Reporting and Grading of Complications in Urological Surgery: Current Trends and Future Perspectives.

0 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Stamatios Katsimperis, Themistoklis Bellos, Ioannis Manolitsis, Ioannis Kyriazis, Panagiotis Angelopoulos, Panagiotis Neophytou, Sotirios Kapsalos, Nikolaos Kostakopoulos, Lazaros Tzelves, Ioannis Varkarakis, Athanasios Papatsoris, Andreas Skolarikos, Iraklis Mitsogiannis
{"title":"Reporting and Grading of Complications in Urological Surgery: Current Trends and Future Perspectives.","authors":"Stamatios Katsimperis, Themistoklis Bellos, Ioannis Manolitsis, Ioannis Kyriazis, Panagiotis Angelopoulos, Panagiotis Neophytou, Sotirios Kapsalos, Nikolaos Kostakopoulos, Lazaros Tzelves, Ioannis Varkarakis, Athanasios Papatsoris, Andreas Skolarikos, Iraklis Mitsogiannis","doi":"10.5152/tud.2024.24050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There has been a growing need for enhancements in healthcare delivery, especially for the improvement of surgical outcomes. Therefore, implementing consistent reporting of complications enables the evaluation of data quality and facilitates its comparison. There are currently many available reporting and grading systems each with its own set of benefits and drawbacks. In this comprehensive review, we tried to present and assess each of them by demonstrating their criteria and their strong and weak points. To sum up, it seems that there is a need for developing a new reporting and categorization system for complications that are specific to urology.</p>","PeriodicalId":101337,"journal":{"name":"Urology research & practice","volume":"50 3","pages":"154-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology research & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2024.24050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been a growing need for enhancements in healthcare delivery, especially for the improvement of surgical outcomes. Therefore, implementing consistent reporting of complications enables the evaluation of data quality and facilitates its comparison. There are currently many available reporting and grading systems each with its own set of benefits and drawbacks. In this comprehensive review, we tried to present and assess each of them by demonstrating their criteria and their strong and weak points. To sum up, it seems that there is a need for developing a new reporting and categorization system for complications that are specific to urology.

泌尿外科手术并发症的报告和分级:当前趋势与未来展望》。
人们越来越需要改善医疗服务,尤其是改善手术效果。因此,采用一致的并发症报告方式可对数据质量进行评估,并便于比较。目前有许多可用的报告和分级系统,每个系统都有自己的优点和缺点。在这篇综述中,我们试图通过展示它们的标准和优缺点来介绍和评估每一种系统。总之,似乎有必要针对泌尿外科特有的并发症制定新的报告和分类系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信