Accuracy and robustness of a plant-level cabbage yield prediction system generated by assimilating UAV-based remote sensing data into a crop simulation model
Yui Yokoyama, Allard de Wit, Tsutomu Matsui, Takashi S. T. Tanaka
{"title":"Accuracy and robustness of a plant-level cabbage yield prediction system generated by assimilating UAV-based remote sensing data into a crop simulation model","authors":"Yui Yokoyama, Allard de Wit, Tsutomu Matsui, Takashi S. T. Tanaka","doi":"10.1007/s11119-024-10192-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In-season crop growth and yield prediction at high spatial resolution are essential for informing decision-making for precise crop management, logistics and market planning in horticultural crop production. This research aimed to establish a plant-level cabbage yield prediction system by assimilating the leaf area index (LAI) estimated from UAV imagery and a segmentation model into a crop simulation model, the WOrld FOod STudies (WOFOST). The data assimilation approach was applied for one cultivar in five fields and for another cultivar in three fields to assess the yield prediction accuracy and robustness. The results showed that the root mean square error (RMSE) in the prediction of cabbage yield ranged from 1,314 to 2,532 kg ha<sup>–1</sup> (15.8–30.9% of the relative RMSE). Parameter optimisation via data assimilation revealed that the reduction factor in the gross assimilation rate was consistently attributed to a primary yield-limiting factor. This research further explored the effect of reducing the number of LAI observations on the data assimilation performance. The RMSE of yield was only 107 kg ha<sup>–1</sup> higher in the four LAI observations obtained from the early to mid-growing season than for the nine LAI observations over the entire growing season for cultivar ‘TCA 422’. These results highlighted the great possibility of assimilating UAV-derived LAI data into crop simulation models for plant-level cabbage yield prediction even with LAI observations only in the early and mid-growing seasons.</p>","PeriodicalId":20423,"journal":{"name":"Precision Agriculture","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10192-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In-season crop growth and yield prediction at high spatial resolution are essential for informing decision-making for precise crop management, logistics and market planning in horticultural crop production. This research aimed to establish a plant-level cabbage yield prediction system by assimilating the leaf area index (LAI) estimated from UAV imagery and a segmentation model into a crop simulation model, the WOrld FOod STudies (WOFOST). The data assimilation approach was applied for one cultivar in five fields and for another cultivar in three fields to assess the yield prediction accuracy and robustness. The results showed that the root mean square error (RMSE) in the prediction of cabbage yield ranged from 1,314 to 2,532 kg ha–1 (15.8–30.9% of the relative RMSE). Parameter optimisation via data assimilation revealed that the reduction factor in the gross assimilation rate was consistently attributed to a primary yield-limiting factor. This research further explored the effect of reducing the number of LAI observations on the data assimilation performance. The RMSE of yield was only 107 kg ha–1 higher in the four LAI observations obtained from the early to mid-growing season than for the nine LAI observations over the entire growing season for cultivar ‘TCA 422’. These results highlighted the great possibility of assimilating UAV-derived LAI data into crop simulation models for plant-level cabbage yield prediction even with LAI observations only in the early and mid-growing seasons.
高空间分辨率的当季作物生长和产量预测对于园艺作物生产中的精确作物管理、物流和市场规划决策至关重要。本研究旨在通过将无人机图像估算的叶面积指数(LAI)和细分模型同化到作物模拟模型 WOrld FOod STudies(WOFOST)中,建立植物级白菜产量预测系统。数据同化方法适用于五块田中的一个栽培品种和三块田中的另一个栽培品种,以评估产量预测的准确性和稳健性。结果表明,白菜产量预测的均方根误差(RMSE)在 1,314 至 2,532 千克/公顷之间(相对均方根误差为 15.8-30.9%)。通过数据同化进行参数优化后发现,总同化率的降低系数始终是限制产量的主要因素。这项研究进一步探讨了减少 LAI 观测数据数量对数据同化性能的影响。对于栽培品种 "TCA 422 "而言,在生长季初期至中期获得的 4 个 LAI 观测值的产量均方根误差仅比整个生长季的 9 个 LAI 观测值高 107 千克/公顷。这些结果突显了将无人机获得的 LAI 数据同化到作物模拟模型中以进行大白菜植株产量预测的巨大可能性,即使 LAI 观测结果仅出现在生长季的早期和中期。
期刊介绍:
Precision Agriculture promotes the most innovative results coming from the research in the field of precision agriculture. It provides an effective forum for disseminating original and fundamental research and experience in the rapidly advancing area of precision farming.
There are many topics in the field of precision agriculture; therefore, the topics that are addressed include, but are not limited to:
Natural Resources Variability: Soil and landscape variability, digital elevation models, soil mapping, geostatistics, geographic information systems, microclimate, weather forecasting, remote sensing, management units, scale, etc.
Managing Variability: Sampling techniques, site-specific nutrient and crop protection chemical recommendation, crop quality, tillage, seed density, seed variety, yield mapping, remote sensing, record keeping systems, data interpretation and use, crops (corn, wheat, sugar beets, potatoes, peanut, cotton, vegetables, etc.), management scale, etc.
Engineering Technology: Computers, positioning systems, DGPS, machinery, tillage, planting, nutrient and crop protection implements, manure, irrigation, fertigation, yield monitor and mapping, soil physical and chemical characteristic sensors, weed/pest mapping, etc.
Profitability: MEY, net returns, BMPs, optimum recommendations, crop quality, technology cost, sustainability, social impacts, marketing, cooperatives, farm scale, crop type, etc.
Environment: Nutrient, crop protection chemicals, sediments, leaching, runoff, practices, field, watershed, on/off farm, artificial drainage, ground water, surface water, etc.
Technology Transfer: Skill needs, education, training, outreach, methods, surveys, agri-business, producers, distance education, Internet, simulations models, decision support systems, expert systems, on-farm experimentation, partnerships, quality of rural life, etc.