Manejo del síndrome de distrés respiratorio en recién nacidos prematuros moderados/tardíos: consenso Delphi

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Segundo Rite Gracia , Juan José Agüera Arenas , Gemma Ginovart Galiana , María Jesús Rodríguez Revuelta
{"title":"Manejo del síndrome de distrés respiratorio en recién nacidos prematuros moderados/tardíos: consenso Delphi","authors":"Segundo Rite Gracia ,&nbsp;Juan José Agüera Arenas ,&nbsp;Gemma Ginovart Galiana ,&nbsp;María Jesús Rodríguez Revuelta","doi":"10.1016/j.anpedi.2024.08.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is the most frequent cause of respiratory distress in preterm neonates. In the management of RDS, surfactant plays a pivotal role, but there are no evidence-based recommendations for moderate/late preterm neonates (32-36 weeks).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scientific committee developed a questionnaire with 53 questions addressing diagnosis, treatment, potential complications and future trends in RDS specifically focused on moderate and late preterm neonates. This was followed by the performance of a Delphi survey of expert neonatologists.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Consensus was reached on 98 of the 109 items. The recommendations for the diagnosis of RDS included performing a lung ultrasound and including mild respiratory distress, transient tachypnoea of the newborn, congenital pneumonia and primary pulmonary hypertension in the differential diagnosis. Most panellists agreed on the need for studies that determine the benefit/harm balance, clinical profile and methods of surfactant administration in moderate/late preterm neonates. All respondents would use the MIST approach with devices specifically designed for surfactant administration. Regarding sedation measures during MIST, most participants agreed on the use of nonpharmacological interventions and, if these proved ineffective, an opioid. All respondents agreed that moderate/late preterm neonates are at increased risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality, particularly respiratory problems, and considered the need for more specialised monitoring in hospital follow-up visits in neonates with associated risk factors or a history of complications in the neonatal period. Finally, all respondents agreed that there is a lack of studies identifying risk factors and medium-term adverse outcomes in moderate/late preterm neonates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This expert consensus will help with the diagnosis and management of RDS and guide decision-making about surfactant administration in moderate/late preterm neonates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7783,"journal":{"name":"Anales de pediatria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1695403324002066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is the most frequent cause of respiratory distress in preterm neonates. In the management of RDS, surfactant plays a pivotal role, but there are no evidence-based recommendations for moderate/late preterm neonates (32-36 weeks).

Methods

A scientific committee developed a questionnaire with 53 questions addressing diagnosis, treatment, potential complications and future trends in RDS specifically focused on moderate and late preterm neonates. This was followed by the performance of a Delphi survey of expert neonatologists.

Results

Consensus was reached on 98 of the 109 items. The recommendations for the diagnosis of RDS included performing a lung ultrasound and including mild respiratory distress, transient tachypnoea of the newborn, congenital pneumonia and primary pulmonary hypertension in the differential diagnosis. Most panellists agreed on the need for studies that determine the benefit/harm balance, clinical profile and methods of surfactant administration in moderate/late preterm neonates. All respondents would use the MIST approach with devices specifically designed for surfactant administration. Regarding sedation measures during MIST, most participants agreed on the use of nonpharmacological interventions and, if these proved ineffective, an opioid. All respondents agreed that moderate/late preterm neonates are at increased risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality, particularly respiratory problems, and considered the need for more specialised monitoring in hospital follow-up visits in neonates with associated risk factors or a history of complications in the neonatal period. Finally, all respondents agreed that there is a lack of studies identifying risk factors and medium-term adverse outcomes in moderate/late preterm neonates.

Conclusion

This expert consensus will help with the diagnosis and management of RDS and guide decision-making about surfactant administration in moderate/late preterm neonates.

Abstract Image

中度/晚期早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的管理:德尔菲共识
导言呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)是早产新生儿呼吸窘迫的最常见原因。方法 科学委员会针对中度和晚期早产新生儿的 RDS 诊断、治疗、潜在并发症和未来趋势制定了一份包含 53 个问题的调查问卷。结果 在 109 个问题中,有 98 个问题达成了共识。诊断 RDS 的建议包括进行肺部超声波检查,并将轻度呼吸困难、新生儿一过性呼吸困难、先天性肺炎和原发性肺动脉高压纳入鉴别诊断。大多数小组成员一致认为有必要开展研究,以确定中度/晚期早产新生儿表面活性物质给药的利弊平衡、临床概况和方法。所有受访者都表示将使用 MIST 方法和专门为表面活性物质给药设计的设备。关于 MIST 期间的镇静措施,大多数参与者都同意使用非药物干预措施,如果无效,则使用阿片类药物。所有答复者都认为,中度/晚期早产新生儿的新生儿发病率和死亡率,尤其是呼吸系统问题的风险会增加,并认为有必要在医院随访时对有相关风险因素或新生儿期并发症病史的新生儿进行更专业的监测。最后,所有受访者一致认为,目前还缺乏确定中度/晚期早产新生儿风险因素和中期不良后果的研究。 结论该专家共识将有助于 RDS 的诊断和管理,并指导中度/晚期早产新生儿表面活性物质用药的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anales de pediatria
Anales de pediatria 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
155
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: La Asociación Española de Pediatría tiene como uno de sus objetivos principales la difusión de información científica rigurosa y actualizada sobre las distintas áreas de la pediatría. Anales de Pediatría es el Órgano de Expresión Científica de la Asociación y constituye el vehículo a través del cual se comunican los asociados. Publica trabajos originales sobre investigación clínica en pediatría procedentes de España y países latinoamericanos, así como artículos de revisión elaborados por los mejores profesionales de cada especialidad, las comunicaciones del congreso anual y los libros de actas de la Asociación, y guías de actuación elaboradas por las diferentes Sociedades/Secciones Especializadas integradas en la Asociación Española de Pediatría.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信