The safety of cell saver washing all shed mediastinal blood before re-transfusing it to the patient.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sara Scicluna, Magnus Dencker, Henrik Bjursten
{"title":"The safety of cell saver washing all shed mediastinal blood before re-transfusing it to the patient.","authors":"Sara Scicluna, Magnus Dencker, Henrik Bjursten","doi":"10.1177/02676591241297545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cardiotomy suction blood is used in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery to maintain blood volume in the CPB system, although it is known to contain micro emboli, cytokines and free plasma hemoglobin. Our aim was to investigate whether cell saver washing the cardiotomy suction blood before re-transfusing it is safe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study of 1671 elective coronary artery bypass patients, 209 of whom had their pericardial blood processed in a cell saver (Ce-S group). PS matching was performed with patients who had their pericardial blood returned back to the CPB-system by the cardiotomy suction (Ca-S group). Perioperative transfusion requirements, surgical outcome, postoperative lab data and mortality were then compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in baseline characteristics or EuroSCORE between the groups. The number of patients requiring transfusions did not differ, but the patients in the Ca-S group received more platelets (0.34 ± 1.0 vs 0.16 ± 0.7 units, <i>p</i> = .03) than in the Ce-S group. CRP (c-reactive protein) levels at day 2 and 4 were higher in the Ca-S group (174.8 ± 67.2 and 148.9 ± 74.3 mg/L vs 160.1 ± 64.6 and 125.9 ± 67.2 mg/L, <i>p</i> = .03, <i>p</i> = .002) and so were ASAT (aspartate aminotransferase) levels (0.97 ± 0.8 vs 0.81 ± 0.6 μkat/L, <i>p</i> = .03). Mortality, postoperative ventilation time, stroke, mediastinal infections and length of stay in the ICU were the same in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this retrospective study of patients undergoing elective CABG surgery, washing the cardiotomy suction blood before re-transfusion was not associated with higher risk of allogenic blood transfusion, postoperative stroke, mediastinal infections, or 30- and 365-days mortality.</p><p><strong>Clinical registration number: </strong>LU EPN 2016/4.</p>","PeriodicalId":49707,"journal":{"name":"Perfusion-Uk","volume":" ","pages":"2676591241297545"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perfusion-Uk","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591241297545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiotomy suction blood is used in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery to maintain blood volume in the CPB system, although it is known to contain micro emboli, cytokines and free plasma hemoglobin. Our aim was to investigate whether cell saver washing the cardiotomy suction blood before re-transfusing it is safe.

Methods: This is a retrospective study of 1671 elective coronary artery bypass patients, 209 of whom had their pericardial blood processed in a cell saver (Ce-S group). PS matching was performed with patients who had their pericardial blood returned back to the CPB-system by the cardiotomy suction (Ca-S group). Perioperative transfusion requirements, surgical outcome, postoperative lab data and mortality were then compared.

Results: There were no differences in baseline characteristics or EuroSCORE between the groups. The number of patients requiring transfusions did not differ, but the patients in the Ca-S group received more platelets (0.34 ± 1.0 vs 0.16 ± 0.7 units, p = .03) than in the Ce-S group. CRP (c-reactive protein) levels at day 2 and 4 were higher in the Ca-S group (174.8 ± 67.2 and 148.9 ± 74.3 mg/L vs 160.1 ± 64.6 and 125.9 ± 67.2 mg/L, p = .03, p = .002) and so were ASAT (aspartate aminotransferase) levels (0.97 ± 0.8 vs 0.81 ± 0.6 μkat/L, p = .03). Mortality, postoperative ventilation time, stroke, mediastinal infections and length of stay in the ICU were the same in both groups.

Conclusions: In this retrospective study of patients undergoing elective CABG surgery, washing the cardiotomy suction blood before re-transfusion was not associated with higher risk of allogenic blood transfusion, postoperative stroke, mediastinal infections, or 30- and 365-days mortality.

Clinical registration number: LU EPN 2016/4.

细胞保存液清洗所有脱落的纵隔血液后再输给病人的安全性。
导言:开胸抽吸血用于心肺旁路(CPB)手术,以维持 CPB 系统的血容量,但已知其中含有微栓子、细胞因子和游离血浆血红蛋白。我们的目的是研究细胞保存者在重新输血前清洗心脏切除术吸出的血液是否安全:这是一项对 1671 例择期冠状动脉搭桥术患者的回顾性研究,其中 209 例患者的心包血在细胞保存器中进行了处理(Ce-S 组)。与通过心脏切开抽吸术将心包血送回 CPB 系统的患者(Ca-S 组)进行 PS 比对。然后比较了围手术期输血需求、手术结果、术后实验室数据和死亡率:结果:两组患者的基线特征和 EuroSCORE 均无差异。需要输血的患者人数没有差异,但 Ca-S 组患者接受的血小板(0.34 ± 1.0 vs 0.16 ± 0.7 单位,p = .03)多于 Ce-S 组。第 2 天和第 4 天,Ca-S 组的 CRP(c 反应蛋白)水平更高(174.8 ± 67.2 和 148.9 ± 74.3 mg/L vs 160.1 ± 64.6 和 125.9 ± 67.2 mg/L,p = .03,p = .002),ASAT(天冬氨酸氨基转移酶)水平也更高(0.97 ± 0.8 vs 0.81 ± 0.6 μkat/L,p = .03)。两组患者的死亡率、术后通气时间、中风、纵隔感染和重症监护室住院时间相同:在这项对接受择期 CABG 手术的患者进行的回顾性研究中,再次输血前清洗心脏切开吸出的血液与异体输血风险升高、术后中风、纵隔感染或 30 天和 365 天死亡率无关:临床注册编号:LU EPN 2016/4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perfusion-Uk
Perfusion-Uk 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perfusion is an ISI-ranked, peer-reviewed scholarly journal, which provides current information on all aspects of perfusion, oxygenation and biocompatibility and their use in modern cardiac surgery. The journal is at the forefront of international research and development and presents an appropriately multidisciplinary approach to perfusion science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信