Comparative Analysis of Compact Modeled of Low-Voltage OTFTs on Flexible and Silicon Substrates for the Implementation of Logic Circuits

Mukuljeet Singh Mehrolia;Ankit Verma;Abhishek Kumar Singh
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Compact Modeled of Low-Voltage OTFTs on Flexible and Silicon Substrates for the Implementation of Logic Circuits","authors":"Mukuljeet Singh Mehrolia;Ankit Verma;Abhishek Kumar Singh","doi":"10.1109/JFLEX.2024.3471489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the compact modeling of organic thin-film transistors (OTFTs) fabricated on both flexible and silicon substrates. These compact models are used to implement inverters, 2-input NAND gate, and half-adder circuits. For the compact modeling and circuit design, Silvaco TechModeler and Silvaco Gateway tools are utilized. Both the flexible and silicon substrate OTFTs operate at −2 V, with saturated currents of −2 and \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$- 3.9~\\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\nA, respectively. Comparative analysis using dc and transient behavior reveals that the OTFT on the flexible substrate has a delay of 3.7 ns and a gain of 4.7, while the OTFT on the silicon substrate has a delay of 5.5 ns and a gain of 3.2. The OTFT on the flexible substrate is approximately 49% faster and exhibits a gain 1.47 times higher than the OTFT on the silicon substrate. Furthermore, the OTFT on the flexible substrate successfully realizes half-adder outputs for all four input cases (00, 01, 10, and 11), whereas the OTFT on the silicon substrate fails to do so for all cases. These results demonstrate that the OTFT on the flexible substrate significantly outperforms the OTFT on the silicon substrate in terms of delay, gain, and output consistency for the given inputs. In the future, the OTFT on the flexible substrate’s quick response, high gain, and reliable performance in NAND and half-adder circuits could offer advantages in the development of complex memory circuits, analog circuits, and other applications.","PeriodicalId":100623,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal on Flexible Electronics","volume":"3 7","pages":"341-347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal on Flexible Electronics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10701505/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses the compact modeling of organic thin-film transistors (OTFTs) fabricated on both flexible and silicon substrates. These compact models are used to implement inverters, 2-input NAND gate, and half-adder circuits. For the compact modeling and circuit design, Silvaco TechModeler and Silvaco Gateway tools are utilized. Both the flexible and silicon substrate OTFTs operate at −2 V, with saturated currents of −2 and $- 3.9~\mu $ A, respectively. Comparative analysis using dc and transient behavior reveals that the OTFT on the flexible substrate has a delay of 3.7 ns and a gain of 4.7, while the OTFT on the silicon substrate has a delay of 5.5 ns and a gain of 3.2. The OTFT on the flexible substrate is approximately 49% faster and exhibits a gain 1.47 times higher than the OTFT on the silicon substrate. Furthermore, the OTFT on the flexible substrate successfully realizes half-adder outputs for all four input cases (00, 01, 10, and 11), whereas the OTFT on the silicon substrate fails to do so for all cases. These results demonstrate that the OTFT on the flexible substrate significantly outperforms the OTFT on the silicon substrate in terms of delay, gain, and output consistency for the given inputs. In the future, the OTFT on the flexible substrate’s quick response, high gain, and reliable performance in NAND and half-adder circuits could offer advantages in the development of complex memory circuits, analog circuits, and other applications.
用于实现逻辑电路的柔性和硅基底低压 OTFT 紧凑型模型比较分析
本文讨论了在柔性基板和硅基板上制造的有机薄膜晶体管 (OTFT) 的紧凑建模。这些紧凑型模型用于实现反相器、2 输入 NAND 栅极和半梯形电路。在紧凑建模和电路设计中,使用了 Silvaco TechModeler 和 Silvaco Gateway 工具。柔性衬底和硅衬底 OTFT 的工作电压均为-2 V,饱和电流分别为-2 A 和 $- 3.9~mu $ A。使用直流和瞬态行为进行的比较分析表明,柔性衬底上的 OTFT 具有 3.7 ns 的延迟和 4.7 的增益,而硅衬底上的 OTFT 具有 5.5 ns 的延迟和 3.2 的增益。柔性衬底上的 OTFT 比硅衬底上的 OTFT 快约 49%,增益高 1.47 倍。此外,柔性衬底上的 OTFT 在所有四种输入情况(00、01、10 和 11)下都成功实现了半阶梯输出,而硅衬底上的 OTFT 在所有情况下都未能实现半阶梯输出。这些结果表明,对于给定输入,柔性基板上的 OTFT 在延迟、增益和输出一致性方面明显优于硅基板上的 OTFT。未来,柔性基板上的 OTFT 在 NAND 和半梯形电路中的快速响应、高增益和可靠性能将为复杂存储电路、模拟电路和其他应用的开发提供优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信