Observer-generated maps of diagnostic facial features enable categorization and prediction of emotion expressions

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Martin Wegrzyn , Laura Münst , Jessica König , Maximilian Dinter , Johanna Kissler
{"title":"Observer-generated maps of diagnostic facial features enable categorization and prediction of emotion expressions","authors":"Martin Wegrzyn ,&nbsp;Laura Münst ,&nbsp;Jessica König ,&nbsp;Maximilian Dinter ,&nbsp;Johanna Kissler","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>According to one prominent model, facial expressions of emotion can be categorized into depicting happiness, disgust, anger, sadness, fear and surprise. One open question is which facial features observers use to recognize the different expressions and whether the features indicated by observers can be used to predict which expression they saw.</div><div>We created fine-grained maps of diagnostic facial features by asking participants to use mouse clicks to highlight those parts of a face that they deem useful for recognizing its expression. We tested how well the resulting maps align with models of emotion expressions (based on Action Units) and how the maps relate to the accuracy with which observers recognize full or partly masked faces.</div><div>As expected, observers focused on the eyes and mouth regions in all faces. However, each expression deviated from this global pattern in a unique way, allowing to create maps of diagnostic face regions. Action Units considered most important for expressing an emotion were highlighted most often, indicating their psychological validity. The maps of facial features also allowed to correctly predict which expression a participant had seen, with above-chance accuracies for all expressions. For happiness, fear and anger, the face half which was highlighted the most was also the half whose visibility led to higher recognition accuracies.</div><div>The results suggest that diagnostic facial features are distributed in unique patterns for each expression, which observers seem to intuitively extract and use when categorizing facial displays of emotion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691824004475","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to one prominent model, facial expressions of emotion can be categorized into depicting happiness, disgust, anger, sadness, fear and surprise. One open question is which facial features observers use to recognize the different expressions and whether the features indicated by observers can be used to predict which expression they saw.
We created fine-grained maps of diagnostic facial features by asking participants to use mouse clicks to highlight those parts of a face that they deem useful for recognizing its expression. We tested how well the resulting maps align with models of emotion expressions (based on Action Units) and how the maps relate to the accuracy with which observers recognize full or partly masked faces.
As expected, observers focused on the eyes and mouth regions in all faces. However, each expression deviated from this global pattern in a unique way, allowing to create maps of diagnostic face regions. Action Units considered most important for expressing an emotion were highlighted most often, indicating their psychological validity. The maps of facial features also allowed to correctly predict which expression a participant had seen, with above-chance accuracies for all expressions. For happiness, fear and anger, the face half which was highlighted the most was also the half whose visibility led to higher recognition accuracies.
The results suggest that diagnostic facial features are distributed in unique patterns for each expression, which observers seem to intuitively extract and use when categorizing facial displays of emotion.
观察者生成的面部特征诊断图能够对情绪表达进行分类和预测。
根据一个著名的模型,面部情绪表达可分为快乐、厌恶、愤怒、悲伤、恐惧和惊讶。一个悬而未决的问题是,观察者使用哪些面部特征来识别不同的表情,以及观察者指出的特征是否可以用来预测他们看到的是哪种表情。我们创建了细粒度的面部特征诊断图,要求参与者用鼠标点击来突出面部中他们认为对识别表情有用的部分。我们测试了所绘制的图谱与情绪表达模型(基于动作单元)的吻合程度,以及图谱与观察者识别完整或部分蒙面人脸的准确性之间的关系。不出所料,观察者会将注意力集中在所有面孔的眼睛和嘴巴区域。然而,每种表情都以独特的方式偏离了这一总体模式,因此可以绘制出脸部诊断区域图。被认为对表达情绪最重要的动作单元最常被突出显示,这表明它们在心理上是有效的。面部特征图还能正确预测受试者看到的表情,所有表情的预测准确率都高于概率。对于快乐、恐惧和愤怒,被突出显示最多的那半张脸也是识别准确率较高的那半张脸。结果表明,诊断面部特征在每种表情中都有独特的分布模式,观察者在对面部情绪显示进行分类时,似乎可以直观地提取并使用这些特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信