Active Inference Models of AV Takeovers: Relating Model Parameters to Trust, Situation Awareness, and Fatigue.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Ran Wei, Anthony D McDonald, Ranjana K Mehta, Alfredo Garcia
{"title":"Active Inference Models of AV Takeovers: Relating Model Parameters to Trust, Situation Awareness, and Fatigue.","authors":"Ran Wei, Anthony D McDonald, Ranjana K Mehta, Alfredo Garcia","doi":"10.1177/00187208241295932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objectives were to assess the efficacy of active inference models for capturing driver takeovers from automated vehicles and to evaluate the links between model parameters and self-reported cognitive fatigue, trust, and situation awareness.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Control transitions between human drivers and automation pose a substantial safety and performance risk. Models of driver behavior that predict these transitions from data are a critical tool for designing safer, human-centered, systems but current models do not sufficiently account for human factors. Active inference theory is a promising approach to integrate human factors because of its grounding in cognition and translation to a quantitative modeling framework.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used data from a driving simulation to develop an active inference model of takeover performance. After validating the model's predictions, we used Bayesian regression with a spike and slab prior to assess substantial correlations between model parameters and self-reported trust, situation awareness, fatigue, and demographic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model accurately captured driving takeover times. The regression results showed that increases in cognitive fatigue were associated with increased uncertainty about the need to takeover, attributable to mapping observations to environmental states. Higher situation awareness was correlated with a more precise understanding of the environment and state transitions. Higher trust was associated with increased variance in environmental conditions associated with environmental states.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results align with prior theory on trust and active inference and provide a critical connection between complex driver states and interpretable model parameters.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>The active inference framework can be used in the testing and validation of automated vehicle technology to calibrate design parameters to ensure safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208241295932","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Our objectives were to assess the efficacy of active inference models for capturing driver takeovers from automated vehicles and to evaluate the links between model parameters and self-reported cognitive fatigue, trust, and situation awareness.

Background: Control transitions between human drivers and automation pose a substantial safety and performance risk. Models of driver behavior that predict these transitions from data are a critical tool for designing safer, human-centered, systems but current models do not sufficiently account for human factors. Active inference theory is a promising approach to integrate human factors because of its grounding in cognition and translation to a quantitative modeling framework.

Method: We used data from a driving simulation to develop an active inference model of takeover performance. After validating the model's predictions, we used Bayesian regression with a spike and slab prior to assess substantial correlations between model parameters and self-reported trust, situation awareness, fatigue, and demographic factors.

Results: The model accurately captured driving takeover times. The regression results showed that increases in cognitive fatigue were associated with increased uncertainty about the need to takeover, attributable to mapping observations to environmental states. Higher situation awareness was correlated with a more precise understanding of the environment and state transitions. Higher trust was associated with increased variance in environmental conditions associated with environmental states.

Conclusion: The results align with prior theory on trust and active inference and provide a critical connection between complex driver states and interpretable model parameters.

Application: The active inference framework can be used in the testing and validation of automated vehicle technology to calibrate design parameters to ensure safety.

自动驾驶汽车接管的主动推理模型:将模型参数与信任、情境意识和疲劳相关联。
目标:我们的目标是评估主动推理模型在捕捉自动驾驶车辆的驾驶员接管方面的功效,并评估模型参数与自我报告的认知疲劳、信任和情况意识之间的联系:背景:人类驾驶员与自动驾驶车辆之间的控制转换会带来巨大的安全和性能风险。根据数据预测这些转换的驾驶员行为模型是设计更安全、以人为本的系统的重要工具,但目前的模型没有充分考虑人为因素。主动推理理论以认知为基础,并可转化为定量建模框架,因此是一种很有前景的整合人为因素的方法:方法:我们利用驾驶模拟数据建立了一个主动推理接管性能模型。在对模型的预测进行验证后,我们使用贝叶斯回归法与尖峰和板块先验法来评估模型参数与自我报告的信任、情况意识、疲劳和人口因素之间的实质性相关性:结果:模型准确地捕捉到了驾驶接管时间。回归结果表明,认知疲劳的增加与接管需求不确定性的增加有关,这可归因于将观察结果映射到环境状态。较高的情境意识与对环境和状态转换的更精确理解相关。信任度越高,与环境状态相关的环境条件差异越大:结论:研究结果与之前关于信任和主动推理的理论相一致,并在复杂的驱动力状态和可解释的模型参数之间提供了重要的联系:主动推理框架可用于自动驾驶汽车技术的测试和验证,以校准设计参数,确保安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信