Comparative investigation of shock pressure, shock duration, pressure decay time, and elastic energy of both porous gelatin and pure gelatin in shock state

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
{"title":"Comparative investigation of shock pressure, shock duration, pressure decay time, and elastic energy of both porous gelatin and pure gelatin in shock state","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.105148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bird strike is an unavoidable threat in the aviation industry. Real birds are typically replaced with 10 wt. % pure gelatin or porous gelatin to simplify bird strike experiments and meet repeatability requirements. Porous gelatin is obtained by adding chemical agents to gelatin solution, which then solidifies, it can be regarded as pure gelatin filled with tiny pores. The differences in shock state characteristics between these two substitutes remain unclear.</div><div>In this paper, flyer plate impact experiments are conducted separately for the two types of gelatin, obtaining <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>u</mi><mi>s</mi></msub><mo>−</mo><msub><mi>u</mi><mi>p</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>Hugoniot. Considering the continuous release waves, the analytical solutions are provided for the pressure decay time and elastic energy anywhere within the gelatin, during the shock state. Numerical models of gelatin strike rigid target are conducted to extract the shock pressure and elastic energy during the shock state. The differences in mechanical properties of gelatin are analysed to understand that result in variations in pressure, shock duration, decay time, and elastic energy.</div><div>It is evident that the shock pressure of pure gelatin is higher than that of porous gelatin. The shock duration of porous gelatin is longer, and its smaller bulk modulus causes the release wave more gradual, resulting in longer shock decay time. The analytical solution of pressure decay time tends to be overestimated, the faster expansion of porous gelatin during pressure release exacerbates this discrepancy, resulting in a greater difference between the analytical solution and numerical model of elastic energy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50318,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impact Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X24002732","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bird strike is an unavoidable threat in the aviation industry. Real birds are typically replaced with 10 wt. % pure gelatin or porous gelatin to simplify bird strike experiments and meet repeatability requirements. Porous gelatin is obtained by adding chemical agents to gelatin solution, which then solidifies, it can be regarded as pure gelatin filled with tiny pores. The differences in shock state characteristics between these two substitutes remain unclear.
In this paper, flyer plate impact experiments are conducted separately for the two types of gelatin, obtaining usupHugoniot. Considering the continuous release waves, the analytical solutions are provided for the pressure decay time and elastic energy anywhere within the gelatin, during the shock state. Numerical models of gelatin strike rigid target are conducted to extract the shock pressure and elastic energy during the shock state. The differences in mechanical properties of gelatin are analysed to understand that result in variations in pressure, shock duration, decay time, and elastic energy.
It is evident that the shock pressure of pure gelatin is higher than that of porous gelatin. The shock duration of porous gelatin is longer, and its smaller bulk modulus causes the release wave more gradual, resulting in longer shock decay time. The analytical solution of pressure decay time tends to be overestimated, the faster expansion of porous gelatin during pressure release exacerbates this discrepancy, resulting in a greater difference between the analytical solution and numerical model of elastic energy.
多孔明胶和纯明胶在冲击状态下的冲击压力、冲击持续时间、压力衰减时间和弹性能量的比较研究
鸟击是航空业不可避免的威胁。为了简化鸟击实验并满足重复性要求,通常用 10 重量%的纯明胶或多孔明胶代替真鸟。多孔明胶是通过在明胶溶液中添加化学试剂而得到的,凝固后可被视为充满微孔的纯明胶。本文分别对这两种明胶进行了飞碟板冲击实验,获得了向上的Hugoniot。考虑到连续释放波,本文提供了冲击状态下明胶内部任何位置的压力衰减时间和弹性能量的解析解。建立了明胶撞击刚性目标的数值模型,以提取冲击状态下的冲击压力和弹性能量。分析了明胶机械性能的差异,以了解压力、冲击持续时间、衰减时间和弹性能量的变化。多孔明胶的冲击持续时间较长,其较小的体积模量使释放波更加渐进,从而导致冲击衰减时间较长。压力衰减时间的解析解往往被高估,而多孔明胶在压力释放过程中更快的膨胀加剧了这一差异,导致解析解与弹性能量数值模型之间的差异更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Impact Engineering
International Journal of Impact Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.70%
发文量
241
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Impact Engineering, established in 1983 publishes original research findings related to the response of structures, components and materials subjected to impact, blast and high-rate loading. Areas relevant to the journal encompass the following general topics and those associated with them: -Behaviour and failure of structures and materials under impact and blast loading -Systems for protection and absorption of impact and blast loading -Terminal ballistics -Dynamic behaviour and failure of materials including plasticity and fracture -Stress waves -Structural crashworthiness -High-rate mechanical and forming processes -Impact, blast and high-rate loading/measurement techniques and their applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信