Comparative effects of tea and coffee drinking on body weight in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Ahmad Jayedi, Reyhane Norouziasl, Azadeh Aletaha, Amin Mirrafiei, Akbar Soltani, Sakineh Shab-Bidar
{"title":"Comparative effects of tea and coffee drinking on body weight in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.","authors":"Ahmad Jayedi, Reyhane Norouziasl, Azadeh Aletaha, Amin Mirrafiei, Akbar Soltani, Sakineh Shab-Bidar","doi":"10.1017/S0007114524001867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed at quantifying the effects of different tea and coffee on weight loss in adults. We searched PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL and grey literature sources to July 2024. The study excluded cross-over trials without washout period, those in critically ill patients, pregnant or breast-feeding women, multicomponent interventions and active control groups with tea or coffee. A random-effects network meta-analysis with a Bayesian framework was performed to calculate the mean difference (MD) and 95 % credible intervals (CrIs). The certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, and risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tool. Twenty-two randomised controlled trials with 1710 participants (average intervention duration = 10 weeks) were included. Green tea was effective for weight loss compared with placebo (MD: −1·23 kg, 95 % CrI: −2·45, −0·02; low certainty evidence) or water (MD: −1·61 kg, 95 % CrI: −2·90, −0·35; very low certainty evidence), while other beverages (coffee, decaffeinated coffee, green coffee, black tea and sour tea) were not. Green tea was effective for weight loss compared with water in sensitivity analysis of healthy individuals (MD: −3·31 kg, 95 % CrI: −5·83, −1·04). Based on very low to low certainty evidence, green tea drinking may result in a small weight loss in adults. This study mainly focused on weight loss effects of green tea and coffee, with limited data on other teas. Only five trials had longer intervention durations, suggesting future research on long-term effects. Most trials had high bias risk and low certainty, requiring more high-quality trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":9257,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114524001867","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aimed at quantifying the effects of different tea and coffee on weight loss in adults. We searched PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL and grey literature sources to July 2024. The study excluded cross-over trials without washout period, those in critically ill patients, pregnant or breast-feeding women, multicomponent interventions and active control groups with tea or coffee. A random-effects network meta-analysis with a Bayesian framework was performed to calculate the mean difference (MD) and 95 % credible intervals (CrIs). The certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, and risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tool. Twenty-two randomised controlled trials with 1710 participants (average intervention duration = 10 weeks) were included. Green tea was effective for weight loss compared with placebo (MD: −1·23 kg, 95 % CrI: −2·45, −0·02; low certainty evidence) or water (MD: −1·61 kg, 95 % CrI: −2·90, −0·35; very low certainty evidence), while other beverages (coffee, decaffeinated coffee, green coffee, black tea and sour tea) were not. Green tea was effective for weight loss compared with water in sensitivity analysis of healthy individuals (MD: −3·31 kg, 95 % CrI: −5·83, −1·04). Based on very low to low certainty evidence, green tea drinking may result in a small weight loss in adults. This study mainly focused on weight loss effects of green tea and coffee, with limited data on other teas. Only five trials had longer intervention durations, suggesting future research on long-term effects. Most trials had high bias risk and low certainty, requiring more high-quality trials.

喝茶和喝咖啡对成年人体重影响的比较:随机试验的系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
我们旨在量化不同茶叶和咖啡对成年人减肥的影响。我们检索了 PubMed、Scopus、CENTRAL 和截至 2024 年 7 月的灰色文献。研究排除了无冲洗期的交叉试验、危重病人试验、孕妇或哺乳期妇女试验、多成分干预试验以及茶或咖啡的主动对照组试验。研究采用贝叶斯框架进行随机效应网络荟萃分析,计算平均差(MD)和95%可信区间(CrIs)。采用 "建议分级评估、发展和评价 "方法对证据的确定性进行了评级,并采用 Cochrane 工具对偏倚风险进行了评估。纳入了 22 项随机对照试验,共有 1710 人参与(平均干预时间为 10 周)。与安慰剂(MD:-1-23 kg,95% CrI:-2-45,-0-02;低确证度证据)或水(MD:-1-61 kg,95% CrI:-2-90,-0-35;极低确证度证据)相比,绿茶对减肥有效,而其他饮料(咖啡、无咖啡因咖啡、绿咖啡、红茶和酸茶)则无效。在对健康人进行的敏感性分析中,绿茶与水相比具有减肥效果(MD:-3-31 kg,95 % CrI:-5-83,-1-04)。根据极低至低确定性证据,饮用绿茶可能会使成年人的体重略有下降。这项研究主要关注绿茶和咖啡的减肥效果,其他茶类的数据有限。只有五项试验的干预持续时间较长,建议今后对长期效果进行研究。大多数试验的偏倚风险较高,确定性较低,需要更多高质量的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Nutrition
British Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
740
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: British Journal of Nutrition is a leading international peer-reviewed journal covering research on human and clinical nutrition, animal nutrition and basic science as applied to nutrition. The Journal recognises the multidisciplinary nature of nutritional science and includes material from all of the specialities involved in nutrition research, including molecular and cell biology and nutritional genomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信