Non-Linear effects of diesel taxes on environmental innovation: Room for higher taxes

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
María A. Quintás , Ana I. Martínez-Senra , M.S. Otero-Giráldez
{"title":"Non-Linear effects of diesel taxes on environmental innovation: Room for higher taxes","authors":"María A. Quintás ,&nbsp;Ana I. Martínez-Senra ,&nbsp;M.S. Otero-Giráldez","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the diesel tax's impact on environmental innovation, addressing a gap in the current literature, which has typically considered environmental policies collectively and has overlooked specific analysis of this tax. It examines whether the relationship is linear, U-shaped, or N-shaped and consider its potential variations across contexts and time lags for the diesel tax. The analysis includes a panel of 1160 records from 40 countries (34 OECD and 6 BRIICS) over 29 years (1990–2018). The results indicate that the diesel tax's effect on environmental innovation follows an N-shaped curve (growth, decline, and revitalisation) in many of the analysed contexts: patents related to the energy and transport sectors, patents related solely to the energy sector, patents related solely to the transport sector, OECD countries, countries with low emissions, countries with high innovation capacity, and different time lags. Furthermore, of the 40 countries analysed, 35 are in the same phase across all models: 12 (6 OECD and 6 BRIICS) are in the growth phase; 20 OECD countries are in the decline phase; and 3 OECD countries are in revitalisation phase. These findings suggest that there is still substantial room to increase diesel taxes from the perspective of environmental innovation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 114395"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524004154","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the diesel tax's impact on environmental innovation, addressing a gap in the current literature, which has typically considered environmental policies collectively and has overlooked specific analysis of this tax. It examines whether the relationship is linear, U-shaped, or N-shaped and consider its potential variations across contexts and time lags for the diesel tax. The analysis includes a panel of 1160 records from 40 countries (34 OECD and 6 BRIICS) over 29 years (1990–2018). The results indicate that the diesel tax's effect on environmental innovation follows an N-shaped curve (growth, decline, and revitalisation) in many of the analysed contexts: patents related to the energy and transport sectors, patents related solely to the energy sector, patents related solely to the transport sector, OECD countries, countries with low emissions, countries with high innovation capacity, and different time lags. Furthermore, of the 40 countries analysed, 35 are in the same phase across all models: 12 (6 OECD and 6 BRIICS) are in the growth phase; 20 OECD countries are in the decline phase; and 3 OECD countries are in revitalisation phase. These findings suggest that there is still substantial room to increase diesel taxes from the perspective of environmental innovation.
柴油税对环境创新的非线性影响:提高税收的空间
本研究调查了柴油税对环境创新的影响,弥补了目前文献中的空白,因为目前的文献通常对环境政策进行整体考虑,而忽略了对柴油税的具体分析。本研究探讨了柴油税与环境创新之间的关系是线性关系、U 型关系还是 N 型关系,并考虑了柴油税在不同环境和时滞下的潜在变化。分析包括来自 40 个国家(34 个经合组织国家和 6 个金砖国家)29 年(1990-2018 年)的 1160 条面板记录。结果表明,柴油税对环境创新的影响在许多分析环境中都呈现出 N 型曲线(增长、下降和振兴):与能源和交通部门相关的专利、仅与能源部门相关的专利、仅与交通部门相关的专利、经合组织国家、低排放国家、创新能力强的国家以及不同的时滞。此外,在所分析的 40 个国家中,有 35 个国家在所有模型中都处于同一阶段:12 个国家(6 个经合组织国家和 6 个金砖国家)处于增长阶段;20 个经合组织国家处于衰退阶段;3 个经合组织国家处于振兴阶段。这些研究结果表明,从环境创新的角度来看,柴油税仍有很大的增长空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信