Social networks, environmental literacy, and farmers' clean low-carbon farming behaviors: Evidence from villages in China

IF 6.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Fei Lin, Jisheng Li, Chen Wu
{"title":"Social networks, environmental literacy, and farmers' clean low-carbon farming behaviors: Evidence from villages in China","authors":"Fei Lin,&nbsp;Jisheng Li,&nbsp;Chen Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Under the global climate crisis, in addition to governmental environmental regulations, farmers' behaviors has been recognized as an important part of achieving decarbonization plans in the agricultural sector. While social networks and environmental literacy have been confirmed as key factors influencing Clean Low-Carbon Farming Behavior (CLFB) among farmers, yet few studies have explored their combined effects.</div><div>Based on a dataset of 352 farmers in China, this study examined the relationship between social networks, environmental literacy and farmers' CLFB. First, social networks facilitate the implementation of CLFB through three mechanisms: “information networks”, “reference networks”, and “mutual assistance networks” where network strength, breadth, and height also play promoting roles. Second, environmental literacy and its three levels-nominal literacy, functional literacy, and operational literacy-all promote CLFB, while functional literacy shows the greatest promoting effect. Third, the above conclusions still hold after introducing instrumental variables for endogeneity discussion. Finally, environmental literacy and its three levels partially mediate the impact of social networks on CLFB. The findings have important implications for South and Southeast Asian countries that face the same conflict between food security and decarbonization as China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 108439"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924003367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Under the global climate crisis, in addition to governmental environmental regulations, farmers' behaviors has been recognized as an important part of achieving decarbonization plans in the agricultural sector. While social networks and environmental literacy have been confirmed as key factors influencing Clean Low-Carbon Farming Behavior (CLFB) among farmers, yet few studies have explored their combined effects.
Based on a dataset of 352 farmers in China, this study examined the relationship between social networks, environmental literacy and farmers' CLFB. First, social networks facilitate the implementation of CLFB through three mechanisms: “information networks”, “reference networks”, and “mutual assistance networks” where network strength, breadth, and height also play promoting roles. Second, environmental literacy and its three levels-nominal literacy, functional literacy, and operational literacy-all promote CLFB, while functional literacy shows the greatest promoting effect. Third, the above conclusions still hold after introducing instrumental variables for endogeneity discussion. Finally, environmental literacy and its three levels partially mediate the impact of social networks on CLFB. The findings have important implications for South and Southeast Asian countries that face the same conflict between food security and decarbonization as China.
社会网络、环境素养与农民的清洁低碳农业行为:来自中国乡村的证据
在全球气候危机的背景下,除了政府的环保法规,农民的行为也被认为是实现农业领域低碳化计划的重要组成部分。虽然社会网络和环境素养已被证实是影响农民清洁低碳农业行为(CLFB)的关键因素,但很少有研究探讨它们的综合效应。本研究基于中国 352 位农民的数据集,考察了社会网络、环境素养和农民清洁低碳农业行为之间的关系。首先,社会网络通过三种机制促进了农户生态福利法的实施:首先,社会网络通过 "信息网络"、"参考网络 "和 "互助网络 "三种机制促进了农户农林复合经营的实施,其中网络的强度、广度和高度也起到了促进作用。其次,环境素养及其三个层次--名义素养、功能素养和操作素养--都能促进文化建设,而功能素养的促进作用最大。第三,在引入工具变量进行内生性讨论后,上述结论依然成立。最后,环境素养及其三个层次部分地调解了社会网络对社区家庭生活的影响。这些发现对与中国同样面临粮食安全与去碳化冲突的南亚和东南亚国家具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信