The Combined Use of High Pressure Processing and Lactic Acid Containing Fermentate on Inactivation of Salmonella, Shiga Toxin-producing E. coli, and Listeria monocytogenes in Raw Pet Foods
IF 2.1 4区 农林科学Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Alvin Lee , Nicole Maks-Warren , Viviana Aguilar , Brittany Swicegood , Lindsay Halik , Joshua Warren , Edward O’Neill , Jason Meents , Susy Tejayadi
{"title":"The Combined Use of High Pressure Processing and Lactic Acid Containing Fermentate on Inactivation of Salmonella, Shiga Toxin-producing E. coli, and Listeria monocytogenes in Raw Pet Foods","authors":"Alvin Lee , Nicole Maks-Warren , Viviana Aguilar , Brittany Swicegood , Lindsay Halik , Joshua Warren , Edward O’Neill , Jason Meents , Susy Tejayadi","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Raw meat pet foods can pose health risks to pets and humans. High-pressure processing (HPP) was used in a previous study to demonstrate its effectiveness in achieving a 5-log reduction of <em>Salmonella</em>, <em>E. coli</em> STEC, and <em>L. monocytogenes</em> in commercially available raw pet foods and maintaining the 5-log reduction throughout shelf-life with frozen storage being more effective than refrigerated. <em>L. monocytogenes</em>, being more HPP resistant, could potentially regrow when stored at refrigeration temperatures and required further optimization. Chicken-based raw diet pet food was inoculated with 7–8 log CFU/g cocktails of <em>Salmonella</em> spp., <em>E. coli</em> STEC, or <em>L. monocytogenes</em> and stored at 4 °C for 24 h before the addition of either 0.7% or 1.0% w/v lactic acid fermentate (LAF) and HPP treated at 586 MPa for 2, 3, and 4 min after 24 or 72 h storage at 4 °C. HPP-treated products were stored frozen (−10 to −16 °C) up to 21 days with microbiological analyses on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 21. All HPP-and LAF-treated samples demonstrated a 5-log reduction of <em>Salmonella</em> spp., <em>E. coli</em> STEC, and <em>L. monocytogenes</em>. Samples without LAF and HPP treated after 24 h storage at 4 °C resulted in an average 4.02 log cfu/g reduction of <em>L. monocytogenes</em> with 2 min HPP hold time while longer HPP hold times at 4 min improved <em>L. monocytogenes</em> reduction by 0.35 log cfu/g. <em>E. coli</em> was found to be more HPP resistant in this study than <em>L. monocytogenes</em> and the addition of LAF had a significant impact on the overall pathogen survival during post-HPP storage. Based on qualitative enrichment data for each pathogen, the use of LAF resulted in more complete inactivation compared to samples without LAF. The use of 1% LAF in combination with 586 MPa for 4 min was found to be most effective for the inactivation of <em>Salmonella</em> spp., <em>E. coli</em> STEC, and <em>L. monocytogenes</em>. The findings are significant as it provides both formulation and processing controls to ensure the safety of raw diet pet foods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"87 12","pages":"Article 100390"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001741","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Raw meat pet foods can pose health risks to pets and humans. High-pressure processing (HPP) was used in a previous study to demonstrate its effectiveness in achieving a 5-log reduction of Salmonella, E. coli STEC, and L. monocytogenes in commercially available raw pet foods and maintaining the 5-log reduction throughout shelf-life with frozen storage being more effective than refrigerated. L. monocytogenes, being more HPP resistant, could potentially regrow when stored at refrigeration temperatures and required further optimization. Chicken-based raw diet pet food was inoculated with 7–8 log CFU/g cocktails of Salmonella spp., E. coli STEC, or L. monocytogenes and stored at 4 °C for 24 h before the addition of either 0.7% or 1.0% w/v lactic acid fermentate (LAF) and HPP treated at 586 MPa for 2, 3, and 4 min after 24 or 72 h storage at 4 °C. HPP-treated products were stored frozen (−10 to −16 °C) up to 21 days with microbiological analyses on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 21. All HPP-and LAF-treated samples demonstrated a 5-log reduction of Salmonella spp., E. coli STEC, and L. monocytogenes. Samples without LAF and HPP treated after 24 h storage at 4 °C resulted in an average 4.02 log cfu/g reduction of L. monocytogenes with 2 min HPP hold time while longer HPP hold times at 4 min improved L. monocytogenes reduction by 0.35 log cfu/g. E. coli was found to be more HPP resistant in this study than L. monocytogenes and the addition of LAF had a significant impact on the overall pathogen survival during post-HPP storage. Based on qualitative enrichment data for each pathogen, the use of LAF resulted in more complete inactivation compared to samples without LAF. The use of 1% LAF in combination with 586 MPa for 4 min was found to be most effective for the inactivation of Salmonella spp., E. coli STEC, and L. monocytogenes. The findings are significant as it provides both formulation and processing controls to ensure the safety of raw diet pet foods.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.