Improving the assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction by including left atrial strain in the algorithm: LA Strain and LV diastolic dysfunction assessment.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Lin Wang, Jonathan Weber, Jason Craft, Michael Passick, Omar K Khalique, Ziad A Ali, Jae K Oh, J Jane Cao
{"title":"Improving the assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction by including left atrial strain in the algorithm: LA Strain and LV diastolic dysfunction assessment.","authors":"Lin Wang, Jonathan Weber, Jason Craft, Michael Passick, Omar K Khalique, Ziad A Ali, Jae K Oh, J Jane Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.08.064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The latest guidelines on echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) leave a significant proportion of patients with LVDD status undetermined. We aimed to examine the implication of an alternative algorithm incorporating left atrial (LA) strain as a tiebreaker on the indeterminate LVDD category.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We included 823 patients who underwent echocardiography and cardiac MRI within 7 days. LVDD was assessed by echocardiography following contemporary guidelines and an alternative algorithm including LA reservoir strain as a tie-breaker. LVDD was examined for its association with LV myocardial scar burden by cardiac MRI, and a composite outcome. 275 (33%) patients had LVDD, of whom 119 had advanced grades of LVDD (grade II-III), and 117 (14%) had indeterminate LVDD grade. When LA strain was applied at cut points of 18%, 24% and 35%, subjects were reclassified as normal or LVDD dependent accordingly. Reclassification allowed a similar outcome risk-stratification as the current guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LA reservoir strain improved LVDD assessment by eliminating indeterminate status/grade while maintaining the same effective outcome stratification as current guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.08.064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The latest guidelines on echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) leave a significant proportion of patients with LVDD status undetermined. We aimed to examine the implication of an alternative algorithm incorporating left atrial (LA) strain as a tiebreaker on the indeterminate LVDD category.

Methods and results: We included 823 patients who underwent echocardiography and cardiac MRI within 7 days. LVDD was assessed by echocardiography following contemporary guidelines and an alternative algorithm including LA reservoir strain as a tie-breaker. LVDD was examined for its association with LV myocardial scar burden by cardiac MRI, and a composite outcome. 275 (33%) patients had LVDD, of whom 119 had advanced grades of LVDD (grade II-III), and 117 (14%) had indeterminate LVDD grade. When LA strain was applied at cut points of 18%, 24% and 35%, subjects were reclassified as normal or LVDD dependent accordingly. Reclassification allowed a similar outcome risk-stratification as the current guidelines.

Conclusions: LA reservoir strain improved LVDD assessment by eliminating indeterminate status/grade while maintaining the same effective outcome stratification as current guidelines.

将左心房应变纳入算法,改进左心室舒张功能障碍的评估:LA 应变和左心室舒张功能障碍评估。
背景:最新的左心室舒张功能障碍(LVDD)超声心动图评估指南使相当一部分患者的 LVDD 状态未确定。我们旨在研究将左心房(LA)应变作为不确定 LVDD 类别的决定因素的替代算法的影响:我们纳入了 823 名在 7 天内接受超声心动图和心脏磁共振成像检查的患者。超声心动图评估 LVDD 时遵循了当代指南和一种替代算法,其中包括将 LA 储层应变作为平局判定标准。通过心脏磁共振成像检查 LVDD 与左心室心肌瘢痕负担的关系,并得出综合结果。275例(33%)患者患有LVDD,其中119例为晚期LVDD(II-III级),117例(14%)LVDD等级不确定。当 LA 应变的切点为 18%、24% 和 35% 时,受试者会相应地被重新分类为正常或依赖 LVDD。重新分类后的结果风险分级与现行指南相似:结论:LA 储库应变通过消除不确定状态/等级,改善了 LVDD 评估,同时保持了与现行指南相同的有效结果分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信