Top-funded companies offering digital health interventions for the prevention and treatment of depression: a systematic market analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Oscar Castro, Alicia Salamanca-Sanabria, Aishah Alattas, Gisbert Wilhelm Teepe, Konstantin Leidenberger, Elgar Fleisch, Lorainne Tudor Car, Falk Muller-Riemenschneider, Tobias Kowatsch
{"title":"Top-funded companies offering digital health interventions for the prevention and treatment of depression: a systematic market analysis.","authors":"Oscar Castro, Alicia Salamanca-Sanabria, Aishah Alattas, Gisbert Wilhelm Teepe, Konstantin Leidenberger, Elgar Fleisch, Lorainne Tudor Car, Falk Muller-Riemenschneider, Tobias Kowatsch","doi":"10.1186/s13690-024-01424-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital innovations can reduce the global burden of depression by facilitating timely and scalable interventions. In recent years, the number of commercial Digital Health Interventions for Depression (DHIDs) has been on the rise. However, there is limited knowledge on their content and underpinning scientific evidence. This study aimed to: (i) identify the top-funded companies offering DHIDs and (ii) provide an overview of their interventions, including scientific evidence, psychotherapeutic approaches and use of novel technologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted using two venture capital databases to identify the top-30 funded companies offering DHIDs. In addition, studies related to the DHIDs' were identified via academic databases and hand-searching. The methodological quality of the publications was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The top-30 funded companies offering DHIDs received a total funding of 2,592 million USD. Less than half of the companies produced any scientific research associated with their DHIDs, with a total of 83 publications identified. Twenty-five publications were randomised control trials, of which 15 reported moderate-to-large effects in reducing depression symptoms. Regarding novel technologies, few DHIDs incorporated the use of conversational agents or low-burden sensing technologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Funding received by top-funded companies was not related to the amount of scientific evidence provided on their DHIDs. There was a strong variation in the quantity of evidence produced and an overall need for more rigorous effectiveness trials. Few DHIDs used automated approaches such as conversational agents, limiting their scalability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"82 1","pages":"200"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01424-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digital innovations can reduce the global burden of depression by facilitating timely and scalable interventions. In recent years, the number of commercial Digital Health Interventions for Depression (DHIDs) has been on the rise. However, there is limited knowledge on their content and underpinning scientific evidence. This study aimed to: (i) identify the top-funded companies offering DHIDs and (ii) provide an overview of their interventions, including scientific evidence, psychotherapeutic approaches and use of novel technologies.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted using two venture capital databases to identify the top-30 funded companies offering DHIDs. In addition, studies related to the DHIDs' were identified via academic databases and hand-searching. The methodological quality of the publications was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Results: The top-30 funded companies offering DHIDs received a total funding of 2,592 million USD. Less than half of the companies produced any scientific research associated with their DHIDs, with a total of 83 publications identified. Twenty-five publications were randomised control trials, of which 15 reported moderate-to-large effects in reducing depression symptoms. Regarding novel technologies, few DHIDs incorporated the use of conversational agents or low-burden sensing technologies.

Conclusions: Funding received by top-funded companies was not related to the amount of scientific evidence provided on their DHIDs. There was a strong variation in the quantity of evidence produced and an overall need for more rigorous effectiveness trials. Few DHIDs used automated approaches such as conversational agents, limiting their scalability.

为预防和治疗抑郁症提供数字健康干预措施的顶级受资助公司:系统性市场分析。
背景:数字创新可以通过促进及时和可扩展的干预措施,减轻全球抑郁症的负担。近年来,针对抑郁症的商业数字健康干预措施(DHIDs)的数量不断增加。然而,人们对其内容和基础科学证据的了解却十分有限。本研究旨在本研究旨在:(i) 识别提供 DHIDs 的顶级受资助公司;(ii) 概述其干预措施,包括科学证据、心理治疗方法和新型技术的使用:方法:利用两个风险投资数据库进行了系统搜索,以确定提供 DHIDs 的前 30 家受资助公司。此外,还通过学术数据库和人工搜索确定了与 DHIDs 相关的研究。使用混合方法评估工具对出版物的方法质量进行了评估:提供 DHIDs 的前 30 家受资助公司共获得 25.92 亿美元的资助。只有不到一半的公司发表了与其 DHIDs 相关的科研成果,共发现 83 篇出版物。其中 25 篇为随机对照试验,15 篇报告了在减轻抑郁症状方面的中度至高度效果。在新技术方面,很少有DHID采用对话代理或低负担传感技术:结论:获得最高资助的公司所获得的资金与其DHID所提供的科学证据的数量无关。所提供的证据数量差异很大,总体上需要进行更严格的有效性试验。很少有 DHID 采用对话代理等自动化方法,这限制了其可扩展性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信