Egill Magnússon, Kathryn Crowe, Harpa Stefánsdóttir, Mark Guiberson, Thora Másdóttir, Inga Ágústsdóttir, Ösp Vilberg Baldursdóttir
{"title":"Representation of the ICF in research of speech intelligibility: A systematic review of literature describing deaf and hard-of-hearing children.","authors":"Egill Magnússon, Kathryn Crowe, Harpa Stefánsdóttir, Mark Guiberson, Thora Másdóttir, Inga Ágústsdóttir, Ösp Vilberg Baldursdóttir","doi":"10.1080/17549507.2024.2409131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this review was to map speech intelligibility measures used for assessing d/Deaf and hard-of-hearing children onto the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This review considered perceptual speech intelligibility measures (Articulation functions b320) used to assess deaf and hard-of-hearing children aged 12 years and younger. The following electronic databases were searched: CINAHL; ERIC (ProQuest); Linguistic, Language, and Behaviour Abstracts; Scopus; Medline via PubMed; CENTRAL via Ovid; Cochrane via Ovid; and Joanna Briggs via Ovid. Data were extracted describing the article, participant, listener, study, speech intelligibility, and psychometric characteristics from the 245 included studies.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Speech intelligibility was measured as articulation functions (b320) through speaking (d330) in all studies. Other Body Functions frequently measured were speech discrimination (b2304; 28%) and mental functions of language (b167; 27%). Activities and Participation factors other than speaking d330 were generally not considered. Speech intelligibility was most often measured in the context of health services (e5800; 66%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Previous research on the speech intelligibility of deaf and hard-of-hearing children has largely lacked a broader perspective of functioning. Clinicians and educators of deaf and hard-of-hearing children should consider Activities and Participation, Environmental, and Personal Factors when assessing speech intelligibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":49047,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2024.2409131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this review was to map speech intelligibility measures used for assessing d/Deaf and hard-of-hearing children onto the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
Method: This review considered perceptual speech intelligibility measures (Articulation functions b320) used to assess deaf and hard-of-hearing children aged 12 years and younger. The following electronic databases were searched: CINAHL; ERIC (ProQuest); Linguistic, Language, and Behaviour Abstracts; Scopus; Medline via PubMed; CENTRAL via Ovid; Cochrane via Ovid; and Joanna Briggs via Ovid. Data were extracted describing the article, participant, listener, study, speech intelligibility, and psychometric characteristics from the 245 included studies.
Result: Speech intelligibility was measured as articulation functions (b320) through speaking (d330) in all studies. Other Body Functions frequently measured were speech discrimination (b2304; 28%) and mental functions of language (b167; 27%). Activities and Participation factors other than speaking d330 were generally not considered. Speech intelligibility was most often measured in the context of health services (e5800; 66%).
Conclusion: Previous research on the speech intelligibility of deaf and hard-of-hearing children has largely lacked a broader perspective of functioning. Clinicians and educators of deaf and hard-of-hearing children should consider Activities and Participation, Environmental, and Personal Factors when assessing speech intelligibility.
目的:本综述旨在将用于评估聋儿和重听儿童的语言清晰度测量方法与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》进行对照:本综述考虑了用于评估 12 岁及以下聋儿和重听儿童的感知语言清晰度测量方法(衔接功能 b320)。检索了以下电子数据库:CINAHL;ERIC (ProQuest);Linguistic, Language, and Behaviour Abstracts;Scopus;Medline via PubMed;CENTRAL via Ovid;Cochrane via Ovid;Joanna Briggs via Ovid。从纳入的 245 项研究中提取了有关文章、参与者、听者、研究、语言清晰度和心理测量特征的数据:结果:在所有研究中,语音清晰度都是通过发音功能(b320)和说话(d330)来测量的。经常测量的其他身体功能包括语言辨别能力(b2304;28%)和语言心理功能(b167;27%)。除说话(d330)以外的活动和参与因素一般不在考虑之列。语言理解能力最常在医疗服务的背景下进行测量(e5800;66%):结论:以往关于聋儿和重听儿童语言理解能力的研究在很大程度上缺乏更广泛的功能视角。聋儿和重听儿童的临床医生和教育工作者在评估言语理解能力时应考虑活动和参与、环境和个人因素。
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is an international journal which promotes discussion on a broad range of current clinical and theoretical issues. Submissions may include experimental, review and theoretical discussion papers, with studies from either quantitative and/or qualitative frameworks. Articles may relate to any area of child or adult communication or dysphagia, furthering knowledge on issues related to etiology, assessment, diagnosis, intervention, or theoretical frameworks. Articles can be accompanied by supplementary audio and video files that will be uploaded to the journal’s website. Special issues on contemporary topics are published at least once a year. A scientific forum is included in many issues, where a topic is debated by invited international experts.