Effect of CYP3A5*3 genotype on exposure and efficacy of quetiapine: A retrospective, cohort study

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yan Zhao , Yupei Hao , Ziyi Wang, Shuai Liu, Shizhao Yuan, Chunhua Zhou, Jing Yu
{"title":"Effect of CYP3A5*3 genotype on exposure and efficacy of quetiapine: A retrospective, cohort study","authors":"Yan Zhao ,&nbsp;Yupei Hao ,&nbsp;Ziyi Wang,&nbsp;Shuai Liu,&nbsp;Shizhao Yuan,&nbsp;Chunhua Zhou,&nbsp;Jing Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The involvement of cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) in the metabolism of quetiapine has been proposed, though conclusive evidence is lacking. This study aimed to quantitatively assess the impact of CYP3A5 genetic variability on quetiapine exposure in a Chinese patient population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patient data were retrospectively collected from the database of the Mental Health Centre at the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, covering the period from September 1, 2019, to July 1, 2023. The study included patients genotyped for CYP3A5 who were treated with quetiapine. Inclusion criteria for the analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters, such as serum concentrations of the drug and its metabolites, included oral administration of quetiapine, availability of information on the prescribed daily dose and concomitant medications, and the determination of steady-state blood levels at the time of sampling (after at least 3 days of continuous administration at the same dose). Exclusion criteria comprised polypharmacy with known CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors, as well as patients with hepatic or renal insufficiency. The primary endpoint was the exposure to quetiapine and N-dealkylquetiapine, measured using dose-corrected concentrations (C/D). The secondary endpoint was the metabolism of quetiapine to N-dealkylquetiapine, assessed by the ratio of metabolite to parent drug concentrations. The third endpoint is the differences in adverse reactions, QTc intervals, and biochemical parameters among patients with different CYP3A5 genotypes.</div></div><div><h3>Result</h3><div>Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, clinical data from 207 patients were ultimately included in the study. Of these, 20 patients had the CYP3A5*1/*1 genotype, 78 had the CYP3A5*1/*3 genotype, and 109 had the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype. The CYP3A5*3 variant was found to significantly impact the metabolism of quetiapine. The C/D values for both quetiapine and N-dealkyl quetiapine were notably higher in individuals with the *3/*3 genotype compared to those with the *1/*1 and *1/*3 genotypes (<em>P<sub>1</sub></em> &lt; 0.001 and <em>P<sub>2</sub></em> = 0.002, respectively). A comparison of the variability in metabolic ratios among different genotype groups revealed no significant difference (<em>P</em> = 0.067). However, a post hoc analysis indicated that the metabolic ratio in poor metabolizers was significantly lower than that in intermediate metabolizers (<em>P</em> = 0.021). The analysis of adverse reaction incidence and QTc intervals among different genotypes showed no statistically significant differences (<em>P</em> = 0.652, <em>P</em> = 0.486). However, comparison of biochemical parameters across different genotype groups revealed that alanine aminotransferase, uric acid, hemoglobin, and gamma-glutamyl transferase levels were significantly higher in patients with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype compared to those with the CYP3A5*1/*1 and CYP3A5*1/*3 genotypes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results indicated that the genetic polymorphism of CYP3A5*3 significantly influences the metabolism of quetiapine. Specifically, carriers of the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype exhibited higher blood levels of quetiapine, with a greater likelihood of these levels exceeding the therapeutic range. This finding underscores the need for clinicians to pay special attention to the efficacy and occurrence of adverse reactions when prescribing quetiapine to patients carrying the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"370 ","pages":"Pages 134-139"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032724018068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The involvement of cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) in the metabolism of quetiapine has been proposed, though conclusive evidence is lacking. This study aimed to quantitatively assess the impact of CYP3A5 genetic variability on quetiapine exposure in a Chinese patient population.

