Experiences with diagnostic delay among underserved racial and ethnic patients: a systematic review of the qualitative literature.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Elena Faugno, Alison A Galbraith, Kathleen Walsh, Paul J Maglione, Jocelyn R Farmer, Mei-Sing Ong
{"title":"Experiences with diagnostic delay among underserved racial and ethnic patients: a systematic review of the qualitative literature.","authors":"Elena Faugno, Alison A Galbraith, Kathleen Walsh, Paul J Maglione, Jocelyn R Farmer, Mei-Sing Ong","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diagnostic delay is a pervasive patient safety problem that disproportionately affects historically underserved populations. We aim to systematically examine and synthesise published qualitative studies on patient experiences with diagnostic delay among historically underserved racial and ethnic populations.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Primary qualitative studies detailing patient or caregiver-reported accounts of delay in the diagnosis of a disease among underserved racial and ethnic populations; conducted in the USA; published in English in a peer-reviewed journal (years 2012-2022); study cohort composed of >50% non-white racial and ethnic populations.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Primary outcomes were barriers to timely diagnosis of a disease. Screening and thematic abstraction were performed independently by two investigators, and data were synthesised using the 'Model of Pathways to Treatment' conceptual framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies from multiple clinical domains were included. Barriers to timely diagnosis emerged at the socioeconomic and sociocultural level (low health literacy, distrust in healthcare systems, healthcare avoidance, cultural and linguistic barriers), provider level (cognitive biases, breakdown in patient-provider communication, lack of disease knowledge) and health systems level (inequity in organisational health literacy, administrative barriers, fragmented care environment and a lack of organisational cultural competence). None of the existing studies explored diagnostic disparities among Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders, and few examined chronic conditions known to disproportionately affect historically underserved populations.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Historically underserved racial and ethnic patients encountered many challenges throughout their diagnostic journey. Systemic strategies are needed to address and prevent diagnostic disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017506","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Diagnostic delay is a pervasive patient safety problem that disproportionately affects historically underserved populations. We aim to systematically examine and synthesise published qualitative studies on patient experiences with diagnostic delay among historically underserved racial and ethnic populations.

Data sources: PubMed.

Eligibility criteria: Primary qualitative studies detailing patient or caregiver-reported accounts of delay in the diagnosis of a disease among underserved racial and ethnic populations; conducted in the USA; published in English in a peer-reviewed journal (years 2012-2022); study cohort composed of >50% non-white racial and ethnic populations.

Data analysis: Primary outcomes were barriers to timely diagnosis of a disease. Screening and thematic abstraction were performed independently by two investigators, and data were synthesised using the 'Model of Pathways to Treatment' conceptual framework.

Results: Sixteen studies from multiple clinical domains were included. Barriers to timely diagnosis emerged at the socioeconomic and sociocultural level (low health literacy, distrust in healthcare systems, healthcare avoidance, cultural and linguistic barriers), provider level (cognitive biases, breakdown in patient-provider communication, lack of disease knowledge) and health systems level (inequity in organisational health literacy, administrative barriers, fragmented care environment and a lack of organisational cultural competence). None of the existing studies explored diagnostic disparities among Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders, and few examined chronic conditions known to disproportionately affect historically underserved populations.

Discussion: Historically underserved racial and ethnic patients encountered many challenges throughout their diagnostic journey. Systemic strategies are needed to address and prevent diagnostic disparities.

未得到充分服务的种族和民族患者诊断延误的经历:定性文献的系统回顾。
目的:诊断延误是一个普遍存在的患者安全问题,对历史上医疗服务不足的人群的影响尤为严重。我们旨在系统地检查和综合已发表的定性研究,这些研究涉及历史上未得到充分服务的种族和民族群体中的患者在诊断延误方面的经历:资料来源:PubMed:主要定性研究,详细描述了患者或护理人员报告的在服务不足的种族和族裔人群中疾病诊断延迟的情况;研究在美国进行;以英文发表在同行评审期刊上(2012-2022年);研究队列中50%以上为非白人种族和族裔人群:主要结果是及时诊断疾病的障碍。筛选和专题摘要由两名研究人员独立完成,数据综合采用 "治疗路径模型 "概念框架:结果:共纳入了 16 项来自多个临床领域的研究。及时诊断的障碍出现在社会经济和社会文化层面(低健康素养、不信任医疗保健系统、回避医疗保健、文化和语言障碍)、医疗服务提供者层面(认知偏见、患者与医疗服务提供者沟通障碍、缺乏疾病知识)和医疗保健系统层面(组织健康素养不平等、行政障碍、分散的医疗环境和缺乏组织文化能力)。现有的研究都没有探讨亚裔美国人/太平洋岛民在诊断方面的差异,也很少有研究已知会对历史上未得到充分服务的人群造成严重影响的慢性病:讨论:历来服务不足的种族和族裔患者在诊断过程中遇到了许多挑战。需要采取系统性策略来解决和预防诊断差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信