。在术前评估中使用 5-mFI 可以帮助进行个性化管理,在这些复杂的重建手术中提高患者选择和护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信