Proactive total diet replacement referral for type 2 diabetes: A service evaluation.

Stephen Wormall, Karen Richardson
{"title":"Proactive total diet replacement referral for type 2 diabetes: A service evaluation.","authors":"Stephen Wormall, Karen Richardson","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus morbidity disproportionally effects the most socioeconomically deprived 20 % of England. Total Diet Replacement (TDR) is a high impact intervention currently commissioned by Integrated Care Boards (ICB). Finding and referring eligible, motivated patients is a significant challenge. This study evaluates a 12-month population health management, proactive referral intervention commissioned by Nottingham and Nottinghamshire ICB during a 2-year TDR pilot designed to supplement referrals from primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Diabetes specialist nurse clinically reviewed a list of potentially eligible patients found by searching routinely collected health care data from 16 primary care centres in 3 PCNs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>19.7 % (50/254) of potential patients were referred during the intervention period. 19.3 % (49/254) were uncontactable. 39.8 % (101/254) declined referral. 17.7 % (45/254) were ineligible after clinical review. An interrupted time series analysis suggests monthly referrals increased during the study period due to the intervetion (F (1,22) = 5.19 p=0.0345). Searching for patients from more socioeconomically deprived areas (index of multiple deprivation deciles 1-3) did not meaningfully alter the referral yield (19.6 %, 19/97).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proactive care interventions could be used to facilitate referrals to the TDR or other high impact interventions by healthcare commissioning bodies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94177,"journal":{"name":"Primary care diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary care diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2024.10.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus morbidity disproportionally effects the most socioeconomically deprived 20 % of England. Total Diet Replacement (TDR) is a high impact intervention currently commissioned by Integrated Care Boards (ICB). Finding and referring eligible, motivated patients is a significant challenge. This study evaluates a 12-month population health management, proactive referral intervention commissioned by Nottingham and Nottinghamshire ICB during a 2-year TDR pilot designed to supplement referrals from primary care.

Methods: A Diabetes specialist nurse clinically reviewed a list of potentially eligible patients found by searching routinely collected health care data from 16 primary care centres in 3 PCNs.

Results: 19.7 % (50/254) of potential patients were referred during the intervention period. 19.3 % (49/254) were uncontactable. 39.8 % (101/254) declined referral. 17.7 % (45/254) were ineligible after clinical review. An interrupted time series analysis suggests monthly referrals increased during the study period due to the intervetion (F (1,22) = 5.19 p=0.0345). Searching for patients from more socioeconomically deprived areas (index of multiple deprivation deciles 1-3) did not meaningfully alter the referral yield (19.6 %, 19/97).

Conclusions: Proactive care interventions could be used to facilitate referrals to the TDR or other high impact interventions by healthcare commissioning bodies.

2 型糖尿病患者的主动全饮食替代转诊:服务评估。
目的:2 型糖尿病的发病率对英格兰社会经济最贫困的 20% 人口的影响尤为严重。全饮食替换(TDR)是目前由综合护理委员会(ICB)委托进行的一项高效干预措施。寻找和转诊符合条件、有积极性的患者是一项重大挑战。本研究评估了诺丁汉和诺丁汉郡综合医疗委员会在为期 2 年的全饮食替代试点期间委托开展的一项为期 12 个月的人口健康管理、主动转诊干预措施,该措施旨在补充来自初级保健的转诊:方法:一名糖尿病专科护士通过搜索 3 个 PCN 中 16 个初级保健中心的常规保健数据,对可能符合条件的患者名单进行临床审查:在干预期间,19.7%(50/254)的潜在患者被转诊。19.3%(49/254)的患者无法联系。39.8%的患者(101/254)拒绝转诊。17.7%(45/254)经临床审查不符合条件。间断时间序列分析表明,在研究期间,每月转诊人数因间断时间序列而增加(F (1,22) = 5.19 p=0.0345)。对来自社会经济较贫困地区(多重贫困指数1-3分位)的患者进行搜索并未显著改变转诊率(19.6%,19/97):结论:积极的护理干预措施可用于促进转诊至TDR或医疗委托机构的其他高效干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信