Evaluation of the Rostral Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block via the Mental Foramen in Equids: In Vivo Efficacy Testing.

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Ashton Broman, Jennifer E Rawlinson, Luke Bass, Pedro Boscan, Sangeeta Rao
{"title":"Evaluation of the Rostral Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block via the Mental Foramen in Equids: In Vivo Efficacy Testing.","authors":"Ashton Broman, Jennifer E Rawlinson, Luke Bass, Pedro Boscan, Sangeeta Rao","doi":"10.1177/08987564241295586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of proper sedative and regional anesthetic protocols is essential when performing equine dental surgical procedures under standing sedation. The efficacy of the rostral inferior alveolar nerve block via the mental foramen has not been previously studied. Aims of this study included determining the efficacy of the block, investigating whether any region (labial mucosa, alveolar mucosa, or teeth) was more reliably anesthetized, and if differences in efficacy existed between bilateral and unilateral blocks. In this blinded trial, 10 horses each were randomly assigned to receive a left unilateral block, right unilateral block or bilateral blocks and 5 horses were bilateral controls. For unilateral groups, the contralateral side of the horse acted as its own unilateral control. Mechanical nociceptive stimulus methods were used to determine response to stimulus at time points pre-sedation, post-sedation, and post-injection at 10, 30, 60, and 90 min. Results were evaluated in 4 groups: unilateral blocks, unilateral controls, bilateral blocks and bilateral controls. Overall, all groups were significantly less likely to respond to stimulus at time points post-sedation, T10, and T30, whereas only blocked sites were less likely to respond at T60 and T90 compared to pre-sedation. There was no significant difference in response to stimuli of blocked sites between the 3 regions at all time points. Overall, at T60 and T90, blocks produced regional anesthesia in 73% and 55% of sites, respectively. This study demonstrated the equine mental foramen regional nerve block has varied efficacy, producing partial or incomplete regional anesthesia in some cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":17584,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"8987564241295586"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08987564241295586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of proper sedative and regional anesthetic protocols is essential when performing equine dental surgical procedures under standing sedation. The efficacy of the rostral inferior alveolar nerve block via the mental foramen has not been previously studied. Aims of this study included determining the efficacy of the block, investigating whether any region (labial mucosa, alveolar mucosa, or teeth) was more reliably anesthetized, and if differences in efficacy existed between bilateral and unilateral blocks. In this blinded trial, 10 horses each were randomly assigned to receive a left unilateral block, right unilateral block or bilateral blocks and 5 horses were bilateral controls. For unilateral groups, the contralateral side of the horse acted as its own unilateral control. Mechanical nociceptive stimulus methods were used to determine response to stimulus at time points pre-sedation, post-sedation, and post-injection at 10, 30, 60, and 90 min. Results were evaluated in 4 groups: unilateral blocks, unilateral controls, bilateral blocks and bilateral controls. Overall, all groups were significantly less likely to respond to stimulus at time points post-sedation, T10, and T30, whereas only blocked sites were less likely to respond at T60 and T90 compared to pre-sedation. There was no significant difference in response to stimuli of blocked sites between the 3 regions at all time points. Overall, at T60 and T90, blocks produced regional anesthesia in 73% and 55% of sites, respectively. This study demonstrated the equine mental foramen regional nerve block has varied efficacy, producing partial or incomplete regional anesthesia in some cases.

评估经齿孔阻滞马齿槽下神经:体内疗效测试。
在站立镇静状态下进行马牙科手术时,使用适当的镇静剂和区域麻醉方案至关重要。此前尚未研究过通过精神孔进行喙下牙槽神经阻滞的效果。本研究的目的包括确定阻滞的疗效,调查是否任何区域(唇粘膜、牙槽粘膜或牙齿)的麻醉效果更可靠,以及双侧和单侧阻滞的疗效是否存在差异。在这项盲法试验中,10 匹马被随机分配接受左侧单侧阻滞、右侧单侧阻滞或双侧阻滞,5 匹马为双侧对照组。对于单侧组,马的对侧作为自己的单侧对照组。采用机械痛觉刺激方法来确定马匹在镇静前、镇静后和注射后 10、30、60 和 90 分钟的时间点对刺激的反应。结果按 4 组进行评估:单侧阻滞组、单侧对照组、双侧阻滞组和双侧对照组。总体而言,所有组别在镇静后、T10 和 T30 时间点对刺激做出反应的可能性都明显较低,而与镇静前相比,只有阻滞部位在 T60 和 T90 时间点做出反应的可能性较低。在所有时间点上,3 个区域的受阻部位对刺激的反应均无明显差异。总体而言,在 T60 和 T90 时,分别有 73% 和 55% 的阻滞部位产生了区域麻醉。这项研究表明,马精神孔区域神经阻滞的疗效各不相同,在某些情况下会产生部分或不完全的区域麻醉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Veterinary Dentistry
Journal of Veterinary Dentistry VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Dentistry (JOVD) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the Foundation for Veterinary Dentistry. The JOVD provides a continuing education forum for veterinary dental scientists, veterinarians, dentists, and veterinary/dental technicians and hygienists who are engaged in veterinary dental practice. JOVD articles provide practical and scientifically sound information covering not only the medical and surgical aspects, but also specific categories as they relate to clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信