Maxwell Tran MD , Bhisham Chera MD, FASTRO , Kevin Shrake MD , Bradley Depaoli MD , Edward Duffy III MD , Michael Hall MD , Justin Steinman DO , Stephanie Myers MD , Osagie Igiebor MD , Jay Callahan , Daniel McDonald MS , Jennifer Harper MD , Samuel Lewis Cooper MD
{"title":"Reducing Patient Care Delays in Radiation Oncology Via Optimization of Insurance Preauthorization","authors":"Maxwell Tran MD , Bhisham Chera MD, FASTRO , Kevin Shrake MD , Bradley Depaoli MD , Edward Duffy III MD , Michael Hall MD , Justin Steinman DO , Stephanie Myers MD , Osagie Igiebor MD , Jay Callahan , Daniel McDonald MS , Jennifer Harper MD , Samuel Lewis Cooper MD","doi":"10.1016/j.prro.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Difficulties and delays in insurance preauthorization (preauth) can negatively impact patient care, resulting in postponing, modifying, or even canceling radiation therapy for patients. We aimed to perform a root cause analysis for preauth delays in our department and implement solutions to optimize our workflow. Our primary objectives were to decrease the mean time for clinical treatment plan (CTP) completion and the number of cases delayed/denied by 50% each.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>We performed a root cause analysis for preauth delays and used the Plan, Do, Study, Act, and A3 quality improvement methods. We sampled ∼2 cases per disease site (19 cases from July to August 2022) to determine the baseline. Countermeasures included (1) optimizing our CTP templates per disease site to contain the specific clinical information required for preauth, (2) formalizing earlier completion of CTPs in our Care Path, and (3) formalizing the preauth workflow in our Care Path. We tracked various metrics, including the mean time for CTP completion, the percentage usage of our Care Path, the percentage usage of revised CTP templates, the mean time until preauth was initiated and completed, and the percentage of cases delayed/denied. Two-tailed <em>t</em> tests and χ<sup>2</sup> tests were used to generate <em>P</em> values comparing mean values and percentages, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 495 patients completed computed tomography simulation in our department between October 2022 and February 2023. The mean time for CTP completion (day 0 = day of computed tomography simulation scheduling) improved from 16 days at baseline to 4 days (<em>P</em> < .001). Care Path usage improved from 16% to 97% (<em>P</em> < .001), as did the usage of our revised CTP templates, from 0% to 97% (<em>P</em> < .001). The mean time from insurance preauth initiation to completion improved from 5 days to 1 day. The percentage of cases that were delayed/denied was reduced significantly from 32% to 8% (<em>P</em> < .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Improving timeliness and details of CTP documentation and preauth by using our Care Path and optimizing CTP templates improved the efficiency of insurance preauth completion and reduced the number of cases delayed/denied.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54245,"journal":{"name":"Practical Radiation Oncology","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages e100-e108"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879850024002832","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Difficulties and delays in insurance preauthorization (preauth) can negatively impact patient care, resulting in postponing, modifying, or even canceling radiation therapy for patients. We aimed to perform a root cause analysis for preauth delays in our department and implement solutions to optimize our workflow. Our primary objectives were to decrease the mean time for clinical treatment plan (CTP) completion and the number of cases delayed/denied by 50% each.
Methods and Materials
We performed a root cause analysis for preauth delays and used the Plan, Do, Study, Act, and A3 quality improvement methods. We sampled ∼2 cases per disease site (19 cases from July to August 2022) to determine the baseline. Countermeasures included (1) optimizing our CTP templates per disease site to contain the specific clinical information required for preauth, (2) formalizing earlier completion of CTPs in our Care Path, and (3) formalizing the preauth workflow in our Care Path. We tracked various metrics, including the mean time for CTP completion, the percentage usage of our Care Path, the percentage usage of revised CTP templates, the mean time until preauth was initiated and completed, and the percentage of cases delayed/denied. Two-tailed t tests and χ2 tests were used to generate P values comparing mean values and percentages, respectively.
Results
A total of 495 patients completed computed tomography simulation in our department between October 2022 and February 2023. The mean time for CTP completion (day 0 = day of computed tomography simulation scheduling) improved from 16 days at baseline to 4 days (P < .001). Care Path usage improved from 16% to 97% (P < .001), as did the usage of our revised CTP templates, from 0% to 97% (P < .001). The mean time from insurance preauth initiation to completion improved from 5 days to 1 day. The percentage of cases that were delayed/denied was reduced significantly from 32% to 8% (P < .001).
Conclusions
Improving timeliness and details of CTP documentation and preauth by using our Care Path and optimizing CTP templates improved the efficiency of insurance preauth completion and reduced the number of cases delayed/denied.
期刊介绍:
The overarching mission of Practical Radiation Oncology is to improve the quality of radiation oncology practice. PRO''s purpose is to document the state of current practice, providing background for those in training and continuing education for practitioners, through discussion and illustration of new techniques, evaluation of current practices, and publication of case reports. PRO strives to provide its readers content that emphasizes knowledge "with a purpose." The content of PRO includes:
Original articles focusing on patient safety, quality measurement, or quality improvement initiatives
Original articles focusing on imaging, contouring, target delineation, simulation, treatment planning, immobilization, organ motion, and other practical issues
ASTRO guidelines, position papers, and consensus statements
Essays that highlight enriching personal experiences in caring for cancer patients and their families.