Association Between Patient-Reported Enablement and Customer Satisfaction in 140 055 Primary Care Patients After Doctor Appointment.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735241293631
Antti-Jussi Ämmälä, Simo Taimela
{"title":"Association Between Patient-Reported Enablement and Customer Satisfaction in 140 055 Primary Care Patients After Doctor Appointment.","authors":"Antti-Jussi Ämmälä, Simo Taimela","doi":"10.1177/23743735241293631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Customer satisfaction and enablement are key facets of healthcare quality. We examined their interplay within a large sample of predominantly working-age primary care patients. Our dataset encompasses 140 055 customer satisfaction reports, with concurrently gathered measures of patient enablement, delivered after doctor appointments. We used the customer satisfaction (CSAT) score and the patient enablement instrument (PEI). Additionally, we assessed 3 dimensions of customer satisfaction in conjunction with the CSAT score and calculated a sum score. Age and gender were included as covariates. Our findings from linear regression analyses are twofold: (1) customer satisfaction and enablement are interconnected, yet they maintain a degree of distinctiveness, as indicated by a beta coefficient of 0.45 on a 5-point scale, and (2) within the customer experience on a dichotomous scale, negative experiences exert a more substantial impact (betas between -0.77 and -0.97) on enablement than positive experiences (betas between 0.24 and 0.40). In addition, a dose-response relationship was observed between the sum of customer experiences and PEI. Ensuring that patients' voices are acknowledged, their queries are addressed, and they have comprehensible guidance regarding the progression of their treatment, are fundamental aspects of interactions with patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"11 ","pages":"23743735241293631"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528676/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241293631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Customer satisfaction and enablement are key facets of healthcare quality. We examined their interplay within a large sample of predominantly working-age primary care patients. Our dataset encompasses 140 055 customer satisfaction reports, with concurrently gathered measures of patient enablement, delivered after doctor appointments. We used the customer satisfaction (CSAT) score and the patient enablement instrument (PEI). Additionally, we assessed 3 dimensions of customer satisfaction in conjunction with the CSAT score and calculated a sum score. Age and gender were included as covariates. Our findings from linear regression analyses are twofold: (1) customer satisfaction and enablement are interconnected, yet they maintain a degree of distinctiveness, as indicated by a beta coefficient of 0.45 on a 5-point scale, and (2) within the customer experience on a dichotomous scale, negative experiences exert a more substantial impact (betas between -0.77 and -0.97) on enablement than positive experiences (betas between 0.24 and 0.40). In addition, a dose-response relationship was observed between the sum of customer experiences and PEI. Ensuring that patients' voices are acknowledged, their queries are addressed, and they have comprehensible guidance regarding the progression of their treatment, are fundamental aspects of interactions with patients.

140 055 名初级保健患者就诊后的患者报告能力与客户满意度之间的关系。
客户满意度和能力是医疗质量的关键因素。我们在一个以工龄初级保健患者为主的大样本中研究了它们之间的相互作用。我们的数据集包括 140 055 份客户满意度报告,同时还收集了医生预约后提供的患者能力测量数据。我们使用了客户满意度(CSAT)评分和患者支持工具(PEI)。此外,我们还结合 CSAT 分数评估了客户满意度的 3 个维度,并计算了总分。年龄和性别被列为协变量。我们通过线性回归分析得出了两方面的结论:(1) 客户满意度和提高能力是相互关联的,但它们在一定程度上又保持着各自的独特性,在 5 点量表上的贝塔系数为 0.45;(2) 在二分量表的客户体验中,负面体验对提高能力的影响(贝塔系数在 -0.77 和 -0.97 之间)要大于正面体验(贝塔系数在 0.24 和 0.40 之间)。此外,还观察到客户体验总和与 PEI 之间存在剂量-反应关系。确保患者的声音得到认可、他们的疑问得到解决、他们在治疗进展方面得到可理解的指导,是与患者互动的基本方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信