Phylogenetic and taxonomic revisions of Jurassic sea stars support a delayed evolutionary origin of the Asteriidae.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj.18169
Marine Fau, David F Wright, Timothy A M Ewin, Andrew S Gale, Loïc Villier
{"title":"Phylogenetic and taxonomic revisions of Jurassic sea stars support a delayed evolutionary origin of the Asteriidae.","authors":"Marine Fau, David F Wright, Timothy A M Ewin, Andrew S Gale, Loïc Villier","doi":"10.7717/peerj.18169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The superorder Forcipulatacea is a major clade of sea stars with approximately 400 extant species across three orders (Forcipulatida, Brisingida, Zorocallida). Over the past century, the systematics of Forcipulatacea have undergone multiple revisions by various authors, with some considering numerous families such as Asteriidae, Zoroasteridae, Pedicellasteridae, Stichasteridae, Heliasteridae, Labidiasteridae, and Neomorphasteridae, while others recognized only two families (<i>i.e</i>., Asteriidae and Zoroasteridae). Recent molecular analyses have shown the artificial nature of some of these groupings. Notably, four well-supported clades (Zorocallida, Brisingida, Stichasteridae, and Asteriidae) emerged from a synthesis of morphological and molecular evidence. The majority of extinct forcipulatacean species have been placed in modern families. However, many of these fossil species are in need of revision, especially those species placed within the Asteriidae, the largest of all forcipulatacean families.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In light of recent advancements in forcipulatacean systematics, we comprehensively reassess six well-preserved Jurassic forcipulatacean taxa, including the earliest crown-group members from the Hettangian (∼201.4 Ma), and also describe two new Jurassic genera, <i>Forbesasterias</i> gen. nov. and <i>Marbleaster</i> gen. nov. We assembled the largest and most comprehensive phylogenetic matrix for this group, sampling 42 fossil and extant forcipulatacean species for 120 morphological characters. To infer phylogenetic relationships and construct an evolutionary timeline for the diversification of major clades, we conducted a Bayesian tip-dating analysis incorporating the fossilized birth-death process. A total of 13 fossil species were sampled in our analysis, including six taxonomically revaluated herein, two recently reappraised species from the Jurassic, and five additional species from the Cretaceous and Miocene.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Contrary to prior assumptions, our results indicate that none of the Jurassic taxa investigated belong to Asteriidae or any other modern families, and instead represent stem-forcipulatids. Furthermore, our phylogenetic results suggest that Asteriidae likely originated during the late Cretaceous. Our findings highlight a greater early diversity within the Forcipulatacea than previously presumed, challenging existing perceptions of the evolutionary history of this significant clade of marine invertebrates.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The superorder Forcipulatacea is a major clade of sea stars with approximately 400 extant species across three orders (Forcipulatida, Brisingida, Zorocallida). Over the past century, the systematics of Forcipulatacea have undergone multiple revisions by various authors, with some considering numerous families such as Asteriidae, Zoroasteridae, Pedicellasteridae, Stichasteridae, Heliasteridae, Labidiasteridae, and Neomorphasteridae, while others recognized only two families (i.e., Asteriidae and Zoroasteridae). Recent molecular analyses have shown the artificial nature of some of these groupings. Notably, four well-supported clades (Zorocallida, Brisingida, Stichasteridae, and Asteriidae) emerged from a synthesis of morphological and molecular evidence. The majority of extinct forcipulatacean species have been placed in modern families. However, many of these fossil species are in need of revision, especially those species placed within the Asteriidae, the largest of all forcipulatacean families.

Methods: In light of recent advancements in forcipulatacean systematics, we comprehensively reassess six well-preserved Jurassic forcipulatacean taxa, including the earliest crown-group members from the Hettangian (∼201.4 Ma), and also describe two new Jurassic genera, Forbesasterias gen. nov. and Marbleaster gen. nov. We assembled the largest and most comprehensive phylogenetic matrix for this group, sampling 42 fossil and extant forcipulatacean species for 120 morphological characters. To infer phylogenetic relationships and construct an evolutionary timeline for the diversification of major clades, we conducted a Bayesian tip-dating analysis incorporating the fossilized birth-death process. A total of 13 fossil species were sampled in our analysis, including six taxonomically revaluated herein, two recently reappraised species from the Jurassic, and five additional species from the Cretaceous and Miocene.

Results: Contrary to prior assumptions, our results indicate that none of the Jurassic taxa investigated belong to Asteriidae or any other modern families, and instead represent stem-forcipulatids. Furthermore, our phylogenetic results suggest that Asteriidae likely originated during the late Cretaceous. Our findings highlight a greater early diversity within the Forcipulatacea than previously presumed, challenging existing perceptions of the evolutionary history of this significant clade of marine invertebrates.

侏罗纪海星的系统发育和分类学修订支持海星科(Asteriidae)的延迟进化起源。
背景:海星超目(Forcipulatacea)是海星的一个主要支系,共有三个目(海星目(Forcipulatida)、海星科(Brisingida)、海星属(Zorocallida)),约 400 个现存物种。在过去的一个世纪中,Forcipulatacea 的系统学经历了多位学者的多次修订,其中一些学者认为 Forcipulatacea 有许多科,如 Asteriidae、Zoroasteridae、Pedicellasteridae、Stichasteridae、Heliasteridae、Labidiasteridae 和 Neomorphasteridae,而另一些学者则认为 Forcipulatacea 只有两个科(即 Asteriidae 和 Zoroasteridae)。最近的分子分析表明了其中一些分类的人为性质。值得注意的是,根据形态学和分子证据的综合分析,出现了 4 个得到很好支持的支系(Zorocallida、Brisingida、Stichasteridae 和 Asteriidae)。大部分已灭绝的栉水母类物种被归入现代科。然而,这些化石物种中有许多需要修正,尤其是那些被归入蛙形目中最大的科--蛙科的物种:根据蛙形目动物系统学的最新进展,我们对六个保存完好的侏罗纪蛙形目动物分类群进行了全面的重新评估,其中包括来自赫坦纪(∼201.4 Ma)的最早的冠群成员,同时还描述了两个侏罗纪新属:Forbesasterias gen.我们对 42 个化石物种和现生的桡足类物种的 120 个形态特征进行了取样,为该类群建立了最大、最全面的系统发生矩阵。为了推断系统发育关系和构建主要支系多样化的进化时间表,我们结合化石的出生-死亡过程进行了贝叶斯尖端定年分析。我们的分析共采集了 13 个化石物种的样本,其中包括 6 个在分类学上被重新评估的物种、2 个最近被重新评估的侏罗纪物种以及另外 5 个白垩纪和中新世物种:与之前的假设相反,我们的研究结果表明,所调查的侏罗纪类群中没有一个属于Asteriidae或任何其他现代科,而是代表了茎蛙类。此外,我们的系统发育结果表明,Asteriidae很可能起源于白垩纪晚期。我们的研究结果突显了栉水母纲的早期多样性比以前推测的要多,这对这一重要的海洋无脊椎动物支系进化史的现有看法提出了挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信