Effect of protective taping on knee eversion angle and jump height during single-leg vertical jumps in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Yoshinori Komatsu, Hiroko Sasaki
{"title":"Effect of protective taping on knee eversion angle and jump height during single-leg vertical jumps in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.","authors":"Yoshinori Komatsu, Hiroko Sasaki","doi":"10.1589/jpts.36.745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[Purpose] Taping is often performed to prevent injury and injury recurrence. However, it is unclear how taping affects landing and jumping kinematics in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the kinematic effects caused by taping during single-leg vertical jumps in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. [Participants and Methods] Ten young patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were included. The maximum knee joint flexion angle, peak value of the vertical component of the floor reaction force, maximum knee joint eversion angle, and jumping height during a single-leg vertical jump were measured using a three-dimensional motion analyzer and compared among the following three groups: without taping, with protective taping using elastic tape, and with protective taping using non-elastic tape. [Results] There were no significant differences in the peak value of the vertical component of the floor reaction force or the maximum knee joint flexion angle among the three groups. The maximum knee joint eversion angle and jumping height were significantly lower in the elastic tape and non-elastic tape groups than in the non-taping group. [Conclusion] Anterior cruciate ligament taping does not affect the magnitude of the impact on the body and can decrease knee joint eversion. However, jumping height was lower in the two taping groups than in the no-taping group. There were no significant differences in the items studied between the two taping groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physical Therapy Science","volume":"36 11","pages":"745-749"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11527463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physical Therapy Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.36.745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

[Purpose] Taping is often performed to prevent injury and injury recurrence. However, it is unclear how taping affects landing and jumping kinematics in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the kinematic effects caused by taping during single-leg vertical jumps in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. [Participants and Methods] Ten young patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were included. The maximum knee joint flexion angle, peak value of the vertical component of the floor reaction force, maximum knee joint eversion angle, and jumping height during a single-leg vertical jump were measured using a three-dimensional motion analyzer and compared among the following three groups: without taping, with protective taping using elastic tape, and with protective taping using non-elastic tape. [Results] There were no significant differences in the peak value of the vertical component of the floor reaction force or the maximum knee joint flexion angle among the three groups. The maximum knee joint eversion angle and jumping height were significantly lower in the elastic tape and non-elastic tape groups than in the non-taping group. [Conclusion] Anterior cruciate ligament taping does not affect the magnitude of the impact on the body and can decrease knee joint eversion. However, jumping height was lower in the two taping groups than in the no-taping group. There were no significant differences in the items studied between the two taping groups.

保护性绑带对前十字韧带重建患者单腿纵跳时膝关节外翻角度和跳跃高度的影响。
[目的]绑带通常用于预防损伤和损伤复发。然而,目前还不清楚绑带如何影响前交叉韧带重建患者的着地和跳跃运动学。因此,本研究旨在确定前交叉韧带重建患者在单腿纵跳时绑带对运动学的影响。[参与者和方法] 本研究纳入了 10 名接受前交叉韧带重建术的年轻患者。使用三维运动分析仪测量单腿纵跳时膝关节的最大屈曲角、地面反作用力垂直分量的峰值、膝关节的最大外翻角和跳跃高度,并对以下三组进行比较:未绑带组、使用弹性胶带进行保护性绑带组和使用非弹性胶带进行保护性绑带组。[结果] 地面反作用力垂直分量的峰值和膝关节最大屈曲角度在三组之间没有明显差异。弹性绑带组和非弹性绑带组的膝关节最大外翻角和跳跃高度明显低于非绑带组。[结论] 前交叉韧带绑扎不会影响对身体的冲击力大小,并能减少膝关节外翻。然而,两组绑带组的跳跃高度均低于未绑带组。两个绑带组在研究项目上没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信