Cost minimization of membrane-based separation systems for H2 recovery: A comparison of two optimization approaches

0 ENERGY & FUELS
Carlos D. Fischer , Miguel C. Mussati , Tatiana Morosuk , Sergio F. Mussati
{"title":"Cost minimization of membrane-based separation systems for H2 recovery: A comparison of two optimization approaches","authors":"Carlos D. Fischer ,&nbsp;Miguel C. Mussati ,&nbsp;Tatiana Morosuk ,&nbsp;Sergio F. Mussati","doi":"10.1016/j.jgsce.2024.205479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper addresses the optimization of membrane-based processes, with a specific focus on H<sub>2</sub> recovery in hydrocarbon processing plants. A comparative analysis of two optimization approaches is conducted for designing H<sub>2</sub> recovery systems for a multicomponent gas mixture containing H<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub>/CO<sub>2</sub>/CO. The main objective is to achieve the desired H<sub>2</sub> recovery and product purity levels while minimizing costs. The paper compares two approaches for optimization: the first uses a simulation-based optimization technique with Aspen Custom Modeler/ASPEN Plus, while the second employs a simultaneous optimization method using GAMS (General Algebraic Modeling System). The methods are thoroughly compared, evaluating their strengths and weaknesses through qualitative and numerical assessments. To this end, a reference case was selected from the existing literature. The results obtained indicate that both proposed approaches are suitable for optimizing the design of a two-stage membrane configuration, as evidenced by the similarity of the optimal solutions obtained from both approaches. Subsequently, based on the analysis of numerical values for the optimal design problem for the investigated two-stage membrane configuration, a hybrid strategy for the optimal synthesis and design of multi-stage separation processes is proposed.</div><div>The study fills a gap in the literature by providing a comprehensive analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of optimization approaches in the context of technology of separation of gases. This research provides valuable insights into the field and offers guidance for selecting appropriate approaches to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of gas separation processes in real-world applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100568,"journal":{"name":"Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 205479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949908924002759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper addresses the optimization of membrane-based processes, with a specific focus on H2 recovery in hydrocarbon processing plants. A comparative analysis of two optimization approaches is conducted for designing H2 recovery systems for a multicomponent gas mixture containing H2/N2/CO2/CO. The main objective is to achieve the desired H2 recovery and product purity levels while minimizing costs. The paper compares two approaches for optimization: the first uses a simulation-based optimization technique with Aspen Custom Modeler/ASPEN Plus, while the second employs a simultaneous optimization method using GAMS (General Algebraic Modeling System). The methods are thoroughly compared, evaluating their strengths and weaknesses through qualitative and numerical assessments. To this end, a reference case was selected from the existing literature. The results obtained indicate that both proposed approaches are suitable for optimizing the design of a two-stage membrane configuration, as evidenced by the similarity of the optimal solutions obtained from both approaches. Subsequently, based on the analysis of numerical values for the optimal design problem for the investigated two-stage membrane configuration, a hybrid strategy for the optimal synthesis and design of multi-stage separation processes is proposed.
The study fills a gap in the literature by providing a comprehensive analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of optimization approaches in the context of technology of separation of gases. This research provides valuable insights into the field and offers guidance for selecting appropriate approaches to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of gas separation processes in real-world applications.
用于 H2 回收的膜分离系统的成本最小化:两种优化方法的比较
本文探讨了膜法工艺的优化问题,特别关注碳氢化合物加工厂中的 H2 回收。本文对两种优化方法进行了比较分析,以便为含有 H2/N2/CO2/CO 的多组分气体混合物设计 H2 回收系统。主要目标是在最大限度降低成本的同时,达到理想的 H2 回收率和产品纯度水平。本文对两种优化方法进行了比较:第一种方法采用基于 Aspen Custom Modeler/ASPEN Plus 的仿真优化技术,第二种方法采用 GAMS(泛代数建模系统)的同步优化方法。通过定性和数值评估,对这两种方法的优缺点进行了全面比较和评估。为此,从现有文献中选取了一个参考案例。得出的结果表明,这两种方法都适用于优化两级膜配置的设计,从两种方法得出的最优解的相似性可以看出这一点。随后,根据对所研究的两级膜配置优化设计问题的数值分析,提出了一种多级分离过程优化合成和设计的混合战略。这项研究填补了文献空白,对气体分离技术中优化方法的优缺点进行了全面分析。这项研究为该领域提供了宝贵的见解,并为在实际应用中选择适当的方法来提高气体分离过程的效率和成本效益提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信