Dengue fever in immunocompromised patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objectives

Given the complex role of immunity in dengue severity, we aimed to review the clinical course of dengue infection in immunocompromised patients.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting outcomes among immunocompromised patients with laboratory-confirmed dengue infection. Meta-analysis using the Mantel-Haenszel method (fixed effects) was performed for studies with control groups. We registered the study with PROSPERO (No. CRD42021258930).

Results

We included 115 studies. Among these, 30 studies compared immunocompromised (cases) and nonimmunocompromised (control) patients, focusing mainly on children (n = 22 studies) with malnutrition (n=18). Immunocompromised patients had a higher likelihood of dengue complications (OR 1.87; 95% CI: 1.04-3.35]) but a lower likelihood of severe dengue (OR 0.83; 95% CI: 0.69-1.00]. No significant difference in mortality was observed. In the 85 studies focused solely on immunocompromised patients, severe dengue and mortality rates were 9% and 4%, respectively, mostly among adult solid organ transplant recipients and those with inflammatory diseases. Immunosuppressive treatment alterations and temporary graft dysfunction were reported.

Conclusion

Immunocompromised patients have an increased risk of dengue-related complications. However, definitive conclusions about the comparative severity of dengue across different immunocompromised patient groups are limited by a lack of robust data, highlighting the need for well-designed future studies.