A deep dive into neonatal well-being and anesthesia in cesarean sections: From procedure to outcome.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rahul Kumar Chaudhary, Sajjad Ahmed Khan, Kanak Khanal, Siddhartha Kumar Yadav, Surya Bahadur Parajuli, Laleet Kumar Rajbanshi, Chandra Bhushan Jha
{"title":"A deep dive into neonatal well-being and anesthesia in cesarean sections: From procedure to outcome.","authors":"Rahul Kumar Chaudhary, Sajjad Ahmed Khan, Kanak Khanal, Siddhartha Kumar Yadav, Surya Bahadur Parajuli, Laleet Kumar Rajbanshi, Chandra Bhushan Jha","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This observational study analyzed data from 502 participants undergoing cesarean section (CS) procedures at an obstetrics and gynecology department, aiming to explore anesthesia practices, neonatal outcomes, and demographic characteristics within the cohort. Participants, aged 17 to 59 years with a mean age of 32.23 years, were enrolled based on the clinical necessity for cesarean delivery during the study period. Informed consent was obtained from each participant or their guardians before data collection, which included detailed demographic information, medical histories, specifics of the cesarean section procedure, and APGAR scores of neonates immediately postbirth (at 0 and 5 minutes). Primary outcomes focused on APGAR scores, critical indicators of neonatal health, while secondary outcomes included the distribution of patient ages, reasons for cesarean sections, and the administration of Bupivacaine during anesthesia. Data were rigorously analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics to summarize participant demographics, anesthesia practices, and neonatal outcomes. Statistical methods included measures of central tendency and dispersion, correlation analyzes to explore associations between variables, and regression models to identify predictors of neonatal APGAR scores. The study identified a range of indications for cesarean sections, with common reasons including fetal distress and maternal health complications. Findings indicated an average APGAR score of 7.02 at 0 minutes and 7.84 at 5 minutes, reflecting generally favorable immediate neonatal outcomes. Anesthesia protocols predominantly involved Bupivacaine, with doses ranging from 1.8 to 2.2 mL, administered based on clinical requirements. In conclusion, this study underscores the importance of comprehensive data collection and rigorous statistical analysis in evaluating cesarean section procedures. Future research could further explore long-term neonatal outcomes and refine anesthesia protocols to optimize maternal and neonatal health during cesarean deliveries.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This observational study analyzed data from 502 participants undergoing cesarean section (CS) procedures at an obstetrics and gynecology department, aiming to explore anesthesia practices, neonatal outcomes, and demographic characteristics within the cohort. Participants, aged 17 to 59 years with a mean age of 32.23 years, were enrolled based on the clinical necessity for cesarean delivery during the study period. Informed consent was obtained from each participant or their guardians before data collection, which included detailed demographic information, medical histories, specifics of the cesarean section procedure, and APGAR scores of neonates immediately postbirth (at 0 and 5 minutes). Primary outcomes focused on APGAR scores, critical indicators of neonatal health, while secondary outcomes included the distribution of patient ages, reasons for cesarean sections, and the administration of Bupivacaine during anesthesia. Data were rigorously analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics to summarize participant demographics, anesthesia practices, and neonatal outcomes. Statistical methods included measures of central tendency and dispersion, correlation analyzes to explore associations between variables, and regression models to identify predictors of neonatal APGAR scores. The study identified a range of indications for cesarean sections, with common reasons including fetal distress and maternal health complications. Findings indicated an average APGAR score of 7.02 at 0 minutes and 7.84 at 5 minutes, reflecting generally favorable immediate neonatal outcomes. Anesthesia protocols predominantly involved Bupivacaine, with doses ranging from 1.8 to 2.2 mL, administered based on clinical requirements. In conclusion, this study underscores the importance of comprehensive data collection and rigorous statistical analysis in evaluating cesarean section procedures. Future research could further explore long-term neonatal outcomes and refine anesthesia protocols to optimize maternal and neonatal health during cesarean deliveries.

深入探讨新生儿福祉和剖腹产麻醉:从程序到结果。
这项观察性研究分析了在妇产科接受剖宫产手术的 502 名参与者的数据,旨在探讨麻醉方法、新生儿结局和人群特征。研究对象的年龄在 17 至 59 岁之间,平均年龄为 32.23 岁,在研究期间根据临床需要进行剖宫产。在收集数据前,已获得每位参与者或其监护人的知情同意,其中包括详细的人口统计学信息、病史、剖宫产手术的具体情况以及新生儿出生后立即(0 分钟和 5 分钟)的 APGAR 评分。主要结果集中在新生儿健康的关键指标 APGAR 评分上,次要结果包括患者年龄分布、剖宫产原因和麻醉期间布比卡因的使用情况。我们使用描述性和推论性统计方法对数据进行了严格分析,总结了参与者的人口统计学特征、麻醉操作和新生儿结果。统计方法包括中心倾向和离散度测量、相关性分析以探讨变量之间的关联,以及回归模型以确定新生儿 APGAR 评分的预测因素。研究发现了一系列剖宫产指征,常见原因包括胎儿窘迫和产妇健康并发症。研究结果表明,0 分钟和 5 分钟时的 APGAR 平均分分别为 7.02 分和 7.84 分,这反映出新生儿的即时预后普遍良好。麻醉方案主要采用布比卡因,剂量从 1.8 毫升到 2.2 毫升不等,根据临床需求进行给药。总之,本研究强调了在评估剖宫产手术时进行全面数据收集和严格统计分析的重要性。未来的研究可进一步探讨新生儿的长期预后,并完善麻醉方案,以优化剖宫产术中产妇和新生儿的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信