Epidemiology of Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients Treated With Belatacept.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Madeleine R Heldman, Jennifer L Saullo, Brandon M Menachem, Julia A Messina, Sana Arif, Julie M Steinbrink, Patrick C K Tam, Manuela Carugati, Cameron R Wolfe, Arthur W Baker, Eileen K Maziarz
{"title":"Epidemiology of Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients Treated With Belatacept.","authors":"Madeleine R Heldman, Jennifer L Saullo, Brandon M Menachem, Julia A Messina, Sana Arif, Julie M Steinbrink, Patrick C K Tam, Manuela Carugati, Cameron R Wolfe, Arthur W Baker, Eileen K Maziarz","doi":"10.1111/tid.14403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Belatacept is a costimulatory blocker that can be used to prevent and treat rejection in lung transplant recipients (LuTRs). The epidemiology of infections in belatacept-treated LuTRs has not been systematically evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-center retrospective study of all adult LuTRs who received belatacept as prevention or treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (desensitization) or as part of maintenance immunosuppression from January 1, 2011, to June 30, 2022. We assessed the epidemiology of infections that occurred within 12 months following the first belatacept dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two LuTRs received at least one dose of belatacept as either desensitization (n = 32) or maintenance immunosuppression (n = 20). Among 45 patients who were cytomegalovirus (CMV) donor and/or recipient seropositive, nine (20%) developed CMV infection. Seven (77%) CMV infections occurred despite valganciclovir prophylaxis and four (44%) were associated with antiviral resistance. Three (6%) LuTRs developed Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Twenty-five (48%) LuTRs developed 43 bacterial infections and five (10%) developed proven or probable invasive fungal disease. Incidence rates of viral, bacterial, and fungal infections were similar between the desensitization and maintenance groups: incidence rate ratios (95% confidence interval) were 0.70 (0.32-1.57), 1.31 (0.70-2.46), and 2.82 (0.31-25.2), respectively. Infection/PTLD prompted belatacept discontinuation in eight (15%) patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the first year after belatacept initiation, LuTRs commonly developed CMV infections, EBV+ PTLD, and bacterial infections. Multicenter collaborations are needed to better understand infection risks in LuTRs treated with belatacept.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e14403"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.14403","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Belatacept is a costimulatory blocker that can be used to prevent and treat rejection in lung transplant recipients (LuTRs). The epidemiology of infections in belatacept-treated LuTRs has not been systematically evaluated.

Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective study of all adult LuTRs who received belatacept as prevention or treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (desensitization) or as part of maintenance immunosuppression from January 1, 2011, to June 30, 2022. We assessed the epidemiology of infections that occurred within 12 months following the first belatacept dose.

Results: Fifty-two LuTRs received at least one dose of belatacept as either desensitization (n = 32) or maintenance immunosuppression (n = 20). Among 45 patients who were cytomegalovirus (CMV) donor and/or recipient seropositive, nine (20%) developed CMV infection. Seven (77%) CMV infections occurred despite valganciclovir prophylaxis and four (44%) were associated with antiviral resistance. Three (6%) LuTRs developed Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Twenty-five (48%) LuTRs developed 43 bacterial infections and five (10%) developed proven or probable invasive fungal disease. Incidence rates of viral, bacterial, and fungal infections were similar between the desensitization and maintenance groups: incidence rate ratios (95% confidence interval) were 0.70 (0.32-1.57), 1.31 (0.70-2.46), and 2.82 (0.31-25.2), respectively. Infection/PTLD prompted belatacept discontinuation in eight (15%) patients.

Conclusions: In the first year after belatacept initiation, LuTRs commonly developed CMV infections, EBV+ PTLD, and bacterial infections. Multicenter collaborations are needed to better understand infection risks in LuTRs treated with belatacept.

接受贝拉他赛普治疗的肺移植受者的感染流行病学。
背景贝拉替赛是一种成本刺激阻断剂,可用于预防和治疗肺移植受者(LuTR)的排斥反应。目前尚未对接受贝拉替塞治疗的肺移植受者的感染流行病学进行系统评估:我们对 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日期间接受贝拉替赛预防或治疗抗体介导的排斥反应(脱敏)或作为维持性免疫抑制的一部分的所有成年肺移植受者进行了单中心回顾性研究。我们对首次服用贝拉替赛后12个月内发生的感染流行病学进行了评估:52例LuTR患者接受了至少一剂贝拉他赛普作为脱敏治疗(32例)或维持性免疫抑制(20例)。在 45 名巨细胞病毒(CMV)供体和/或受体血清阳性的患者中,有 9 人(20%)发生了 CMV 感染。尽管采取了缬更昔洛韦预防措施,但仍有 7 例(77%)发生了 CMV 感染,4 例(44%)与抗病毒耐药有关。3例(6%)LuTR患上了与爱泼斯坦-巴氏病毒(EBV)相关的移植后淋巴组织增生性疾病(PTLD)。25例(48%)LuTR患上了43种细菌感染,5例(10%)患上了已证实或可能患上的侵袭性真菌病。脱敏组和维持组的病毒、细菌和真菌感染发病率相似:发病率比(95% 置信区间)分别为 0.70(0.32-1.57)、1.31(0.70-2.46)和 2.82(0.31-25.2)。8例(15%)患者因感染/PLD而停用贝拉坦普:结论:开始使用贝拉坦普后的第一年,LuTR患者通常会出现CMV感染、EBV+ PTLD和细菌感染。要更好地了解接受贝拉替塞治疗的LuTR患者的感染风险,需要多中心合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplant Infectious Disease
Transplant Infectious Disease 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
210
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal. Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信