Validity and reliability of the new NIMHANS intellectual disability screening instrument (NID-Screener) for children and adolescents in India

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Aaheli Roy , Gautham M. Sukumar , Rajendra Kiragasur Madegowda , Gayatri Tamuli , Banandur S. Pradeep
{"title":"Validity and reliability of the new NIMHANS intellectual disability screening instrument (NID-Screener) for children and adolescents in India","authors":"Aaheli Roy ,&nbsp;Gautham M. Sukumar ,&nbsp;Rajendra Kiragasur Madegowda ,&nbsp;Gayatri Tamuli ,&nbsp;Banandur S. Pradeep","doi":"10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>There is a gap in tools specifically designed for assessing Intellectual Disability (ID) in Indian settings. To address this, the NIMHANS intellectual disability screening instrument (NID-Screener) was developed by the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ten non experts/language and ten experts rated face and content validity of NID-Screener respectively. Content validity was measured by Content Validity Ratio, Content Validity Indices (I-CVI, S-CVI) and Modified Kappa statistics. Construct validity was calculated by performing Exploratory Factor Analysis(EFA) on responses from 275 parent(s)/guardian(s) of children and adolescents (6–17 years). Criterion Validity was tested against Brief Intellectual Disability Scale (BIDS) and Clinical Diagnosis by Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist. Kappa Statistics was used to calculate inter – method and inter-Rater Reliability. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess Internal Consistency. This study was approved by NIMHANS ethics committee.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings revealed that NID-Screener has good face and content validity (S-CVI/Average = 0.917). Criterion Validity was excellent (Kappa Value=0.862, p-value&lt;0.001) when compared with BIDS. Sensitivity and specificity were found to be 84.7 %, 89 % respectively against Clinical Diagnosis. On EFA, only one underlying factor with Eigen value &gt; 1 was identified (55.8 % of total variance). Kappa value was found to be 0.971 and 0.942 for inter- rater and inter –method reliability respectively(p-value&lt;0.001). NID-Screener has good internal consistency [Cronbach’s alpha = 0.841].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>NID-Screener is a reliable and valid tool for screening ID among children and adolescents in India, facilitating its early detection through diagnostic assessments and subsequent interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8543,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of psychiatry","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 104282"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876201824003757","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

There is a gap in tools specifically designed for assessing Intellectual Disability (ID) in Indian settings. To address this, the NIMHANS intellectual disability screening instrument (NID-Screener) was developed by the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences.

Methods

Ten non experts/language and ten experts rated face and content validity of NID-Screener respectively. Content validity was measured by Content Validity Ratio, Content Validity Indices (I-CVI, S-CVI) and Modified Kappa statistics. Construct validity was calculated by performing Exploratory Factor Analysis(EFA) on responses from 275 parent(s)/guardian(s) of children and adolescents (6–17 years). Criterion Validity was tested against Brief Intellectual Disability Scale (BIDS) and Clinical Diagnosis by Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist. Kappa Statistics was used to calculate inter – method and inter-Rater Reliability. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess Internal Consistency. This study was approved by NIMHANS ethics committee.

Results

Findings revealed that NID-Screener has good face and content validity (S-CVI/Average = 0.917). Criterion Validity was excellent (Kappa Value=0.862, p-value<0.001) when compared with BIDS. Sensitivity and specificity were found to be 84.7 %, 89 % respectively against Clinical Diagnosis. On EFA, only one underlying factor with Eigen value > 1 was identified (55.8 % of total variance). Kappa value was found to be 0.971 and 0.942 for inter- rater and inter –method reliability respectively(p-value<0.001). NID-Screener has good internal consistency [Cronbach’s alpha = 0.841].

Conclusions

NID-Screener is a reliable and valid tool for screening ID among children and adolescents in India, facilitating its early detection through diagnostic assessments and subsequent interventions.
印度儿童和青少年新的 NIMHANS 智力残疾筛查工具(NID-Screener)的有效性和可靠性。
导言:在印度,专门用于评估智力障碍(ID)的工具还很缺乏。为解决这一问题,印度国家精神卫生和神经科学研究所儿童和青少年精神病学部开发了印度国家精神卫生和神经科学研究所智力残疾筛查工具(NID-Screener):方法:10 位非专家/语言专家和 10 位专家分别对 NID-Screener 的表面效度和内容效度进行了评定。内容效度通过内容效度比、内容效度指数(I-CVI、S-CVI)和修正卡帕统计来衡量。结构效度是通过对 275 名儿童和青少年(6-17 岁)的家长/监护人的回答进行探索性因子分析(EFA)来计算的。标准效度根据简明智力障碍量表(BIDS)和儿童及青少年精神科医生的临床诊断进行测试。Kappa 统计法用于计算方法间和评分者间的可靠性。Cronbach's alpha 用于评估内部一致性。这项研究获得了 NIMHANS 伦理委员会的批准:研究结果表明,NID-Screener 具有良好的表面效度和内容效度(S-CVI/Average = 0.917)。标准效度非常好(Kappa 值=0.862,P 值为 1(占总方差的 55.8%)。评分者之间和方法之间的 Kappa 值分别为 0.971 和 0.942(p 值):NID筛查器是筛查印度儿童和青少年智障的可靠有效工具,有助于通过诊断评估和后续干预措施及早发现智障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian journal of psychiatry
Asian journal of psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
297
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Psychiatry serves as a comprehensive resource for psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, neurologists, physicians, mental health students, and policymakers. Its goal is to facilitate the exchange of research findings and clinical practices between Asia and the global community. The journal focuses on psychiatric research relevant to Asia, covering preclinical, clinical, service system, and policy development topics. It also highlights the socio-cultural diversity of the region in relation to mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信