Depth constancy and the absolute vergence anomaly

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Rebecca E. Ranson , Peter Scarfe , Loes C.J. van Dam , Paul B. Hibbard
{"title":"Depth constancy and the absolute vergence anomaly","authors":"Rebecca E. Ranson ,&nbsp;Peter Scarfe ,&nbsp;Loes C.J. van Dam ,&nbsp;Paul B. Hibbard","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2024.108501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Binocular disparity provides information about the depth structure of objects and surfaces in our environment. Since disparity depends on the distance to objects as well as the depth separation of points, information about distance is required to estimate depth from disparity. Our perception of size and shape is biased, such that far objects appear too small and flattened in depth, and near objects too big and stretched in depth. The current study assessed the extent to which the failure of depth constancy can be accounted for by the uncertainty of distance information provided by vergence. We measured individual differences in vergence noise using a nonius line task, and the degree of depth constancy using a task in which observers judged the magnitude of a depth interval relative to the vertical distance between two targets in the image plane. We found no correlation between the two measures, and show that depth constancy was much poorer than would be expected from vergence noise measured in this way. This limited ability to take account of vergence in the perception of depth is, however, consistent with our poor sensitivity to absolute disparity differences. This absolute disparity anomaly thus also applies to our poor ability to make use of vergence information for absolute distance judgements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 108501"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698924001457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Binocular disparity provides information about the depth structure of objects and surfaces in our environment. Since disparity depends on the distance to objects as well as the depth separation of points, information about distance is required to estimate depth from disparity. Our perception of size and shape is biased, such that far objects appear too small and flattened in depth, and near objects too big and stretched in depth. The current study assessed the extent to which the failure of depth constancy can be accounted for by the uncertainty of distance information provided by vergence. We measured individual differences in vergence noise using a nonius line task, and the degree of depth constancy using a task in which observers judged the magnitude of a depth interval relative to the vertical distance between two targets in the image plane. We found no correlation between the two measures, and show that depth constancy was much poorer than would be expected from vergence noise measured in this way. This limited ability to take account of vergence in the perception of depth is, however, consistent with our poor sensitivity to absolute disparity differences. This absolute disparity anomaly thus also applies to our poor ability to make use of vergence information for absolute distance judgements.
深度恒定和绝对辐辏异常。
双眼视差提供了我们所处环境中物体和表面的深度结构信息。由于视差取决于与物体的距离以及点与点之间的深度分隔,因此需要有关距离的信息才能通过视差估计深度。我们对物体大小和形状的感知是有偏差的,因此远处的物体看起来太小,深度扁平,而近处的物体则太大,深度拉伸。本研究评估了深度恒定性失效在多大程度上可以通过辐辏提供的距离信息的不确定性来解释。我们使用非半径线任务测量了辐辏噪声的个体差异,并使用一项任务测量了深度恒定性的程度,在这项任务中,观察者根据图像平面上两个目标之间的垂直距离来判断深度间隔的大小。我们发现这两种测量方法之间没有相关性,并表明深度恒定性比通过这种方法测量的辐辏噪声所预期的要差得多。然而,这种在深度知觉中考虑辐辏的有限能力与我们对绝对差距差异的低敏感度是一致的。因此,这种绝对差距异常也适用于我们利用辐辏信息进行绝对距离判断的能力差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vision Research
Vision Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信