The role of personal and contextual factors when investigating technology integration in general and vocational education

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Alberto Cattaneo , Maria-Luisa Schmitz , Philipp Gonon , Chiara Antonietti , Tessa Consoli , Dominik Petko
{"title":"The role of personal and contextual factors when investigating technology integration in general and vocational education","authors":"Alberto Cattaneo ,&nbsp;Maria-Luisa Schmitz ,&nbsp;Philipp Gonon ,&nbsp;Chiara Antonietti ,&nbsp;Tessa Consoli ,&nbsp;Dominik Petko","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to investigate the extent to which perceived personal and school-related factors influence the quality of technology integration in teaching at the upper secondary level and how this differs between general and vocational education. The quality of technology integration was operationalised through the different activities supported by technology according to the ICAP model. We used data from a survey of 1660 teachers from 106 upper secondary schools in Switzerland to construct structural equation models of the interplay between school-related factors, teacher-related factors, and technology integration. Apart from confirming that technology integration is generally high across all school types, the study shows that among school-related factors, goal clarity is a significant predictor of constructive learning activities and of all the three personal factors considered in the study: teachers’ positive beliefs, technological knowledge, and technological pedagogical content knowledge. Moreover, these personal factors, in turn, constitute significant predictors of all the four types of learning activities. Both full-time and dual vocational schools integrate constructive and interactive activities more than general schools, and vocational teachers report significantly higher beliefs and lower technological pedagogical content knowledge than general school teachers. These findings confirm the importance of considering the interplay between personal and school-related factors when training teachers in technology integration, with interesting differences across school types that seem to depend more on the contextual culture than on the curriculum organisation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 108475"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224003431","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the extent to which perceived personal and school-related factors influence the quality of technology integration in teaching at the upper secondary level and how this differs between general and vocational education. The quality of technology integration was operationalised through the different activities supported by technology according to the ICAP model. We used data from a survey of 1660 teachers from 106 upper secondary schools in Switzerland to construct structural equation models of the interplay between school-related factors, teacher-related factors, and technology integration. Apart from confirming that technology integration is generally high across all school types, the study shows that among school-related factors, goal clarity is a significant predictor of constructive learning activities and of all the three personal factors considered in the study: teachers’ positive beliefs, technological knowledge, and technological pedagogical content knowledge. Moreover, these personal factors, in turn, constitute significant predictors of all the four types of learning activities. Both full-time and dual vocational schools integrate constructive and interactive activities more than general schools, and vocational teachers report significantly higher beliefs and lower technological pedagogical content knowledge than general school teachers. These findings confirm the importance of considering the interplay between personal and school-related factors when training teachers in technology integration, with interesting differences across school types that seem to depend more on the contextual culture than on the curriculum organisation.
调查普通教育和职业教育中的技术整合时个人和环境因素的作用
本研究旨在调查个人感知因素和学校相关因素对高中教学中技术整合质量的影响程度,以及普通教育和职业教育之间的差异。根据 ICAP 模型,技术整合的质量是通过技术所支持的不同活动来实现的。我们利用对瑞士 106 所高中学校 1660 名教师的调查数据,构建了学校相关因素、教师相关因素和技术整合之间相互作用的结构方程模型。除了证实所有类型学校的技术整合程度普遍较高外,研究还表明,在与学校相关的因素中,目标清晰度是建设性学习活动的重要预测因素,也是研究中考虑的三个个人因素(教师的积极信念、技术知识和技术教学内容知识)的重要预测因素。此外,这些个人因素反过来又对所有四种类型的学习活动构成重要的预测因素。与普通学校相比,全日制和双元制职业学校都更多地融入了建设性和互动性活动,职业学校教师的信念明显高于普通学校教师,而技术教学内容知识则低于普通学校教师。这些研究结果证明,在对教师进行技术整合培训时,考虑个人因素和学校相关因素之间的相互作用非常重要,不同类型学校之间的有趣差异似乎更多地取决于环境文化而非课程组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信