Environmental Monitoring of Nebraska Ready-to-eat Meat Processing Establishments Resulted in the Isolation of Listeria Alongside Pseudomonas Highly Resistant to Quaternary Ammonia Sanitizer

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Samuel C. Watson , Alison C. Neujahr , Byron D. Chaves , Samodha C. Fernando , Gary A. Sullivan
{"title":"Environmental Monitoring of Nebraska Ready-to-eat Meat Processing Establishments Resulted in the Isolation of Listeria Alongside Pseudomonas Highly Resistant to Quaternary Ammonia Sanitizer","authors":"Samuel C. Watson ,&nbsp;Alison C. Neujahr ,&nbsp;Byron D. Chaves ,&nbsp;Samodha C. Fernando ,&nbsp;Gary A. Sullivan","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Robust environmental monitoring for <em>Listeria monocytogenes</em> often may not be feasible for small and very small meat processors in the United States due to the limitations in finances, staffing, or expertise. Three small/very small processors in Nebraska were sampled using sponge applicators in nonfood contact surface areas to determine if biofilm and sanitizer resistance behaviors of <em>Pseudomonas</em> could relate to the prevalence of <em>L. monocytogenes</em> and <em>Listeria</em> spp. in ready-to-eat meat processing environments. Samples were 3.3% (3/90) positive for <em>L. monocytogenes,</em> and 12.2% (11/90) of samples were positive for <em>Listeria</em> spp. <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. were also isolated. When <em>Listeria</em> spp. and <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. were assayed for biofilm production and resistance to a quaternary ammonia sanitizer, multiple isolates belonging to both genera capable of forming biofilms were identified. Four <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. isolates resisted the 200 ppm manufacturer-recommended sanitizer concentration for food contact surface sanitation, and one <em>Pseudomonas</em> spp. isolated from a drain sample that was also positive for <em>L. monocytogenes</em> demonstrated a sanitizer minimum bactericidal concentration of 1000 ppm. These findings further support the need for monitoring of small and very small meat processors for <em>L. monocytogenes</em> as well as highlight the need to identify other bacteria in these processing environments, like <em>Pseudomonas,</em> that are resistant to environmental stressors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"87 12","pages":"Article 100391"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001753","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robust environmental monitoring for Listeria monocytogenes often may not be feasible for small and very small meat processors in the United States due to the limitations in finances, staffing, or expertise. Three small/very small processors in Nebraska were sampled using sponge applicators in nonfood contact surface areas to determine if biofilm and sanitizer resistance behaviors of Pseudomonas could relate to the prevalence of L. monocytogenes and Listeria spp. in ready-to-eat meat processing environments. Samples were 3.3% (3/90) positive for L. monocytogenes, and 12.2% (11/90) of samples were positive for Listeria spp. Pseudomonas spp. were also isolated. When Listeria spp. and Pseudomonas spp. were assayed for biofilm production and resistance to a quaternary ammonia sanitizer, multiple isolates belonging to both genera capable of forming biofilms were identified. Four Pseudomonas spp. isolates resisted the 200 ppm manufacturer-recommended sanitizer concentration for food contact surface sanitation, and one Pseudomonas spp. isolated from a drain sample that was also positive for L. monocytogenes demonstrated a sanitizer minimum bactericidal concentration of 1000 ppm. These findings further support the need for monitoring of small and very small meat processors for L. monocytogenes as well as highlight the need to identify other bacteria in these processing environments, like Pseudomonas, that are resistant to environmental stressors.
通过对内布拉斯加州即食肉类加工企业进行环境监测,分离出了李斯特菌和对季氨消毒剂高度耐药的假单胞菌。
在美国,由于资金、人员或专业知识等方面的限制,对小型和超小型肉类加工厂进行李斯特菌环境监测往往是不可行的。我们使用海绵涂抹器对内布拉斯加州的三家小型/超小型肉类加工厂的非食品接触表面区域进行了采样,以确定假单胞菌的生物膜和耐消毒剂行为是否与即食肉类加工环境中的单增李斯特菌和李斯特菌属的流行有关。3.3%(3/90)的样本对单增李斯特菌呈阳性反应,12.2%(11/90)的样本对李斯特菌呈阳性反应。在对李斯特菌属和假单胞菌属进行生物膜生成和对季氨消毒剂的耐药性检测时,发现了属于这两个菌属的多个能形成生物膜的分离物。四种假单胞菌属分离物对制造商推荐的用于食品接触表面消毒的 200 ppm 消毒剂浓度具有抗性,从单核细胞增多症阳性的下水道样本中分离出的一种假单胞菌属的消毒剂最低杀菌浓度为 1000 ppm。这些发现进一步支持了对小型和超小型肉类加工厂进行单核细胞增多症监测的必要性,并强调了在这些加工环境中识别其他细菌(如假单胞菌)的必要性,这些细菌对环境压力具有抵抗力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信