Renal injury in NSAIDs: a real-world analysis based on the FAERS database.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Haojie Xu, Jiaming Cao, Hongyi Zhang, Fenglong Fei, Dongming Tang, Donghua Liu, Dongbin Luo
{"title":"Renal injury in NSAIDs: a real-world analysis based on the FAERS database.","authors":"Haojie Xu, Jiaming Cao, Hongyi Zhang, Fenglong Fei, Dongming Tang, Donghua Liu, Dongbin Luo","doi":"10.1007/s11255-024-04263-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the reporting risk of renal injury associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), with a particular focus on the reporting risk levels and onset times of different NSAIDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pharmacovigilance study was conducted using data from the FAERS database from January 2004 to December 2023. Reports of renal injury were identified, and signal detection was performed using reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) methods. The study compared the incidence, mortality rates, and onset times of renal injury across five NSAIDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 7436 cases of NSAID-associated renal injury analyzed, elderly patients are at an increased risk of renal injury associated with NSAID usage. Ibuprofen had the highest number of reports (3475 cases, 46.7%), while celecoxib had the lowest (542 cases, 7.3%). Ibuprofen showed the highest signal with renal injury (ROR 3.3, IC025 1.7), whereas celecoxib exhibited the lowest (ROR 1.4, IC025 0.4). Aspirin had the highest mortality rate associated with renal injury (18.7%), while ibuprofen had the lowest (3.8%). The median onset time for renal injury was 6 days, with 79.3% of adverse events occurring within the first 30 days of use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study indicates that ibuprofen presents the highest signal of renal injury, while celecoxib shows the lowest signal. The likelihood of NSAID-associated renal injury is heightened in elderly patients, and all five studied NSAIDs are linked to an increased likelihood of acute renal injury. NSAID-related renal damage tends to occur early in the treatment process, potentially leading to serious consequences. Due to the inherent limitations of pharmacovigilance studies, certain findings require additional validation like cohort studies. Nonetheless, the potential for an increased risk of renal injury must be taken into account in patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04263-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the reporting risk of renal injury associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), with a particular focus on the reporting risk levels and onset times of different NSAIDs.

Methods: A pharmacovigilance study was conducted using data from the FAERS database from January 2004 to December 2023. Reports of renal injury were identified, and signal detection was performed using reporting odds ratio (ROR) and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) methods. The study compared the incidence, mortality rates, and onset times of renal injury across five NSAIDs.

Results: Among the 7436 cases of NSAID-associated renal injury analyzed, elderly patients are at an increased risk of renal injury associated with NSAID usage. Ibuprofen had the highest number of reports (3475 cases, 46.7%), while celecoxib had the lowest (542 cases, 7.3%). Ibuprofen showed the highest signal with renal injury (ROR 3.3, IC025 1.7), whereas celecoxib exhibited the lowest (ROR 1.4, IC025 0.4). Aspirin had the highest mortality rate associated with renal injury (18.7%), while ibuprofen had the lowest (3.8%). The median onset time for renal injury was 6 days, with 79.3% of adverse events occurring within the first 30 days of use.

Conclusion: The study indicates that ibuprofen presents the highest signal of renal injury, while celecoxib shows the lowest signal. The likelihood of NSAID-associated renal injury is heightened in elderly patients, and all five studied NSAIDs are linked to an increased likelihood of acute renal injury. NSAID-related renal damage tends to occur early in the treatment process, potentially leading to serious consequences. Due to the inherent limitations of pharmacovigilance studies, certain findings require additional validation like cohort studies. Nonetheless, the potential for an increased risk of renal injury must be taken into account in patient care.

非甾体抗炎药的肾损伤:基于 FAERS 数据库的真实世界分析。
研究目的本研究旨在评估非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)相关肾损伤的报告风险,尤其关注不同非甾体抗炎药的报告风险水平和发病时间:方法:利用 FAERS 数据库中 2004 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月的数据开展了一项药物警戒研究。采用报告几率比(ROR)和贝叶斯置信度传播神经网络(BCPN)方法对肾损伤报告进行识别和信号检测。研究比较了五种非甾体抗炎药肾损伤的发病率、死亡率和发病时间:结果:在分析的 7436 例非甾体抗炎药相关肾损伤病例中,老年患者因使用非甾体抗炎药而导致肾损伤的风险增加。布洛芬的报告数量最多(3475例,46.7%),而塞来昔布的报告数量最少(542例,7.3%)。布洛芬显示出最高的肾损伤信号(ROR 3.3,IC025 1.7),而塞来昔布显示出最低的肾损伤信号(ROR 1.4,IC025 0.4)。阿司匹林与肾损伤相关的死亡率最高(18.7%),而布洛芬最低(3.8%)。肾损伤的中位发病时间为 6 天,79.3% 的不良事件发生在用药后的头 30 天内:研究表明,布洛芬的肾损伤信号最高,而塞来昔布的信号最低。老年患者发生与非甾体抗炎药相关的肾损伤的可能性更大,所研究的五种非甾体抗炎药都与急性肾损伤的可能性增加有关。非甾体抗炎药相关肾损伤往往发生在治疗过程的早期,有可能导致严重后果。由于药物警戒研究存在固有的局限性,某些研究结果需要像队列研究那样进行额外的验证。尽管如此,在护理病人时必须考虑到肾损伤风险增加的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信