Inter-reader agreement of LI-RADS treatment response algorithm among three readers with different seniorities for hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional therapy.
IF 1.1 4区 医学Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Inter-reader agreement of LI-RADS treatment response algorithm among three readers with different seniorities for hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional therapy.","authors":"Yuxin Wang, Himeko Asayo, Wei Wang, Hui Xu, Dawei Yang, Lixue Xu, Siwei Yang, Zhenghan Yang","doi":"10.1177/02841851241289130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The accurate evaluation of tumor response after locoregional therapy is crucial for adjusting therapeutic strategy and guiding individualized follow-up.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the inter-reader agreement of the LR-TR algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma treated with locoregional therapy among radiologists with different seniority.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 275 treated observations on 249 MRI scans from 99 patients were retrospectively collected. Three readers of different seniorities (senior, intermediate, and junior with 10, 6, and 2 years of experience in hepatic imaging, respectively) analyzed the presence or absence of features (arterial-phase hyperenhancement and washout) and evaluated LR-TR category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were substantial inter-reader agreements for overall LR-TR categorization (kappa = 0.704), LR-TR viable (kappa = 0.715), and LR-TR non-viable (kappa = 0.737), but fair inter-reader agreement for LR-TR equivocal (kappa = 0.231) among three readers. The inter-reader agreement was substantial for arterial-phase hyperenhancement (kappa = 0.725), but moderate for washout (kappa = 0.443) among three readers. The inter-reader agreements between two readers were substantial for overall LR-TR categorization (kappa = 0.734, 0.727, 0.652), LR-TR viable (kappa = 0.719, 0.752, 0.678), and LR-TR non-viable (kappa = 0.758, 0.760, 0.694), which were at the same level as the inter-reader agreements among three readers. In addition, the inter-reader agreements between two readers were substantial for arterial-phase hyperenhancement (kappa = 0.733, 0.766, 0.678), but moderate for washout (kappa = 0.473, 0.422, 0.446), which were at the same level as the inter-reader agreements among three readers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LR-TR algorithm demonstrated overall substantial inter-reader agreement among radiologists with different seniority.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851241289130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241289130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The accurate evaluation of tumor response after locoregional therapy is crucial for adjusting therapeutic strategy and guiding individualized follow-up.
Purpose: To determine the inter-reader agreement of the LR-TR algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma treated with locoregional therapy among radiologists with different seniority.
Material and methods: A total of 275 treated observations on 249 MRI scans from 99 patients were retrospectively collected. Three readers of different seniorities (senior, intermediate, and junior with 10, 6, and 2 years of experience in hepatic imaging, respectively) analyzed the presence or absence of features (arterial-phase hyperenhancement and washout) and evaluated LR-TR category.
Results: There were substantial inter-reader agreements for overall LR-TR categorization (kappa = 0.704), LR-TR viable (kappa = 0.715), and LR-TR non-viable (kappa = 0.737), but fair inter-reader agreement for LR-TR equivocal (kappa = 0.231) among three readers. The inter-reader agreement was substantial for arterial-phase hyperenhancement (kappa = 0.725), but moderate for washout (kappa = 0.443) among three readers. The inter-reader agreements between two readers were substantial for overall LR-TR categorization (kappa = 0.734, 0.727, 0.652), LR-TR viable (kappa = 0.719, 0.752, 0.678), and LR-TR non-viable (kappa = 0.758, 0.760, 0.694), which were at the same level as the inter-reader agreements among three readers. In addition, the inter-reader agreements between two readers were substantial for arterial-phase hyperenhancement (kappa = 0.733, 0.766, 0.678), but moderate for washout (kappa = 0.473, 0.422, 0.446), which were at the same level as the inter-reader agreements among three readers.
Conclusion: LR-TR algorithm demonstrated overall substantial inter-reader agreement among radiologists with different seniority.
期刊介绍：
Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
