Effects of different endovascular treatments on cerebral perfusion changes and stroke recurrence in patients with intracranial atherosclerosis.

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Jiayin Zhang, Zhe Wang, Zhikai Hou, Ying Yu, Jiabao Yang, Weilun Fu, Ning Ma, Long Yan
{"title":"Effects of different endovascular treatments on cerebral perfusion changes and stroke recurrence in patients with intracranial atherosclerosis.","authors":"Jiayin Zhang, Zhe Wang, Zhikai Hou, Ying Yu, Jiabao Yang, Weilun Fu, Ning Ma, Long Yan","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients with refractory intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD), percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTBA) is less complex but typically results in higher postprocedural residual stenosis than percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with stenting (PTAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients with symptomatic ICAD with 70-99% stenosis treated with either PTBA or PTAS. All patients underwent preprocedural and postprocedural CT perfusion, which was processed by automated RAPID software. The rate of cerebral perfusion change was defined as the ratio of the volume of perfusion change to the preprocedural perfusion volume. Perioperative complications within a 30-day follow-up period were documented. Baseline characteristics, degree of stenosis before and after procedures, perioperative complications, and the rates of cerebral perfusion change were compared between groups. Patients were followed up for stroke recurrence within 1 year postprocedure, with survival analysis used to examine the relationship between procedure type and recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between March and December 2021, 107 patients were enrolled: 30 (28.0%) were treated with PTBA and 77 (72.0%) with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with stenting (PTAS). The PTBA group showed higher postprocedural residual stenosis than the PTAS group (P<0.004). The cerebral perfusion change rates were not significantly different between the groups (P=0.891). Three (3.9%) complications occurred in the PTAS group and none in the PTBA group during the 30-day follow-up. Stroke recurrence did not significantly differ between the procedures (P=0.960).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Immediate cerebral perfusion changes and the rate of stroke recurrences have no significant difference between the two groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022365","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In patients with refractory intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD), percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTBA) is less complex but typically results in higher postprocedural residual stenosis than percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with stenting (PTAS).

Methods: This study included patients with symptomatic ICAD with 70-99% stenosis treated with either PTBA or PTAS. All patients underwent preprocedural and postprocedural CT perfusion, which was processed by automated RAPID software. The rate of cerebral perfusion change was defined as the ratio of the volume of perfusion change to the preprocedural perfusion volume. Perioperative complications within a 30-day follow-up period were documented. Baseline characteristics, degree of stenosis before and after procedures, perioperative complications, and the rates of cerebral perfusion change were compared between groups. Patients were followed up for stroke recurrence within 1 year postprocedure, with survival analysis used to examine the relationship between procedure type and recurrence.

Results: Between March and December 2021, 107 patients were enrolled: 30 (28.0%) were treated with PTBA and 77 (72.0%) with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with stenting (PTAS). The PTBA group showed higher postprocedural residual stenosis than the PTAS group (P<0.004). The cerebral perfusion change rates were not significantly different between the groups (P=0.891). Three (3.9%) complications occurred in the PTAS group and none in the PTBA group during the 30-day follow-up. Stroke recurrence did not significantly differ between the procedures (P=0.960).

Conclusions: Immediate cerebral perfusion changes and the rate of stroke recurrences have no significant difference between the two groups.

不同血管内治疗对颅内动脉粥样硬化患者脑灌注变化和中风复发的影响。
背景:对于难治性颅内动脉粥样硬化疾病(ICAD)患者,经皮腔内球囊血管成形术(PTBA)的复杂性较低,但与经皮腔内血管成形术加支架植入术(PTAS)相比,PTBA通常会导致更高的术后残余狭窄:本研究纳入了采用经皮穿刺血管成形术(PTBA)或经皮穿刺血管成形术(PTAS)治疗的狭窄率为 70-99% 的无症状 ICAD 患者。所有患者均接受了术前和术后CT灌注,并由RAPID自动软件进行处理。脑灌注变化率定义为灌注变化量与术前灌注量之比。30天随访期内的围手术期并发症均有记录。对各组患者的基线特征、手术前后的血管狭窄程度、围手术期并发症以及脑灌注变化率进行了比较。对患者术后一年内的中风复发情况进行随访,并通过生存分析研究手术类型与复发之间的关系:结果:2021 年 3 月至 12 月间,107 名患者入组:30人(28.0%)接受了PTBA治疗,77人(72.0%)接受了经皮腔内血管成形术加支架植入术(PTAS)治疗。与 PTAS 组相比,PTBA 组的术后残余狭窄程度更高(PConclusions:两组患者的即时脑灌注变化和中风复发率无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信