Genomic evaluation of the probiotic and pathogenic features of Enterococcus faecalis from human breast milk and comparison with the isolates from animal milk and clinical specimens.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj.18392
Lobna Badr, Muhammad Yasir, Areej A Alkhaldy, Samah A Soliman, Magdah Ganash, Safaa A Turkistani, Asif A Jiman-Fatani, Ibrahim A Al-Zahrani, Esam I Azhar
{"title":"Genomic evaluation of the probiotic and pathogenic features of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> from human breast milk and comparison with the isolates from animal milk and clinical specimens.","authors":"Lobna Badr, Muhammad Yasir, Areej A Alkhaldy, Samah A Soliman, Magdah Ganash, Safaa A Turkistani, Asif A Jiman-Fatani, Ibrahim A Al-Zahrani, Esam I Azhar","doi":"10.7717/peerj.18392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> is considered a probiotic, commensal lactic acid bacterium in human breast milk (HBM), but there are circulating antibiotic resistant and virulence determinants that could pose a risk in some strains. The study aimed to conduct genomic analysis of <i>E. faecalis</i> isolates recovered from HBM and animal milk and to evaluate their probiotic and pathogenic features through comparative genomics with isolates from clinical specimens (<i>e.g</i>., urine, wound, and blood). Genomic analysis of 61 isolates was performed, including <i>E. faecalis</i> isolates recovered from HBM in Saudi Arabia. Genome sequencing was conducted using the MiSeq system. The fewest antibiotic resistance genes (<i>lsaA</i>, <i>tetM</i>, <i>ermB</i>) were identified in isolates from HBM and animal milk compared to clinical isolates. Several known and unknown mutations in the <i>gyrA</i> and <i>parC</i> genes were observed in clinical isolates. However, 11 virulence genes were commonly found in more than 95% of isolates, and 13 virulence genes were consistently present in the HBM isolates. Phylogenetically, the HBM isolates from China clustered with the probiotic reference strain Symbioflor 1, but all isolates from HBM and animal milk clustered separately from the clinical reference strain V583. Subsystem functions 188 of 263 were common in all analyzed genome assemblies. Regardless of the source of isolation, genes associated with carbohydrate metabolism, fatty acid, and vitamin biosynthesis were commonly found in <i>E. faecalis</i> isolates. In conclusion, comparative genomic analysis can help distinguish the probiotic or pathogenic potential of <i>E. faecalis</i> based on genomic features.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enterococcus faecalis is considered a probiotic, commensal lactic acid bacterium in human breast milk (HBM), but there are circulating antibiotic resistant and virulence determinants that could pose a risk in some strains. The study aimed to conduct genomic analysis of E. faecalis isolates recovered from HBM and animal milk and to evaluate their probiotic and pathogenic features through comparative genomics with isolates from clinical specimens (e.g., urine, wound, and blood). Genomic analysis of 61 isolates was performed, including E. faecalis isolates recovered from HBM in Saudi Arabia. Genome sequencing was conducted using the MiSeq system. The fewest antibiotic resistance genes (lsaA, tetM, ermB) were identified in isolates from HBM and animal milk compared to clinical isolates. Several known and unknown mutations in the gyrA and parC genes were observed in clinical isolates. However, 11 virulence genes were commonly found in more than 95% of isolates, and 13 virulence genes were consistently present in the HBM isolates. Phylogenetically, the HBM isolates from China clustered with the probiotic reference strain Symbioflor 1, but all isolates from HBM and animal milk clustered separately from the clinical reference strain V583. Subsystem functions 188 of 263 were common in all analyzed genome assemblies. Regardless of the source of isolation, genes associated with carbohydrate metabolism, fatty acid, and vitamin biosynthesis were commonly found in E. faecalis isolates. In conclusion, comparative genomic analysis can help distinguish the probiotic or pathogenic potential of E. faecalis based on genomic features.

对母乳中粪肠球菌的益生菌和致病菌特征进行基因组学评估,并与动物乳汁和临床标本中的分离物进行比较。
粪肠球菌(Enterococcus faecalis)被认为是母乳(HBM)中的益生菌、共生乳酸菌,但一些菌株中存在抗生素耐药性和致病性决定因子,可能会带来风险。该研究旨在对从 HBM 和动物乳汁中分离出的粪肠球菌进行基因组分析,并通过与临床样本(如尿液、伤口和血液)中分离出的菌株进行基因组比较,评估其益生菌和致病菌特征。对 61 个分离物进行了基因组分析,其中包括从沙特阿拉伯的 HBM 中分离出的粪肠球菌。基因组测序使用 MiSeq 系统进行。与临床分离物相比,从 HBM 和动物奶中分离出的粪肠球菌鉴定出的抗生素耐药基因(lsaA、tetM、ermB)最少。在临床分离株中观察到了gyrA和parC基因的几个已知和未知突变。然而,在超过 95% 的分离株中普遍发现了 11 个毒力基因,在 HBM 分离株中持续存在 13 个毒力基因。在系统发育上,来自中国的 HBM 分离物与益生菌参考菌株 Symbioflor 1 聚类,但来自 HBM 和动物奶的所有分离物都与临床参考菌株 V583 分开聚类。在所有分析的基因组组装中,263 个子系统功能中有 188 个是共同的。无论分离来源如何,与碳水化合物代谢、脂肪酸和维生素生物合成相关的基因在粪肠球菌分离物中都很常见。总之,比较基因组分析有助于根据基因组特征区分粪肠球菌是益生菌还是致病菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信