Comprehensive Dynamic 3-Dimensional Analysis of the Tricuspid Valve in Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation: Implications for Prophylactic Tricuspid Valve Intervention.

Abstract

Objectives: To track and measure changes in the tricuspid annulus (TA) using 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography during a complete cardiac cycle in patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) compared to patients without TR, and to compare tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) derived from 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D coordinates as a measure of right ventricular (RV) function to the standard method of 2D fractional area change (FAC).

Design: Intraoperative 3D echocardiography data were collected prospectively, followed by postprocessing software analysis to track and reconstruct changes throughout the cardiac cycle.

Setting: Data were collected from 108 patients undergoing left-sided heart surgery at 2 large academic centers-Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, MA and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI-between November 2018 and April 2020.

Participants: The final dataset (n = 92) included 2 groups: the no significant functional TR (NTR) group (n = 74), defined as ≤ mild TR and TA <35 mm, and the significant functional TR (FTR) group (n = 18), defined as ≥ moderate TR.

Interventions: 3D TEE datasets were analyzed, and the motion of TA coordinates was tracked during complete cardiac cycle in 2D and 3D planes using postprocessing and software analysis. Computational modeling of TA motion was performed using computer-aided design. In further analysis, reconstructed and 3D printed models of TV were developed for the 2 groups.

Measurements and main results: `Patients in FTR group had larger TA size during the cardiac cycle, with less overall excursion and reduced annular dynamism. The 3D motion of TA for lateral, anterolateral, and posterolateral coordinates was lower in the FTR group compared to the NTR group [18 ± 6.8 vs 13.6 ± 8.5( p = 0.02); 15.2 ± 5.5 vs 11.3 ± 6.0 (p = 0.009); and 17.6 ± 6.6 vs 12.3 ± 5.2 (p = 0.002), respectively]. TAPSE derived from 3D planes was more accurate for RV function assessment when comapred with 2D FAC (area under the curve [AUC], 0.704; p = 0.011) than 2D TAPSE (AUC, 0.625; p = 0.129). Finally, in the FTR group, the anteroseptal-posterolateral diameter was consistently larger during all phases of the cardiac cycle compared to the conventionally measured septolateral diameter.

Conclusions: 3D echocardiographic assessment of TA helps better understand its geometry and dynamism in functional TR and is more accurate than 2D measurements for RV function assessment.