{"title":"When noise becomes signal: A study of blink rate using an eye tracker","authors":"Krishnaveni Nagarajan , Kavya Ravi , Shakthi Pradheepa Periakaruppan , PremNandhini Satgunam","doi":"10.1016/j.jtos.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Although blink rate is considered important for digital eye strain and dry eye conditions, its assessment has been mostly manual. This study aimed at quantifying blink rate automatically using the Eyelink 1000 Plus eye tracker and comparing it with manual counting. Additionally, blink rate was correlated with reading eye movements and reading speed.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty participants (mean age 26.8 ± 3.5 years; 19 females) were enrolled. An on-screen reading task for 3 min duration, was repeated 3 times with a 2-min break between the repetitions. During this task, eye movements and blinks were measured through the Eyelink 1000 Plus eye tracker. The blink was also counted manually by the examiner in real time from a video feed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The blink rate obtained by the eye tracker (median [Q1, Q3]:11.7 [6.8,15.5] blinks/min) and manual counting (11.6 [7.1, 15.4] blinks/min) were comparable (p > 0.5). No significant correlations were observed between the blink rate and any of the reading eye movement parameters except saccadic amplitude (Spearman's rho, r<sub>s</sub> = 0.506). No statistically significant correlation was found between the blink rate and reading speed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Eyelink 1000 Plus eye tracker gives a comparable blink rate compared to that obtained through manual counting. A positive correlation between the blink rate and saccade amplitude could indicate a coupled interaction between the two mechanisms to minimize visual loss during reading. The option of using this tracker to investigate blinks in dry eye and binocular vision disorders can be further explored.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54691,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Surface","volume":"34 ","pages":"Pages 516-520"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Surface","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542012424001162","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Although blink rate is considered important for digital eye strain and dry eye conditions, its assessment has been mostly manual. This study aimed at quantifying blink rate automatically using the Eyelink 1000 Plus eye tracker and comparing it with manual counting. Additionally, blink rate was correlated with reading eye movements and reading speed.
Methods
Thirty participants (mean age 26.8 ± 3.5 years; 19 females) were enrolled. An on-screen reading task for 3 min duration, was repeated 3 times with a 2-min break between the repetitions. During this task, eye movements and blinks were measured through the Eyelink 1000 Plus eye tracker. The blink was also counted manually by the examiner in real time from a video feed.
Results
The blink rate obtained by the eye tracker (median [Q1, Q3]:11.7 [6.8,15.5] blinks/min) and manual counting (11.6 [7.1, 15.4] blinks/min) were comparable (p > 0.5). No significant correlations were observed between the blink rate and any of the reading eye movement parameters except saccadic amplitude (Spearman's rho, rs = 0.506). No statistically significant correlation was found between the blink rate and reading speed.
Conclusion
The Eyelink 1000 Plus eye tracker gives a comparable blink rate compared to that obtained through manual counting. A positive correlation between the blink rate and saccade amplitude could indicate a coupled interaction between the two mechanisms to minimize visual loss during reading. The option of using this tracker to investigate blinks in dry eye and binocular vision disorders can be further explored.
期刊介绍:
The Ocular Surface, a quarterly, a peer-reviewed journal, is an authoritative resource that integrates and interprets major findings in diverse fields related to the ocular surface, including ophthalmology, optometry, genetics, molecular biology, pharmacology, immunology, infectious disease, and epidemiology. Its critical review articles cover the most current knowledge on medical and surgical management of ocular surface pathology, new understandings of ocular surface physiology, the meaning of recent discoveries on how the ocular surface responds to injury and disease, and updates on drug and device development. The journal also publishes select original research reports and articles describing cutting-edge techniques and technology in the field.
Benefits to authors
We also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services.
Please see our Guide for Authors for information on article submission. If you require any further information or help, please visit our Support Center