Development and Validation of the Participation Questionnaire for Preschoolers with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Structural Validity, Internal Consistency, and Construct Validity.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Takuto Nakamura, Hirofumi Nagayama, Satoshi Sasada
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Participation Questionnaire for Preschoolers with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Structural Validity, Internal Consistency, and Construct Validity.","authors":"Takuto Nakamura, Hirofumi Nagayama, Satoshi Sasada","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2024.2421856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to develop the Participation Questionnaire for Preschoolers (PQP) and validate its psychometric properties as a disability-specific tool designed to assess participation in preschool-aged children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study recruited caregivers of 412 children, including those diagnosed with ASD and those at risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. Participants were recruited from child development facilities, medical institutions, and developmental support websites across Japan. Data from 287 children diagnosed with ASD were analyzed for item reduction, followed by exploratory factor analysis and the calculation of Cronbach's alpha to evaluate internal consistency. Five hypotheses were tested to assess construct validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Item reduction resulted in the removal of seven items and the identification of four factors: Friendship and Education, Family Satisfaction, Daily Living and Independence, and Leisure and Community Life. Cronbach's alpha values for these factors ranged from 0.74 to 0.88, indicating acceptable internal consistency. Three of the five hypotheses related to construct validity were supported, aligning with expectations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PQP exhibited structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity. However, further longitudinal studies are needed to validate its measurement properties over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2024.2421856","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to develop the Participation Questionnaire for Preschoolers (PQP) and validate its psychometric properties as a disability-specific tool designed to assess participation in preschool-aged children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited caregivers of 412 children, including those diagnosed with ASD and those at risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. Participants were recruited from child development facilities, medical institutions, and developmental support websites across Japan. Data from 287 children diagnosed with ASD were analyzed for item reduction, followed by exploratory factor analysis and the calculation of Cronbach's alpha to evaluate internal consistency. Five hypotheses were tested to assess construct validity.

Results: Item reduction resulted in the removal of seven items and the identification of four factors: Friendship and Education, Family Satisfaction, Daily Living and Independence, and Leisure and Community Life. Cronbach's alpha values for these factors ranged from 0.74 to 0.88, indicating acceptable internal consistency. Three of the five hypotheses related to construct validity were supported, aligning with expectations.

Conclusion: The PQP exhibited structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity. However, further longitudinal studies are needed to validate its measurement properties over time.

自闭症谱系障碍学龄前儿童参与问卷的开发与验证:结构有效性、内部一致性和构造有效性。
目的:本研究旨在开发学龄前儿童参与度问卷(PQP),并验证其心理测量学特性,该问卷是一种针对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)学龄前儿童的参与度评估工具:这项横断面研究招募了 412 名儿童的照顾者,其中包括被诊断患有自闭症谱系障碍的儿童和有神经发育障碍风险的儿童。参与者来自日本各地的儿童发展机构、医疗机构和发展支持网站。对来自 287 名确诊为 ASD 儿童的数据进行了项目缩减分析,然后进行了探索性因子分析,并计算了 Cronbach's alpha 以评估内部一致性。对五个假设进行了测试,以评估建构有效性:通过项目缩减,删除了 7 个项目,并确定了 4 个因子:结果:项目减少后,删除了七个项目,并确定了四个因子:友谊和教育、家庭满意度、日常生活和独立性以及休闲和社区生活。这些因子的 Cronbach's alpha 值介于 0.74 到 0.88 之间,表明其内部一致性可以接受。与结构效度相关的五个假设中有三个得到了支持,符合预期:PQP具有结构效度、内部一致性和建构效度。然而,还需要进一步的纵向研究来验证其长期测量特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: 5 issues per year Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信