Influence of the preparation design on the retentive strength of resin-bonded attachments.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jorge Wasmund, Sebastian Wille, Matthias Kern
{"title":"Influence of the preparation design on the retentive strength of resin-bonded attachments.","authors":"Jorge Wasmund, Sebastian Wille, Matthias Kern","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-06017-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study investigated the influence of retention grooves and material thickness of the retainer wing on the retentive strength of resin-bonded attachments (RBAs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty-four extracted human molars were used. Each tooth received a preparation limited to the enamel for the retainer wings of the RBAs. The specimens were divided into eight groups, each containing eight specimens. The groups varied based on the number of conical retention grooves (0, 1, 2, or 4) and the thickness of the CoCr retainer wings (0.4 mm and 0.8 mm). Before testing the retentive strength of the RBAs, the specimens underwent 37,500 thermal cycles followed by dynamic loading of 1,200,000 cycles on the RBAs' patrices using a chewing simulator. The debonding test was conducted using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean retentive strength ranged from 326 ± 96 N to 440 ± 77 N. Only a small portion of specimens (10.9%) exhibited adhesive failure, while the remainder demonstrated cohesive failure within the tooth structure. Neither the number of retention grooves, the thickness of the retainer wings, nor the size of the bonding surface significantly affected retentive strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that reducing the number of retention grooves and the material thickness does not influence the retentive strength of RBAs.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The retention of RBAs appears promising, supporting the clinical application of this treatment modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"28 11","pages":"628"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06017-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study investigated the influence of retention grooves and material thickness of the retainer wing on the retentive strength of resin-bonded attachments (RBAs).

Materials and methods: Sixty-four extracted human molars were used. Each tooth received a preparation limited to the enamel for the retainer wings of the RBAs. The specimens were divided into eight groups, each containing eight specimens. The groups varied based on the number of conical retention grooves (0, 1, 2, or 4) and the thickness of the CoCr retainer wings (0.4 mm and 0.8 mm). Before testing the retentive strength of the RBAs, the specimens underwent 37,500 thermal cycles followed by dynamic loading of 1,200,000 cycles on the RBAs' patrices using a chewing simulator. The debonding test was conducted using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min.

Results: The mean retentive strength ranged from 326 ± 96 N to 440 ± 77 N. Only a small portion of specimens (10.9%) exhibited adhesive failure, while the remainder demonstrated cohesive failure within the tooth structure. Neither the number of retention grooves, the thickness of the retainer wings, nor the size of the bonding surface significantly affected retentive strength.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that reducing the number of retention grooves and the material thickness does not influence the retentive strength of RBAs.

Clinical relevance: The retention of RBAs appears promising, supporting the clinical application of this treatment modality.

制备设计对树脂粘结附着体固位强度的影响。
研究目的该研究探讨了固位槽和固位体翼的材料厚度对树脂粘结附着体(RBA)固位强度的影响:研究使用了六十四颗拔出的人类臼齿。每颗牙齿都进行了仅限于珐琅质的制备,用于制作 RBA 的固位体翼。标本被分为八组,每组包含八个标本。各组根据锥形固位槽的数量(0、1、2 或 4)和钴铬合金固位体翼的厚度(0.4 毫米和 0.8 毫米)而有所不同。在测试 RBA 的固位强度之前,试样经历了 37,500 次热循环,然后使用咀嚼模拟器对 RBA 的表面进行了 1,200,000 次动态加载。剥离测试使用万能试验机进行,十字头速度为 2 毫米/分钟:只有一小部分试样(10.9%)表现出粘合失效,其余试样则表现出牙齿结构内的内聚失效。固位槽的数量、固位体翼的厚度和粘接面的大小对固位强度都没有明显影响:结论:研究结果表明,减少固位槽的数量和材料厚度不会影响 RBA 的固位强度:临床意义:RBA的固位效果很好,支持这种治疗方式的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信