3D Bioprinting a Novel Skin Co-Culture Model Using Human Keratinocytes and Fibroblasts.

Thiago A M Andrade, Victor Allisson da Silva, Kali Scheck, Tania Garay, Ruchi Sharma, Stephanie M Willerth
{"title":"3D Bioprinting a Novel Skin Co-Culture Model Using Human Keratinocytes and Fibroblasts.","authors":"Thiago A M Andrade, Victor Allisson da Silva, Kali Scheck, Tania Garay, Ruchi Sharma, Stephanie M Willerth","doi":"10.1002/jbm.a.37831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>3D bioprinting can generate the organized structures found in human skin for a variety of biological, medical, and pharmaceutical applications. Challenges in bioprinting skin include printing different types of cells in the same construct while maintaining their viability, which depends on the type of bioprinter and bioinks used. This study evaluated a novel 3D bioprinted skin model containing human keratinocytes (HEKa) and human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) in co-culture (CC) using a high-viscosity fibrin-based bioink produced using the BioX extrusion-based bioprinter. The constructs containing HEKa or HDF cells alone (control groups) and in CC were evaluated at 1, 10, and 20 days after bioprinting for viability, immunocytochemistry for specific markers (K5 and K10 for keratinocytes; vimentin and fibroblast specific protein [FSP] for fibroblasts). The storage, loss modulus, and viscosity properties of the constructs were also assessed to compare the effects of keratinocytes and fibroblasts individually and combined, providing important insights when bioprinting skin. Our findings revealed significantly higher cell viability in the CC group compared to individual keratinocyte and fibroblast groups, suggesting the combined cell presence enhanced survival rates. Additionally, proliferation rates of both cell types remained consistent over time, indicating non-competitive growth within the construct. Interestingly, keratinocytes exhibited a greater impact on the viscoelastic properties of the construct compared to fibroblasts, likely due to their larger size and arrangement. These insights contribute to optimizing bioprinting strategies for skin tissue engineering and emphasize the important role of different cell types in 3D skin models.</p>","PeriodicalId":94066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

3D bioprinting can generate the organized structures found in human skin for a variety of biological, medical, and pharmaceutical applications. Challenges in bioprinting skin include printing different types of cells in the same construct while maintaining their viability, which depends on the type of bioprinter and bioinks used. This study evaluated a novel 3D bioprinted skin model containing human keratinocytes (HEKa) and human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) in co-culture (CC) using a high-viscosity fibrin-based bioink produced using the BioX extrusion-based bioprinter. The constructs containing HEKa or HDF cells alone (control groups) and in CC were evaluated at 1, 10, and 20 days after bioprinting for viability, immunocytochemistry for specific markers (K5 and K10 for keratinocytes; vimentin and fibroblast specific protein [FSP] for fibroblasts). The storage, loss modulus, and viscosity properties of the constructs were also assessed to compare the effects of keratinocytes and fibroblasts individually and combined, providing important insights when bioprinting skin. Our findings revealed significantly higher cell viability in the CC group compared to individual keratinocyte and fibroblast groups, suggesting the combined cell presence enhanced survival rates. Additionally, proliferation rates of both cell types remained consistent over time, indicating non-competitive growth within the construct. Interestingly, keratinocytes exhibited a greater impact on the viscoelastic properties of the construct compared to fibroblasts, likely due to their larger size and arrangement. These insights contribute to optimizing bioprinting strategies for skin tissue engineering and emphasize the important role of different cell types in 3D skin models.

利用人体角质形成细胞和成纤维细胞的三维生物打印新型皮肤共培养模型
三维生物打印可生成人类皮肤中的有序结构,用于各种生物、医疗和制药应用。皮肤生物打印面临的挑战包括在同一结构中打印不同类型的细胞,同时保持它们的活力,这取决于所使用的生物打印机和生物墨水的类型。本研究评估了一种新型三维生物打印皮肤模型,该模型含有人角质形成细胞(HEKa)和人真皮成纤维细胞(HDF),并使用 BioX 挤压式生物打印机生产的高粘度纤维蛋白基生物墨水进行共培养(CC)。在生物打印后的 1、10 和 20 天,分别对单独含有 HEKa 或 HDF 细胞(对照组)和 CC 中的构建体进行了存活率和特定标记免疫细胞化学评估(角质形成细胞为 K5 和 K10;成纤维细胞为波形蛋白和成纤维细胞特异性蛋白 [FSP])。我们还评估了构建物的储存、损失模量和粘度特性,以比较角质形成细胞和成纤维细胞单独或联合作用的效果,这为皮肤生物打印提供了重要依据。我们的研究结果表明,与单独的角质形成细胞和成纤维细胞组相比,CC 组的细胞存活率明显更高,这表明细胞的联合存在提高了存活率。此外,随着时间的推移,两种细胞类型的增殖率保持一致,这表明构建体中的细胞生长不存在竞争。有趣的是,与成纤维细胞相比,角质形成细胞对构建体粘弹性的影响更大,这可能是由于它们的体积和排列方式更大。这些见解有助于优化皮肤组织工程的生物打印策略,并强调了不同细胞类型在三维皮肤模型中的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信