High-frequency whole blood donation and its impact on mortality: Evidence from a data linkage study in Australia.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1111/trf.18049
Md Morshadur Rahman, Surendra Karki, Andrew Hayen
{"title":"High-frequency whole blood donation and its impact on mortality: Evidence from a data linkage study in Australia.","authors":"Md Morshadur Rahman, Surendra Karki, Andrew Hayen","doi":"10.1111/trf.18049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous reports suggest that blood donors have a lower mortality risk, which may partially reflect the \"healthy donor effect\" (HDE). HDE arises in donors due to selection bias and confounding if not appropriately addressed.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Using the Sax Institute's 45 and Up Study data linked with blood donation history, we used a \"5-year exposure window\" method to select donors into regular high-frequency whole blood (WB)donors (at least two donations per exposure year) and low-frequency donors (remaining donors) with an active donation career of 5 years. To further reduce the confounding, we used statistical approaches like the inverse probability weighted (IPW) marginal structural model and the doubly robust targeted minimum loss-based estimator (TMLE), which incorporated machine learning algorithms and time-varying analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We selected 4750 (64.7%) low-frequency and 2588 (35.3%) high-frequency donors in the analyses. A total of 69 (1.5%) from the low-frequency and 45 (1.7%) donors from the regular high-frequency group died during the 7-year follow-up period. We did not find any statistically significant association between regular high-frequency blood donation and mortality (IPW RR = 0.98 95% CI 0.68, 1.28). TMLE model also showed similar results to IPW (RR = 0.97 95% CI 0.80, 1.16). Time-varying TMLE did not find any significant association between high-frequency donation and all-cause mortality either (RR = 0.98 95% 0.74, 1.29).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not find a significant association between regular high-frequency WB donation and all-cause mortality when appropriate methods were employed to minimize the HDE.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous reports suggest that blood donors have a lower mortality risk, which may partially reflect the "healthy donor effect" (HDE). HDE arises in donors due to selection bias and confounding if not appropriately addressed.

Study design and methods: Using the Sax Institute's 45 and Up Study data linked with blood donation history, we used a "5-year exposure window" method to select donors into regular high-frequency whole blood (WB)donors (at least two donations per exposure year) and low-frequency donors (remaining donors) with an active donation career of 5 years. To further reduce the confounding, we used statistical approaches like the inverse probability weighted (IPW) marginal structural model and the doubly robust targeted minimum loss-based estimator (TMLE), which incorporated machine learning algorithms and time-varying analyses.

Results: We selected 4750 (64.7%) low-frequency and 2588 (35.3%) high-frequency donors in the analyses. A total of 69 (1.5%) from the low-frequency and 45 (1.7%) donors from the regular high-frequency group died during the 7-year follow-up period. We did not find any statistically significant association between regular high-frequency blood donation and mortality (IPW RR = 0.98 95% CI 0.68, 1.28). TMLE model also showed similar results to IPW (RR = 0.97 95% CI 0.80, 1.16). Time-varying TMLE did not find any significant association between high-frequency donation and all-cause mortality either (RR = 0.98 95% 0.74, 1.29).

Conclusions: We did not find a significant association between regular high-frequency WB donation and all-cause mortality when appropriate methods were employed to minimize the HDE.

高频率全血捐赠及其对死亡率的影响:来自澳大利亚数据关联研究的证据。
背景:以往的报告显示,献血者的死亡风险较低,这可能部分反映了 "健康献血者效应"(HDE)。如果不适当解决选择偏差和混杂问题,献血者中就会出现 HDE:我们利用萨克斯研究所(Sax Institute)的 "45岁及以上研究"(45 and Up Study)中与献血史相关联的数据,采用 "5年暴露窗口 "法将献血者分为定期高频率全血(WB)献血者(每个暴露年至少献血两次)和低频率献血者(其余献血者),他们的献血年限均为5年。为了进一步减少混杂因素,我们采用了反概率加权(IPW)边际结构模型和双重稳健目标最小损失估计器(TMLE)等统计方法,其中包含机器学习算法和时变分析:我们选择了 4750 例(64.7%)低频捐献者和 2588 例(35.3%)高频捐献者进行分析。在 7 年的随访期间,共有 69 名低频捐献者(1.5%)和 45 名常规高频捐献者(1.7%)死亡。我们没有发现定期高频献血与死亡率之间有任何统计学意义上的关联(IPW RR = 0.98 95% CI 0.68, 1.28)。TMLE 模型也显示出与 IPW 相似的结果(RR = 0.97 95% CI 0.80,1.16)。时变 TMLE 也未发现高频捐赠与全因死亡率之间有任何显著关联(RR = 0.98 95% 0.74, 1.29):如果采用适当的方法将 HDE 降到最低,我们没有发现定期高频率的世行捐赠与全因死亡率之间存在明显的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信