Percutaneous decannulation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using MANTA device: A real-world single-center experience.

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ioannis Milioglou, Alice Qian, Pedro Rafael Vieira de Oliveira Salerno, Gabriel Tensol Rodrigues Pereira, Luis Augusto Palma Dallan, Kelsey E Gray, Michael Morrison, Yasir Abu-Omar, Mohammad Eldiasty, Cristian Baeza
{"title":"Percutaneous decannulation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using MANTA device: A real-world single-center experience.","authors":"Ioannis Milioglou, Alice Qian, Pedro Rafael Vieira de Oliveira Salerno, Gabriel Tensol Rodrigues Pereira, Luis Augusto Palma Dallan, Kelsey E Gray, Michael Morrison, Yasir Abu-Omar, Mohammad Eldiasty, Cristian Baeza","doi":"10.4330/wjc.v16.i10.574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The MANTA vascular closure device (VCD) represents a novel approach to achieving hemostasis after large-bore femoral access procedures. Numerous clinical studies have evaluated the efficacy of the MANTA device across a range of patient populations undergoing different procedures. However, there is still a paucity of data available concerning the use of MANTA devices in aiding the decannulation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To present our single-center experience of utilizing the MANTA VCD in patients undergoing this procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center study included all patients undergoing percutaneous decannulation of femoral VA-ECMO using the MANTA plug-based VCD between January 2021 and October 2023 at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center. Inclusion criteria were adult patients who required prolonged (> 24 hours) hemodynamic support with VA-ECMO. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, hemostasis, bleeding, limb ischemia, and site infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of 19 patients with a mean age of 56.8 years. Twelve of them were males with a mean body mass index of 29. The most common extracorporeal membrane oxygenation indication was acute coronary syndrome complicated by cardiogenic shock at 36.8%. The mean length of intensive care unit stay for these patients was 18.8 ± 8.42 days. Seventeen out of 19 patients survived to discharge. The MANTA device was successfully deployed in 19 patients, with 10 procedures conducted at the bedside and 9 in an operating room setting. Complete hemostasis was achieved within 5 minutes of MANTA deployment in 17 out of 19 patients. In 2 patients manual compression after Manta deployment was required to achieve adequate hemostasis. Additionally, acute lower extremity ischemia was noted in two patients, necessitating endovascular interventions. No infections were reported at the site of MANTA deployment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, based on our experience and that of other centers, the MANTA VCD has proven to be a simple, safe, and effective percutaneous technique for facilitating in the OR, but most of all it opens the opportunity for bedside VA-ECMO decannulation. Post-decannulation ischemic complications are higher in this series of sick patients when compared with elective procedures like transcatheter aortic valve replacement and endovascular aneurysm repair. Additionally, operators should be mindful of the incidence of ischemic complications. Distal Doppler pulse signals should always be checked, to indicate bailout options when this occurs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23800,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiology","volume":"16 10","pages":"574-579"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11525797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v16.i10.574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The MANTA vascular closure device (VCD) represents a novel approach to achieving hemostasis after large-bore femoral access procedures. Numerous clinical studies have evaluated the efficacy of the MANTA device across a range of patient populations undergoing different procedures. However, there is still a paucity of data available concerning the use of MANTA devices in aiding the decannulation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO).

Aim: To present our single-center experience of utilizing the MANTA VCD in patients undergoing this procedure.

Methods: This single-center study included all patients undergoing percutaneous decannulation of femoral VA-ECMO using the MANTA plug-based VCD between January 2021 and October 2023 at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center. Inclusion criteria were adult patients who required prolonged (> 24 hours) hemodynamic support with VA-ECMO. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, hemostasis, bleeding, limb ischemia, and site infection.

Results: This is a retrospective cohort study of 19 patients with a mean age of 56.8 years. Twelve of them were males with a mean body mass index of 29. The most common extracorporeal membrane oxygenation indication was acute coronary syndrome complicated by cardiogenic shock at 36.8%. The mean length of intensive care unit stay for these patients was 18.8 ± 8.42 days. Seventeen out of 19 patients survived to discharge. The MANTA device was successfully deployed in 19 patients, with 10 procedures conducted at the bedside and 9 in an operating room setting. Complete hemostasis was achieved within 5 minutes of MANTA deployment in 17 out of 19 patients. In 2 patients manual compression after Manta deployment was required to achieve adequate hemostasis. Additionally, acute lower extremity ischemia was noted in two patients, necessitating endovascular interventions. No infections were reported at the site of MANTA deployment.

Conclusion: Overall, based on our experience and that of other centers, the MANTA VCD has proven to be a simple, safe, and effective percutaneous technique for facilitating in the OR, but most of all it opens the opportunity for bedside VA-ECMO decannulation. Post-decannulation ischemic complications are higher in this series of sick patients when compared with elective procedures like transcatheter aortic valve replacement and endovascular aneurysm repair. Additionally, operators should be mindful of the incidence of ischemic complications. Distal Doppler pulse signals should always be checked, to indicate bailout options when this occurs.

使用 MANTA 设备对体外膜肺氧合进行经皮拔管:单中心真实体验
背景:MANTA 血管闭合器 (VCD) 是在大口径股动脉通路手术后实现止血的一种新方法。许多临床研究已经评估了 MANTA 装置对接受不同手术的患者群体的疗效。目的:介绍我们在单中心使用 MANTA VCD 为接受该手术的患者止血的经验:这项单中心研究纳入了 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 10 月期间在克利夫兰大学医院医学中心使用 MANTA 插头式 VCD 接受经皮股骨头 VA-ECMO 拔管术的所有患者。纳入标准为需要长时间(> 24 小时)使用 VA-ECMO 进行血液动力学支持的成年患者。结果包括全因死亡率、止血、出血、肢体缺血和部位感染:这是一项回顾性队列研究,共有 19 名患者参加,平均年龄 56.8 岁。其中 12 人为男性,平均体重指数为 29。最常见的体外膜氧合适应症是急性冠状动脉综合征并发心源性休克,占 36.8%。这些患者在重症监护室的平均住院时间为(18.8 ± 8.42)天。19 名患者中有 17 人存活出院。MANTA 装置成功应用于 19 名患者,其中 10 例在床边进行,9 例在手术室进行。19 名患者中有 17 人在 MANTA 装置部署后 5 分钟内实现了完全止血。有 2 名患者需要在 MANTA 部署后进行人工按压才能实现充分止血。此外,两名患者出现急性下肢缺血,需要进行血管内介入治疗。MANTA 敷设部位未发生感染:总之,根据我们和其他中心的经验,MANTA VCD 已被证明是一种简单、安全、有效的经皮技术,可用于手术室,但最重要的是,它为床旁 VA-ECMO 解除封管提供了机会。与经导管主动脉瓣置换术和血管内动脉瘤修补术等择期手术相比,在这一系列病例中,解禁后缺血并发症较高。此外,操作者应注意缺血并发症的发生率。应始终检查远端多普勒脉冲信号,以便在发生这种情况时提供救助方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Cardiology
World Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信