Prediction of cytotoxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from first principles.

IF 8.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2024-12-10 Epub Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177145
Taewoo Kim, Juyuan Zhen, Junghyun Lee, Shin Yeong Park, Changkeun Lee, Bong-Oh Kwon, Seongjin Hong, Hyeong-Moo Shin, John P Giesy, Gap Soo Chang, Jong Seong Khim
{"title":"Prediction of cytotoxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from first principles.","authors":"Taewoo Kim, Juyuan Zhen, Junghyun Lee, Shin Yeong Park, Changkeun Lee, Bong-Oh Kwon, Seongjin Hong, Hyeong-Moo Shin, John P Giesy, Gap Soo Chang, Jong Seong Khim","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ligand-specific binding interactions of xenobiotics with receptor proteins form the basis of cytotoxicity-based hazard assessment. Computational approaches enable predictive hazard assessment for a large number of chemicals in a high-throughput manner, minimizing the use of animal testing. However, in silico models for predicting mechanisms of toxic actions and potencies are difficult to develop because toxicity datasets or comprehensive understanding of the complicated kinetic process of ligand-receptor interactions are needed for model development. In this study, a directional reactive binding factor (DRBF) model based on first principles was used to predict cytotoxicity potencies of agonists of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) for 16 different polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Molecular dynamics were simulated by accounting for the directional configuration factor toward receptor protein and the factor of binding to the Per-Arnt-Sim (PAS) domain. When comparing the experimental results of toxic potencies from in vitro bioassays with the predictions among two different in silico models, including quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) and molecular docking models, the DRBF model exhibited the highest model performance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.90 and p < 0.01). Our results showed that the DRBF model based on first principles and molecular and computational structural biology could serve as a novel framework to advance next generation hazard assessment for high-throughput screening of chemical substances.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":" ","pages":"177145"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177145","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ligand-specific binding interactions of xenobiotics with receptor proteins form the basis of cytotoxicity-based hazard assessment. Computational approaches enable predictive hazard assessment for a large number of chemicals in a high-throughput manner, minimizing the use of animal testing. However, in silico models for predicting mechanisms of toxic actions and potencies are difficult to develop because toxicity datasets or comprehensive understanding of the complicated kinetic process of ligand-receptor interactions are needed for model development. In this study, a directional reactive binding factor (DRBF) model based on first principles was used to predict cytotoxicity potencies of agonists of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) for 16 different polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Molecular dynamics were simulated by accounting for the directional configuration factor toward receptor protein and the factor of binding to the Per-Arnt-Sim (PAS) domain. When comparing the experimental results of toxic potencies from in vitro bioassays with the predictions among two different in silico models, including quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) and molecular docking models, the DRBF model exhibited the highest model performance (R2 = 0.90 and p < 0.01). Our results showed that the DRBF model based on first principles and molecular and computational structural biology could serve as a novel framework to advance next generation hazard assessment for high-throughput screening of chemical substances.

根据第一原理预测多环芳烃的细胞毒性。
异种生物与受体蛋白的配体特异性结合相互作用是基于细胞毒性的危害评估的基础。计算方法能以高通量的方式对大量化学品进行预测性危害评估,从而最大限度地减少动物试验的使用。然而,由于开发模型需要毒性数据集或对配体-受体相互作用的复杂动力学过程有全面的了解,因此很难开发用于预测毒性作用机制和效力的硅学模型。本研究采用基于第一原理的定向反应结合因子(DRBF)模型预测芳基烃受体(AhR)激动剂对 16 种不同多环芳烃(PAHs)的细胞毒性效力。分子动力学模拟考虑了对受体蛋白的定向配置因子和与 Per-Arnt-Sim (PAS) 结构域结合的因子。将体外生物测定的毒力实验结果与两种不同的硅学模型(包括定量结构-活性关系模型和分子对接模型)的预测结果进行比较时,DRBF 模型表现出最高的模型性能(R2 = 0.90,p = 0.9)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信