Research on design thinking workshop based on protocol analysis: A case study of library usage scenarios

Qing Sheng , Nan Liu , Chenlu Zhou , Suhan Li , Zihao Wang
{"title":"Research on design thinking workshop based on protocol analysis: A case study of library usage scenarios","authors":"Qing Sheng ,&nbsp;Nan Liu ,&nbsp;Chenlu Zhou ,&nbsp;Suhan Li ,&nbsp;Zihao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijadr.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Design thinking has a broad range of applications beyond the design field, such as in libraries. However, significant differences remain between designers and non-designers in using design thinking tools for innovation. This study investigated these distinctions by examining the design thinking process. In a design thinking workshop focused on library usage, we recruited three groups of participants consisting of both designers and non-designers, who were assigned the same tasks and conducted similar activities. Through protocol analysis, significant cognitive differences between designers and non-designers in the design thinking process were found to involve information intention, long-term memory, working memory, creative thinking, and externalization. We concluded that the involvement of a designer is optimal for non-designers when using design thinking for innovation, particularly during the problem-framing stage. Additionally, we summarized the challenges faced by non-designers in utilizing design thinking for innovation and provided recommendations for improving design thinking workshops, including considerations for time management and staff allocation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100031,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Design Research","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 63-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Design Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294978252400015X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design thinking has a broad range of applications beyond the design field, such as in libraries. However, significant differences remain between designers and non-designers in using design thinking tools for innovation. This study investigated these distinctions by examining the design thinking process. In a design thinking workshop focused on library usage, we recruited three groups of participants consisting of both designers and non-designers, who were assigned the same tasks and conducted similar activities. Through protocol analysis, significant cognitive differences between designers and non-designers in the design thinking process were found to involve information intention, long-term memory, working memory, creative thinking, and externalization. We concluded that the involvement of a designer is optimal for non-designers when using design thinking for innovation, particularly during the problem-framing stage. Additionally, we summarized the challenges faced by non-designers in utilizing design thinking for innovation and provided recommendations for improving design thinking workshops, including considerations for time management and staff allocation.
基于协议分析的设计思维工作坊研究:图书馆使用场景案例研究
设计思维在设计领域之外也有广泛的应用,比如图书馆。然而,在使用设计思维工具进行创新方面,设计师和非设计师之间仍然存在着明显的差异。本研究通过考察设计思维过程来研究这些区别。在一次以图书馆使用为主题的设计思维研讨会上,我们招募了三组参与者,其中既有设计师也有非设计师,他们被分配了相同的任务,并开展了类似的活动。通过协议分析,我们发现设计者和非设计者在设计思维过程中存在明显的认知差异,涉及信息意向、长期记忆、工作记忆、创造性思维和外化。我们得出结论,在使用设计思维进行创新时,尤其是在问题框架阶段,设计师的参与对非设计师来说是最佳选择。此外,我们还总结了非设计师在利用设计思维进行创新时所面临的挑战,并提出了改进设计思维研讨会的建议,包括对时间管理和人员分配的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信