Methods

Patient data were retrospectively collected from the database of the Mental Health Centre at the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, covering the period from September 1, 2019, to July 1, 2023. The study included patients genotyped for CYP3A5 who were treated with quetiapine. Inclusion criteria for the analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters, such as serum concentrations of the drug and its metabolites, included oral administration of quetiapine, availability of information on the prescribed daily dose and concomitant medications, and the determination of steady-state blood levels at the time of sampling (after at least 3 days of continuous administration at the same dose). Exclusion criteria comprised polypharmacy with known CYP3A4 inducers or inhibitors, as well as patients with hepatic or renal insufficiency. The primary endpoint was the exposure to quetiapine and N-dealkylquetiapine, measured using dose-corrected concentrations (C/D). The secondary endpoint was the metabolism of quetiapine to N-dealkylquetiapine, assessed by the ratio of metabolite to parent drug concentrations. The third endpoint is the differences in adverse reactions, QTc intervals, and biochemical parameters among patients with different CYP3A5 genotypes.

Result

Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, clinical data from 207 patients were ultimately included in the study. Of these, 20 patients had the CYP3A5*1/*1 genotype, 78 had the CYP3A5*1/*3 genotype, and 109 had the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype. The CYP3A5*3 variant was found to significantly impact the metabolism of quetiapine. The C/D values for both quetiapine and N-dealkyl quetiapine were notably higher in individuals with the *3/*3 genotype compared to those with the *1/*1 and *1/*3 genotypes (P1 < 0.001 and P2 = 0.002, respectively). A comparison of the variability in metabolic ratios among different genotype groups revealed no significant difference (P = 0.067). However, a post hoc analysis indicated that the metabolic ratio in poor metabolizers was significantly lower than that in intermediate metabolizers (P = 0.021). The analysis of adverse reaction incidence and QTc intervals among different genotypes showed no statistically significant differences (P = 0.652, P = 0.486). However, comparison of biochemical parameters across different genotype groups revealed that alanine aminotransferase, uric acid, hemoglobin, and gamma-glutamyl transferase levels were significantly higher in patients with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype compared to those with the CYP3A5*1/*1 and CYP3A5*1/*3 genotypes.

Conclusion

The results indicated that the genetic polymorphism of CYP3A5*3 significantly influences the metabolism of quetiapine. Specifically, carriers of the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype exhibited higher blood levels of quetiapine, with a greater likelihood of these levels exceeding the therapeutic range. This finding underscores the need for clinicians to pay special attention to the efficacy and occurrence of adverse reactions when prescribing quetiapine to patients carrying the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype.
CYP3A5*3 基因型对奎硫平暴露量和疗效的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:有人提出细胞色素P450 3A5(CYP3A5)参与了喹硫平的代谢,但尚无确凿证据。本研究旨在定量评估中国患者群体中 CYP3A5 基因变异对奎硫平暴露的影响:从河北医科大学第一医院精神卫生中心数据库中回顾性收集患者数据,时间跨度为 2019 年 9 月 1 日至 2023 年 7 月 1 日。研究纳入了接受喹硫平治疗的 CYP3A5 基因分型患者。药代动力学参数分析(如药物及其代谢物的血清浓度)的纳入标准包括口服喹硫平、提供处方日剂量和伴随药物的信息,以及采样时稳态血药浓度的测定(以相同剂量连续用药至少3天后)。排除标准包括使用已知CYP3A4诱导剂或抑制剂的多种药物,以及肝肾功能不全的患者。主要终点是喹硫平和N-脱烷基喹硫平的暴露量,采用剂量校正浓度(C/D)测量。次要终点是喹硫平代谢为N-脱烷基喹硫平的情况,通过代谢物与母药浓度的比值进行评估。第三个终点是不同CYP3A5基因型患者在不良反应、QTc间期和生化指标方面的差异:根据纳入和排除标准,研究最终纳入了 207 名患者的临床数据。其中,20 名患者具有 CYP3A5*1/*1 基因型,78 名患者具有 CYP3A5*1/*3 基因型,109 名患者具有 CYP3A5*3/*3 基因型。与*1/*1和*1/*3基因型的个体相比,*3/*3基因型个体的喹硫平和脱烷基喹硫平的C/D值明显更高(P1结论):结果表明,CYP3A5*3 基因多态性对奎硫平的代谢有显著影响。具体而言,CYP3A5*3/*3 基因型携带者的喹硫平血药浓度较高,且超过治疗范围的可能性更大。这一发现突出表明,临床医生需要仔细监测并有可能调整这种基因型患者的用药剂量,以避免不良反应。这一发现突出表明,临床医生在给 CYP3A5*3/*3 基因型患者开喹硫平处方时,需要特别注意疗效和不良反应的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信