Willingness to Pay for Improved Groundwater due to BMPs in PEI.

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Patrick Withey, Ryan Trenholm, Joseph McInnis, Van Lantz
{"title":"Willingness to Pay for Improved Groundwater due to BMPs in PEI.","authors":"Patrick Withey, Ryan Trenholm, Joseph McInnis, Van Lantz","doi":"10.1007/s00267-024-02082-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study uses stated preference techniques to evaluate the willingness to pay for improved groundwater in PEI, which allows us to estimate the social cost of nitrogen in this region. 'Beneficial Management Practices' (BMPs) are often employed in PEI's agricultural sector, to improve crop yields but also reduce adverse environmental effects such as nitrogen leaching that can affect ground and surface waters. PEI residents were surveyed to estimate a dollar value of improved water quality due to reduced nitrogen leaching due to BMPs. From the responses to a double-bounded dichotomous choice survey, models using maximum likelihood estimation showed that residents of PEI were willing to pay roughly $230 per year to see a reduction in nitrogen of either 20% or 50%, which translated to $5-13 per kg of nitrogen reduced. However, excluding 'yeah-sayers' and protest votes suggests that WTP is lower for the 20% reduction and increases as nitrogen reduction increases. Thus, a social cost of $13/kg should be considered an upper bound in PEI. WTP values, as well as estimates of the social cost of nitrogen are similar to values in previous literature. We find that variables such as cell phone usage, belief that farmers should pay for BMPs, and spending on water filtration have a statistically significant impact on WTP. Other variables are significant in some model specifications, however many demographic variables such as employment status and education do not affect WTP.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-02082-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study uses stated preference techniques to evaluate the willingness to pay for improved groundwater in PEI, which allows us to estimate the social cost of nitrogen in this region. 'Beneficial Management Practices' (BMPs) are often employed in PEI's agricultural sector, to improve crop yields but also reduce adverse environmental effects such as nitrogen leaching that can affect ground and surface waters. PEI residents were surveyed to estimate a dollar value of improved water quality due to reduced nitrogen leaching due to BMPs. From the responses to a double-bounded dichotomous choice survey, models using maximum likelihood estimation showed that residents of PEI were willing to pay roughly $230 per year to see a reduction in nitrogen of either 20% or 50%, which translated to $5-13 per kg of nitrogen reduced. However, excluding 'yeah-sayers' and protest votes suggests that WTP is lower for the 20% reduction and increases as nitrogen reduction increases. Thus, a social cost of $13/kg should be considered an upper bound in PEI. WTP values, as well as estimates of the social cost of nitrogen are similar to values in previous literature. We find that variables such as cell phone usage, belief that farmers should pay for BMPs, and spending on water filtration have a statistically significant impact on WTP. Other variables are significant in some model specifications, however many demographic variables such as employment status and education do not affect WTP.

PEI 因采用 BMP 而改善地下水的付费意愿。
本研究使用陈述偏好技术来评估为改善爱德华王子岛地下水而付费的意愿,从而估算出该地区氮的社会成本。爱德华王子岛省的农业部门经常采用 "有益管理措施"(BMP),以提高作物产量,同时减少对环境的不利影响,如可能影响地下水和地表水的氮沥滤。我们对爱德华王子岛居民进行了调查,以估算因采用 "BMP "而减少氮浸出所带来的水质改善的美元价值。根据对双界二分法选择调查的答复,使用最大似然估计的模型显示,爱德华王子岛居民愿意每年支付大约 230 美元,以减少 20% 或 50% 的氮,即每减少一公斤氮 5-13 美元。然而,排除 "同意者 "和抗议票后,表明减少 20% 的 WTP 较低,并且随着氮减少量的增加而增加。因此,13 美元/千克的社会成本应被视为爱德华王子岛的上限。WTP值以及氮的社会成本估计值与以往文献中的值相似。我们发现,手机使用率、认为农民应为 BMP 付费以及水过滤支出等变量对 WTP 有显著影响。其他变量在某些模型中也有显著影响,但就业状况和教育程度等许多人口统计学变量并不影响 WTP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信