Comparison of acidified and conventional low acid thermal processing of white mushroom in glass jars as influenced by reciprocating agitation

IF 5.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Ali Asgar Rampurwala, Ali R. Taharian, Hosahalli S. Ramaswamy
{"title":"Comparison of acidified and conventional low acid thermal processing of white mushroom in glass jars as influenced by reciprocating agitation","authors":"Ali Asgar Rampurwala,&nbsp;Ali R. Taharian,&nbsp;Hosahalli S. Ramaswamy","doi":"10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2024.112342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality advantage that can be gained by combining acidified low-acid food thermal processing (ALTP) (pH &lt; 4.6) and reciprocating agitation thermal processing (RATP) of mushroom. Mushroom was selected as a low acid food which is conventionally subjected to low-acid food conventional thermal processing (LACP) (pH &gt; 4.6). Glass jars were used as containers. LACP was established to target a commercial sterilization process (F<sub>o</sub> value of 5.0 min at 121.1 °C), while ALTP was established to get an equivalent pasteurization process (F<sub>o</sub> value of 10.0 min at 90 °C). Heat penetration data was obtained to establish the above targeted processes and to assess the influence of processing conditions on the heating rate index and heating lag factor. Once processed, the associated quality parameters were evaluated and compared. Process variables included three processing temperatures (115, 120, 125 °C for LACP and 90, 95 and 100 °C for ALTP) and three RATP conditions (0, 1.0 and 2.0 Hz agitation). The results revealed higher rates of heat penetration and lower processing times for both LACP and ALTP processes as the reciprocation frequency increased. Quality retention advantages were realized as the process temperature was increased in each case. The best advantage was delivered with ALTP. Although the rate of heat transfer was the highest at 2.0 Hz, the best quality was observed at a moderate agitation frequency (1.0 Hz) as product texture breakdown was avoided. This is the first study that combined ALTP and RATP and compared them with LACP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":359,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Engineering","volume":"388 ","pages":"Article 112342"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260877424004084","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality advantage that can be gained by combining acidified low-acid food thermal processing (ALTP) (pH < 4.6) and reciprocating agitation thermal processing (RATP) of mushroom. Mushroom was selected as a low acid food which is conventionally subjected to low-acid food conventional thermal processing (LACP) (pH > 4.6). Glass jars were used as containers. LACP was established to target a commercial sterilization process (Fo value of 5.0 min at 121.1 °C), while ALTP was established to get an equivalent pasteurization process (Fo value of 10.0 min at 90 °C). Heat penetration data was obtained to establish the above targeted processes and to assess the influence of processing conditions on the heating rate index and heating lag factor. Once processed, the associated quality parameters were evaluated and compared. Process variables included three processing temperatures (115, 120, 125 °C for LACP and 90, 95 and 100 °C for ALTP) and three RATP conditions (0, 1.0 and 2.0 Hz agitation). The results revealed higher rates of heat penetration and lower processing times for both LACP and ALTP processes as the reciprocation frequency increased. Quality retention advantages were realized as the process temperature was increased in each case. The best advantage was delivered with ALTP. Although the rate of heat transfer was the highest at 2.0 Hz, the best quality was observed at a moderate agitation frequency (1.0 Hz) as product texture breakdown was avoided. This is the first study that combined ALTP and RATP and compared them with LACP.
比较玻璃罐酸化和传统低酸热加工白灵菇对往复式搅拌的影响
这项研究的目的是评估将蘑菇的酸化低酸食品热加工(ALTP)(pH 值为 4.6)和往复搅拌热加工(RATP)相结合所能获得的质量优势。蘑菇被选为低酸食品,通常采用低酸食品常规热加工(LACP)(pH 值为 4.6)。使用玻璃罐作为容器。LACP 的目标是商业灭菌过程(Fo 值为 5.0 分钟,121.1 °C),而 ALTP 的目标是获得等效的巴氏杀菌过程(Fo 值为 10.0 分钟,90 °C)。获得热渗透数据是为了确定上述目标工艺,并评估加工条件对加热速率指数和加热滞后因数的影响。加工完成后,对相关质量参数进行评估和比较。加工变量包括三种加工温度(LACP 为 115、120 和 125 ℃,ALTP 为 90、95 和 100 ℃)和三种 RATP 条件(0、1.0 和 2.0 Hz 搅拌)。结果表明,随着往复频率的增加,LACP 和 ALTP 工艺的热渗透率更高,加工时间更短。在每种情况下,随着加工温度的升高,都能实现质量保持优势。ALTP 的优势最大。虽然在 2.0 Hz 时热传导率最高,但在中等搅拌频率(1.0 Hz)下可观察到最佳质量,因为可避免产品纹理破裂。这是首次将 ALTP 和 RATP 结合起来并与 LACP 进行比较的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Engineering
Journal of Food Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
5.50%
发文量
275
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research and review papers on any subject at the interface between food and engineering, particularly those of relevance to industry, including: Engineering properties of foods, food physics and physical chemistry; processing, measurement, control, packaging, storage and distribution; engineering aspects of the design and production of novel foods and of food service and catering; design and operation of food processes, plant and equipment; economics of food engineering, including the economics of alternative processes. Accounts of food engineering achievements are of particular value.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信